支持多样化的学习风格:以学生主导的教学大纲设计为例

IF 0.9 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
L. Harding
{"title":"支持多样化的学习风格:以学生主导的教学大纲设计为例","authors":"L. Harding","doi":"10.1080/15512169.2022.2117626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper presents a case study in student led syllabus design, geared to support diverse learning styles and to enhance student engagement. In this case, students in an Honors American Government Course participated in designing their own syllabus for the semester. This was done through a written survey in which students were able to select their preferred learning method, combination of assignments and activities, accountability mechanisms, testing structure and level of active learning. The tabulation of student responses resulted in a student designed syllabus that reflected a diversity of learning styles and a combination of passive and active learning mechanisms including traditional lecture, readings and research-based writing assignments, as well as debate, simulation and small group discussion, tailored to the preferences of the class. Student evaluations showed a high level of satisfaction with the student led syllabus design as well as with the course overall. Student participation in syllabus design allowed for differences in learning styles to be reflected in the structure of teaching mechanisms, assignments and activities, resulting in enhanced student “buy in.” This sense of ownership contributed to satisfaction, even with aspects of the course that students did not personally select, and increased levels of motivation and participation in assignments and activities. This paper will analyze the process, the outcomes, and the pros and cons of student led syllabus design as applied in this case, and evaluate its impact on learning style diversity and student engagement.","PeriodicalId":46033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Science Education","volume":"19 1","pages":"83 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting Diverse Learning Styles: A Case Study in Student Led Syllabus Design\",\"authors\":\"L. Harding\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15512169.2022.2117626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper presents a case study in student led syllabus design, geared to support diverse learning styles and to enhance student engagement. In this case, students in an Honors American Government Course participated in designing their own syllabus for the semester. This was done through a written survey in which students were able to select their preferred learning method, combination of assignments and activities, accountability mechanisms, testing structure and level of active learning. The tabulation of student responses resulted in a student designed syllabus that reflected a diversity of learning styles and a combination of passive and active learning mechanisms including traditional lecture, readings and research-based writing assignments, as well as debate, simulation and small group discussion, tailored to the preferences of the class. Student evaluations showed a high level of satisfaction with the student led syllabus design as well as with the course overall. Student participation in syllabus design allowed for differences in learning styles to be reflected in the structure of teaching mechanisms, assignments and activities, resulting in enhanced student “buy in.” This sense of ownership contributed to satisfaction, even with aspects of the course that students did not personally select, and increased levels of motivation and participation in assignments and activities. This paper will analyze the process, the outcomes, and the pros and cons of student led syllabus design as applied in this case, and evaluate its impact on learning style diversity and student engagement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Political Science Education\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"83 - 90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Political Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2022.2117626\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2022.2117626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文提出了一个以学生为主导的教学大纲设计的案例研究,旨在支持不同的学习方式,提高学生的参与度。在这种情况下,参加美国政府荣誉课程的学生参与设计了他们自己的学期教学大纲。这是通过书面调查来完成的,学生可以选择他们喜欢的学习方法,作业和活动的组合,问责机制,测试结构和主动学习的水平。对学生的反馈进行制表后,学生设计的教学大纲反映了学习风格的多样性,并结合了被动和主动的学习机制,包括传统的讲座、阅读和基于研究的写作作业,以及辩论、模拟和小组讨论,这些都是根据学生的喜好量身定制的。学生的评价显示,学生主导的教学大纲设计和课程的整体满意度很高。学生参与教学大纲的设计,可以使不同的学习风格反映在教学机制、作业和活动的结构中,从而增强学生的“参与”。这种主人翁意识有助于提高满意度,即使是学生没有亲自选择的课程方面,也会提高学生对作业和活动的积极性和参与度。本文将分析学生主导教学大纲设计的过程、结果和利弊,并评估其对学习风格多样性和学生参与度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supporting Diverse Learning Styles: A Case Study in Student Led Syllabus Design
Abstract This paper presents a case study in student led syllabus design, geared to support diverse learning styles and to enhance student engagement. In this case, students in an Honors American Government Course participated in designing their own syllabus for the semester. This was done through a written survey in which students were able to select their preferred learning method, combination of assignments and activities, accountability mechanisms, testing structure and level of active learning. The tabulation of student responses resulted in a student designed syllabus that reflected a diversity of learning styles and a combination of passive and active learning mechanisms including traditional lecture, readings and research-based writing assignments, as well as debate, simulation and small group discussion, tailored to the preferences of the class. Student evaluations showed a high level of satisfaction with the student led syllabus design as well as with the course overall. Student participation in syllabus design allowed for differences in learning styles to be reflected in the structure of teaching mechanisms, assignments and activities, resulting in enhanced student “buy in.” This sense of ownership contributed to satisfaction, even with aspects of the course that students did not personally select, and increased levels of motivation and participation in assignments and activities. This paper will analyze the process, the outcomes, and the pros and cons of student led syllabus design as applied in this case, and evaluate its impact on learning style diversity and student engagement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
36.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Political Science Education is an intellectually rigorous, path-breaking, agenda-setting journal that publishes the highest quality scholarship on teaching and pedagogical issues in political science. The journal aims to represent the full range of questions, issues and approaches regarding political science education, including teaching-related issues, methods and techniques, learning/teaching activities and devices, educational assessment in political science, graduate education, and curriculum development. In particular, the journal''s Editors welcome studies that reflect the scholarship of teaching and learning, or works that would be informative and/or of practical use to the readers of the Journal of Political Science Education , and address topics in an empirical way, making use of the techniques that political scientists use in their own substantive research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信