根据纽曼理论中所观察的性别来分析学生在散文问题上的错误推理

E. Lestari, Shofan Fiangga
{"title":"根据纽曼理论中所观察的性别来分析学生在散文问题上的错误推理","authors":"E. Lestari, Shofan Fiangga","doi":"10.21274/jtm.2021.4.2.187-200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study research to determine the differences in the types of errors and the cause students' errors in solving fraction story problems by male and female students in terms of Newman's theory. This research is using a qualitative approach to the type of case study. The subjects of this study were 3 male and 3 female students in grade VII MTsN 2 Trenggalek. The selection of research subjects was carried out based on the same mathematical ability and the suitability of gender criteria. The data collection techniques are written tests, unstructured interviews, and documentation. Data analysis techniques are data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. Based on the results of the study, (1) it was not found that male students and female students made reading errors, (2) male students and female students made comprehension errors with the same percentage, the cause was not writing down what was known and asked, (3) only male students made a transformation errors, the cause was choosing the wrong operation, formula, not converting the problem into mathematical form, (4) male students making process skill errors with a higher percentage than female, the cause was student perform the wrong operations, processes, and calculation results, while female students make mistakes in the process and calculation results, (5) male students make encoding error with higher percentage, the cause was students incorrectly or not writing the final answer.","PeriodicalId":52842,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Tadris Matematika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Pecahan Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin Ditinjau dari Teori Newman\",\"authors\":\"E. Lestari, Shofan Fiangga\",\"doi\":\"10.21274/jtm.2021.4.2.187-200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study research to determine the differences in the types of errors and the cause students' errors in solving fraction story problems by male and female students in terms of Newman's theory. This research is using a qualitative approach to the type of case study. The subjects of this study were 3 male and 3 female students in grade VII MTsN 2 Trenggalek. The selection of research subjects was carried out based on the same mathematical ability and the suitability of gender criteria. The data collection techniques are written tests, unstructured interviews, and documentation. Data analysis techniques are data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. Based on the results of the study, (1) it was not found that male students and female students made reading errors, (2) male students and female students made comprehension errors with the same percentage, the cause was not writing down what was known and asked, (3) only male students made a transformation errors, the cause was choosing the wrong operation, formula, not converting the problem into mathematical form, (4) male students making process skill errors with a higher percentage than female, the cause was student perform the wrong operations, processes, and calculation results, while female students make mistakes in the process and calculation results, (5) male students make encoding error with higher percentage, the cause was students incorrectly or not writing the final answer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Tadris Matematika\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Tadris Matematika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21274/jtm.2021.4.2.187-200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Tadris Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21274/jtm.2021.4.2.187-200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究以纽曼理论为基础,研究男女学生在解决分数故事问题时错误类型的差异及产生错误的原因。本研究采用的是定性方法的案例研究类型。本研究以丁加勒中学七年级3男3女为研究对象。研究对象的选择是根据相同的数学能力和性别标准的适用性进行的。数据收集技术包括书面测试、非结构化访谈和文档。数据分析技术包括数据简化、数据表示和结论绘制。从研究结果来看,(1)没有发现男学生和女学生出现阅读错误;(2)男学生和女学生出现理解错误的比例相同,原因是没有把已知和问的东西写下来;(3)只有男学生出现转换错误,原因是选择了错误的运算、公式,没有将问题转换成数学形式;(4)男生犯过程技能错误的比例高于女生,原因是学生执行错误的操作、过程和计算结果,而女生犯过程和计算结果错误;(5)男生犯编码错误的比例更高,原因是学生错误或没有写出最终答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Pecahan Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin Ditinjau dari Teori Newman
This study research to determine the differences in the types of errors and the cause students' errors in solving fraction story problems by male and female students in terms of Newman's theory. This research is using a qualitative approach to the type of case study. The subjects of this study were 3 male and 3 female students in grade VII MTsN 2 Trenggalek. The selection of research subjects was carried out based on the same mathematical ability and the suitability of gender criteria. The data collection techniques are written tests, unstructured interviews, and documentation. Data analysis techniques are data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. Based on the results of the study, (1) it was not found that male students and female students made reading errors, (2) male students and female students made comprehension errors with the same percentage, the cause was not writing down what was known and asked, (3) only male students made a transformation errors, the cause was choosing the wrong operation, formula, not converting the problem into mathematical form, (4) male students making process skill errors with a higher percentage than female, the cause was student perform the wrong operations, processes, and calculation results, while female students make mistakes in the process and calculation results, (5) male students make encoding error with higher percentage, the cause was students incorrectly or not writing the final answer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信