高寒环境下传统森林管理模式与碳导向森林管理模式的比较

IF 0.8 Q3 ECONOMICS
Aestimum Pub Date : 2019-10-29 DOI:10.13128/AESTIM-7380
Simone Blanc, Cristian Accastello, A. Mosso, Ettore Bianchi, Federico Lingua, F. Brun
{"title":"高寒环境下传统森林管理模式与碳导向森林管理模式的比较","authors":"Simone Blanc, Cristian Accastello, A. Mosso, Ettore Bianchi, Federico Lingua, F. Brun","doi":"10.13128/AESTIM-7380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the traditional vs carbon-oriented forest management of two coniferous stands in the Alpine environment, quantifying the carbon sink, the carbon credit generated and the economic results. The results show the economic feasibility of the transition from current forest management strategies to a carbon-oriented method in the considered context. Carbon-oriented management provides relevant environmental benefits, combatting climate change, even though some elements of uncertainty still persist, particularly in relation to achieving a profitable management, specifically due to the volatile voluntary carbon credit market.","PeriodicalId":53999,"journal":{"name":"Aestimum","volume":"74 1","pages":"63-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.13128/AESTIM-7380","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confronto fra modelli di gestione forestale tradizionale e carbon oriented in ambito alpino\",\"authors\":\"Simone Blanc, Cristian Accastello, A. Mosso, Ettore Bianchi, Federico Lingua, F. Brun\",\"doi\":\"10.13128/AESTIM-7380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares the traditional vs carbon-oriented forest management of two coniferous stands in the Alpine environment, quantifying the carbon sink, the carbon credit generated and the economic results. The results show the economic feasibility of the transition from current forest management strategies to a carbon-oriented method in the considered context. Carbon-oriented management provides relevant environmental benefits, combatting climate change, even though some elements of uncertainty still persist, particularly in relation to achieving a profitable management, specifically due to the volatile voluntary carbon credit market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aestimum\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"63-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.13128/AESTIM-7380\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aestimum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13128/AESTIM-7380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aestimum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13128/AESTIM-7380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文比较了阿尔卑斯山环境中两个针叶树林的传统森林管理与碳导向森林管理,量化了碳汇、产生的碳信用和经济效益。结果表明,在经过深思熟虑的背景下,从目前的森林管理战略过渡到以碳为导向的方法在经济上是可行的。面向碳的管理提供了相关的环境效益,对抗气候变化,尽管一些不确定性因素仍然存在,特别是在实现盈利管理方面,特别是由于自愿碳信贷市场的波动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Confronto fra modelli di gestione forestale tradizionale e carbon oriented in ambito alpino
This paper compares the traditional vs carbon-oriented forest management of two coniferous stands in the Alpine environment, quantifying the carbon sink, the carbon credit generated and the economic results. The results show the economic feasibility of the transition from current forest management strategies to a carbon-oriented method in the considered context. Carbon-oriented management provides relevant environmental benefits, combatting climate change, even though some elements of uncertainty still persist, particularly in relation to achieving a profitable management, specifically due to the volatile voluntary carbon credit market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aestimum
Aestimum ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aestimum is a peer-reviewed Journal dedicated to the methodological study of appraisal and land economics. Established in 1976 by the Italian Association of Appraisers and Land Economists, which was legally recognized by Ministerial Decree, March 1993. Topics of interests comprise rural, urban and environmental appraisal, evaluation of public investments and land use planning. All the areas under discussion are addressed to the International scene. The interdisciplinary approach is one of the mainstays of this editorial project and all of the above mentioned topics are developed taking into consideration the economic, legal and urban planning aspects. Aestimum is biannual Journal and publishes articles both in Italian and English. Articles submitted are subjected to a double blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信