重新审视岩屑研究中的“石英问题”:一个回顾和新的、开放获取的实验数据集

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
C. Spry, R. Kurpiel, E. Foley, Paul Penzo‐Kajewski
{"title":"重新审视岩屑研究中的“石英问题”:一个回顾和新的、开放获取的实验数据集","authors":"C. Spry, R. Kurpiel, E. Foley, Paul Penzo‐Kajewski","doi":"10.1080/01977261.2021.1981655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Quartz artefacts are common components of flaked stone assemblages worldwide. However, flaked quartz can appear similar to quartz fractured by natural and other (non-flaking) cultural processes. Despite attempts to address this “quartz problem”, the analysis and interpretation of flaked quartz assemblages remain problematic. Here we present a review of literature investigating the quartz problem, and a case study that examines an experimentally flaked assemblage – including the presence of “markers” widely reported to be diagnostic of knapped quartz. The results suggest that freehand knapping of a vein quartz block will produce mostly shatter and small, undiagnostic pieces with few artifacts exhibiting previously suggested markers. An integrated approach, considering physical features of individual quartz pieces, along with assemblage composition, characteristics and context more broadly, is therefore crucial. The dataset created for this study is freely available, providing the first example of an open-access dataset to aid study of flaked quartz assemblages worldwide.","PeriodicalId":45597,"journal":{"name":"Lithic Technology","volume":"47 1","pages":"171 - 181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the “Quartz Problem” in Lithic Studies: A Review and New, Open-access, Experimental Dataset\",\"authors\":\"C. Spry, R. Kurpiel, E. Foley, Paul Penzo‐Kajewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01977261.2021.1981655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Quartz artefacts are common components of flaked stone assemblages worldwide. However, flaked quartz can appear similar to quartz fractured by natural and other (non-flaking) cultural processes. Despite attempts to address this “quartz problem”, the analysis and interpretation of flaked quartz assemblages remain problematic. Here we present a review of literature investigating the quartz problem, and a case study that examines an experimentally flaked assemblage – including the presence of “markers” widely reported to be diagnostic of knapped quartz. The results suggest that freehand knapping of a vein quartz block will produce mostly shatter and small, undiagnostic pieces with few artifacts exhibiting previously suggested markers. An integrated approach, considering physical features of individual quartz pieces, along with assemblage composition, characteristics and context more broadly, is therefore crucial. The dataset created for this study is freely available, providing the first example of an open-access dataset to aid study of flaked quartz assemblages worldwide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lithic Technology\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"171 - 181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lithic Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.2021.1981655\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lithic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.2021.1981655","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要石英制品是世界各地片状石头组合的常见组成部分。然而,片状石英可能与通过自然和其他(非片状)培养过程破碎的石英相似。尽管试图解决这一“石英问题”,但对片状石英组合的分析和解释仍然存在问题。在这里,我们对研究石英问题的文献进行了回顾,并对一个实验性薄片组合进行了案例研究,包括广泛报道的诊断破碎石英的“标记物”的存在。结果表明,静脉石英块的徒手敲击将产生大部分破碎和小的、不可知的碎片,很少有文物显示出之前建议的标记。因此,综合考虑单个石英片的物理特征,以及更广泛的组合组成、特征和背景,是至关重要的。为这项研究创建的数据集是免费提供的,提供了第一个开放访问数据集的例子,以帮助研究世界各地的片状石英组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting the “Quartz Problem” in Lithic Studies: A Review and New, Open-access, Experimental Dataset
ABSTRACT Quartz artefacts are common components of flaked stone assemblages worldwide. However, flaked quartz can appear similar to quartz fractured by natural and other (non-flaking) cultural processes. Despite attempts to address this “quartz problem”, the analysis and interpretation of flaked quartz assemblages remain problematic. Here we present a review of literature investigating the quartz problem, and a case study that examines an experimentally flaked assemblage – including the presence of “markers” widely reported to be diagnostic of knapped quartz. The results suggest that freehand knapping of a vein quartz block will produce mostly shatter and small, undiagnostic pieces with few artifacts exhibiting previously suggested markers. An integrated approach, considering physical features of individual quartz pieces, along with assemblage composition, characteristics and context more broadly, is therefore crucial. The dataset created for this study is freely available, providing the first example of an open-access dataset to aid study of flaked quartz assemblages worldwide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lithic Technology
Lithic Technology Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信