他们是好人,但不是邻居…:1990-2017年期间荷兰对移民、穆斯林和“吉普赛人”的社交距离变化

Q4 Social Sciences
M. Lubbers, P. Scheepers
{"title":"他们是好人,但不是邻居…:1990-2017年期间荷兰对移民、穆斯林和“吉普赛人”的社交距离变化","authors":"M. Lubbers, P. Scheepers","doi":"10.5117/mem2019.4.005.lubb","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this study, we focus on a considered key value of the Netherlands: tolerance towards outgroups. We set out to answer the research questions: (1) what has been the longitudinal trend in social distance towards migrants, Muslims and ‘Gypsies’?; and (2)\n have there been (changes in) longitudinal differences between specific social categories?, in relation to the theoretical assumptions from contact and conflict theory. Based on Dutch data from the European Values Study, we show that social distance towards migrants, Muslims and ‘Gypsies’\n increased in the first decade of the century as compared to the previous decade. In the second decade, social distance towards migrants and Muslims has not changed much; however, social distance towards ‘Gypsies’ has strongly increased further, even though the size of the group\n hardly changed. We discuss differential longitudinal trends within specific societal groups. The youngest cohort, socialized most strongly with immigrants and Muslims, turns out to be most likely to keep distance towards these groups in recent times ‐ a finding more in line with conflict\n theory than with contact theory. We end with explanations for the observation that particularly the ‘Gypsies’ have become the most excluded outgroup, not just in the Netherlands, but in the whole of Europe.","PeriodicalId":35265,"journal":{"name":"Mens en Maatschappij","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Het zijn aardige mensen, maar liever niet als buren... : Veranderingen in sociale distantie tegenover migranten, moslims en ‘zigeuners’ in Nederland in de periode 1990-2017\",\"authors\":\"M. Lubbers, P. Scheepers\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/mem2019.4.005.lubb\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this study, we focus on a considered key value of the Netherlands: tolerance towards outgroups. We set out to answer the research questions: (1) what has been the longitudinal trend in social distance towards migrants, Muslims and ‘Gypsies’?; and (2)\\n have there been (changes in) longitudinal differences between specific social categories?, in relation to the theoretical assumptions from contact and conflict theory. Based on Dutch data from the European Values Study, we show that social distance towards migrants, Muslims and ‘Gypsies’\\n increased in the first decade of the century as compared to the previous decade. In the second decade, social distance towards migrants and Muslims has not changed much; however, social distance towards ‘Gypsies’ has strongly increased further, even though the size of the group\\n hardly changed. We discuss differential longitudinal trends within specific societal groups. The youngest cohort, socialized most strongly with immigrants and Muslims, turns out to be most likely to keep distance towards these groups in recent times ‐ a finding more in line with conflict\\n theory than with contact theory. We end with explanations for the observation that particularly the ‘Gypsies’ have become the most excluded outgroup, not just in the Netherlands, but in the whole of Europe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mens en Maatschappij\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mens en Maatschappij\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/mem2019.4.005.lubb\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mens en Maatschappij","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/mem2019.4.005.lubb","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要在这项研究中,我们关注荷兰的一个重要价值观:对外群体的宽容。我们着手回答研究问题:(1)移民、穆斯林和“吉普赛人”的社交距离纵向趋势是什么?;以及(2)特定社会类别之间是否存在(变化)纵向差异?,关于接触和冲突理论的理论假设。根据荷兰《欧洲价值观研究》的数据,我们发现,与前十年相比,本世纪前十年,与移民、穆斯林和“吉普赛人”的社交距离有所增加。在第二个十年里,对移民和穆斯林的社交距离没有太大变化;然而,尽管吉普赛人的规模几乎没有变化,但他们与吉普赛人的社交距离却大幅增加。我们讨论了特定社会群体中不同的纵向趋势。与移民和穆斯林交往最密切的最年轻群体,最近最有可能与这些群体保持距离——这一发现更符合冲突理论,而不是接触理论。我们最后解释了这样一种观察,即特别是“吉普赛人”已经成为最受排斥的外来群体,不仅在荷兰,而且在整个欧洲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Het zijn aardige mensen, maar liever niet als buren... : Veranderingen in sociale distantie tegenover migranten, moslims en ‘zigeuners’ in Nederland in de periode 1990-2017
Abstract In this study, we focus on a considered key value of the Netherlands: tolerance towards outgroups. We set out to answer the research questions: (1) what has been the longitudinal trend in social distance towards migrants, Muslims and ‘Gypsies’?; and (2) have there been (changes in) longitudinal differences between specific social categories?, in relation to the theoretical assumptions from contact and conflict theory. Based on Dutch data from the European Values Study, we show that social distance towards migrants, Muslims and ‘Gypsies’ increased in the first decade of the century as compared to the previous decade. In the second decade, social distance towards migrants and Muslims has not changed much; however, social distance towards ‘Gypsies’ has strongly increased further, even though the size of the group hardly changed. We discuss differential longitudinal trends within specific societal groups. The youngest cohort, socialized most strongly with immigrants and Muslims, turns out to be most likely to keep distance towards these groups in recent times ‐ a finding more in line with conflict theory than with contact theory. We end with explanations for the observation that particularly the ‘Gypsies’ have become the most excluded outgroup, not just in the Netherlands, but in the whole of Europe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mens en Maatschappij
Mens en Maatschappij Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Mens en Maatschappij is een Nederlandstalig tijdschrift voor sociale wetenschappen. Het biedt het beste en breedste begrip van de actuele ontwikkelingen binnen de sociale wetenschappen en sociologie. De redactie selecteert artikelen op wetenschappelijke kwaliteit en actualiteit. Alle artikelen worden onderworpen aan een peer-reviewproces. Het tijdschrift is geen spreekbuis van een bepaalde richting of stroming, maar staat open voor elke bijdrage op wetenschappelijk niveau. Naast de reguliere nummers verschijnt ieder jaar een themanummer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信