文章:名字里有什么?:南非及其他地区加密资产的“兴趣”分类

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW
Intertax Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.54648/taxi2022054
Shaun Parsons
{"title":"文章:名字里有什么?:南非及其他地区加密资产的“兴趣”分类","authors":"Shaun Parsons","doi":"10.54648/taxi2022054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decentralized finance (DeFi) represents a specific application of crypto-asset technology that has made significant advancements in adoption. While academic tax literature has focused on basic crypto-asset transactions, the tax consequences of DeFi transactions have been much less frequently explored. This study considers whether income or expenditure arising in specific DeFi transactions might be classified as interest in terms of South African income tax legislation as well as within the international tax context. Classification as interest has significant implications. Within South African domestic legislation, it impacts the determination of source, quantification of amounts, timing of recognition, application of exemptions, and imposition of withholding tax. Internationally, it has implications for the determination of jurisdictional taxing rights under double tax agreements. This study proposes that, while historically, interest may have been thought of exclusively as arising in the context of monetary debt, this is not a definitive characteristic of interest. Rather, interest represents remuneration for the provision of capital in the form of a loan principal with a contractual right to repayment. Whether each of these elements is present in the cases of the identified DeFi transactions is inconclusive. The study therefore recommends the provision of guidance to taxpayers by South Africa and other jurisdictions, and supports a coordinated approach among jurisdictions in the determination of income tax outcomes.","PeriodicalId":45365,"journal":{"name":"Intertax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Article: What’s in a Name?: The Classification of ‘Interest’ on Crypto-assets in South Africa and Beyond\",\"authors\":\"Shaun Parsons\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/taxi2022054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Decentralized finance (DeFi) represents a specific application of crypto-asset technology that has made significant advancements in adoption. While academic tax literature has focused on basic crypto-asset transactions, the tax consequences of DeFi transactions have been much less frequently explored. This study considers whether income or expenditure arising in specific DeFi transactions might be classified as interest in terms of South African income tax legislation as well as within the international tax context. Classification as interest has significant implications. Within South African domestic legislation, it impacts the determination of source, quantification of amounts, timing of recognition, application of exemptions, and imposition of withholding tax. Internationally, it has implications for the determination of jurisdictional taxing rights under double tax agreements. This study proposes that, while historically, interest may have been thought of exclusively as arising in the context of monetary debt, this is not a definitive characteristic of interest. Rather, interest represents remuneration for the provision of capital in the form of a loan principal with a contractual right to repayment. Whether each of these elements is present in the cases of the identified DeFi transactions is inconclusive. The study therefore recommends the provision of guidance to taxpayers by South Africa and other jurisdictions, and supports a coordinated approach among jurisdictions in the determination of income tax outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intertax\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intertax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2022054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intertax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2022054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

去中心化金融(DeFi)代表了加密资产技术的一个特定应用,在采用方面取得了重大进展。虽然学术税务文献关注的是基本的加密资产交易,但DeFi交易的税务后果却很少被探讨。本研究考虑了在南非所得税立法以及国际税收背景下,特定DeFi交易中产生的收入或支出是否可以归类为利息。将其归类为兴趣具有重要意义。在南非国内立法中,它影响来源的确定、金额的量化、承认的时间、豁免的适用和预扣税的征收。在国际上,它对确定双重税收协议下的管辖征税权具有影响。这项研究提出,虽然从历史上看,利息可能只被认为是在货币债务的背景下产生的,但这并不是利息的决定性特征。相反,利息代表以具有合同还款权的贷款本金形式提供资本的报酬。这些元素中的每一个是否存在于所识别的DeFi交易的情况中是不确定的。因此,该研究建议南非和其他司法管辖区为纳税人提供指导,并支持司法管辖区在确定所得税结果时采取协调一致的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Article: What’s in a Name?: The Classification of ‘Interest’ on Crypto-assets in South Africa and Beyond
Decentralized finance (DeFi) represents a specific application of crypto-asset technology that has made significant advancements in adoption. While academic tax literature has focused on basic crypto-asset transactions, the tax consequences of DeFi transactions have been much less frequently explored. This study considers whether income or expenditure arising in specific DeFi transactions might be classified as interest in terms of South African income tax legislation as well as within the international tax context. Classification as interest has significant implications. Within South African domestic legislation, it impacts the determination of source, quantification of amounts, timing of recognition, application of exemptions, and imposition of withholding tax. Internationally, it has implications for the determination of jurisdictional taxing rights under double tax agreements. This study proposes that, while historically, interest may have been thought of exclusively as arising in the context of monetary debt, this is not a definitive characteristic of interest. Rather, interest represents remuneration for the provision of capital in the form of a loan principal with a contractual right to repayment. Whether each of these elements is present in the cases of the identified DeFi transactions is inconclusive. The study therefore recommends the provision of guidance to taxpayers by South Africa and other jurisdictions, and supports a coordinated approach among jurisdictions in the determination of income tax outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intertax
Intertax LAW-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信