适合使用吗?评估性暴力和基于性别的暴力预防和应对数字技术干预的可及性、行动理论和问责制

IF 1.2 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
T. Cookson, Lorena Fuentes, J. Zulver, Austin Nelson
{"title":"适合使用吗?评估性暴力和基于性别的暴力预防和应对数字技术干预的可及性、行动理论和问责制","authors":"T. Cookson, Lorena Fuentes, J. Zulver, Austin Nelson","doi":"10.1080/09718524.2023.2182035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper presents the results of a scoping review of Information and Communications Technologies for Development (ICT4D) interventions designed to address sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV). Our analysis considers the extent to which these ICT4D interventions align with established strategies for preventing and responding to SGBV from gender equality and global health practitioner communities. Using a feminist lens, we propose three parameters against which design features of digitally-based SGBV interventions should be assessed: (1) accessibility, (2) theory of action, and (3) accountability. Reading the intervention landscape through these parameters, our results indicate that ICT interventions to address SGBV deploy creative use of various technologies, from mapping software to social networks and document storage. That said, we also find significant scope for improving the accessibility of existing interventions through use of features that remove literacy barriers. Our findings around the accountability of interventions highlight the need for far greater engagement with emerging conceptualizations of data rights. Finally, we show that existing theories of action are only partially aligned with “offline” best practices.","PeriodicalId":45357,"journal":{"name":"Gender Technology & Development","volume":"27 1","pages":"184 - 206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fit for purpose? Assessing the accessibility, theory of action, and accountability of digital technology interventions for sexual and gender-based violence prevention and response\",\"authors\":\"T. Cookson, Lorena Fuentes, J. Zulver, Austin Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09718524.2023.2182035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper presents the results of a scoping review of Information and Communications Technologies for Development (ICT4D) interventions designed to address sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV). Our analysis considers the extent to which these ICT4D interventions align with established strategies for preventing and responding to SGBV from gender equality and global health practitioner communities. Using a feminist lens, we propose three parameters against which design features of digitally-based SGBV interventions should be assessed: (1) accessibility, (2) theory of action, and (3) accountability. Reading the intervention landscape through these parameters, our results indicate that ICT interventions to address SGBV deploy creative use of various technologies, from mapping software to social networks and document storage. That said, we also find significant scope for improving the accessibility of existing interventions through use of features that remove literacy barriers. Our findings around the accountability of interventions highlight the need for far greater engagement with emerging conceptualizations of data rights. Finally, we show that existing theories of action are only partially aligned with “offline” best practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender Technology & Development\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"184 - 206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender Technology & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2023.2182035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Technology & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2023.2182035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文介绍了对旨在解决性暴力和基于性别的暴力的信息和通信技术促进发展干预措施的范围审查结果。我们的分析考虑了这些ICT4D干预措施在多大程度上符合性别平等和全球卫生从业者社区预防和应对性暴力和基于性别的暴力的既定战略。使用女权主义视角,我们提出了三个参数,应根据这些参数评估基于数字的性暴力和基于性别的暴力干预措施的设计特征:(1)可及性,(2)行动理论,和(3)问责制。通过这些参数解读干预情况,我们的结果表明,解决性暴力和基于性别的暴力的信息和通信技术干预措施创造性地使用了各种技术,从绘图软件到社交网络和文件存储。也就是说,我们还发现,通过使用消除识字障碍的功能,可以大大提高现有干预措施的可及性。我们关于干预措施问责制的研究结果强调,需要更多地参与新出现的数据权利概念。最后,我们表明,现有的行动理论只与“离线”最佳实践部分一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fit for purpose? Assessing the accessibility, theory of action, and accountability of digital technology interventions for sexual and gender-based violence prevention and response
Abstract This paper presents the results of a scoping review of Information and Communications Technologies for Development (ICT4D) interventions designed to address sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV). Our analysis considers the extent to which these ICT4D interventions align with established strategies for preventing and responding to SGBV from gender equality and global health practitioner communities. Using a feminist lens, we propose three parameters against which design features of digitally-based SGBV interventions should be assessed: (1) accessibility, (2) theory of action, and (3) accountability. Reading the intervention landscape through these parameters, our results indicate that ICT interventions to address SGBV deploy creative use of various technologies, from mapping software to social networks and document storage. That said, we also find significant scope for improving the accessibility of existing interventions through use of features that remove literacy barriers. Our findings around the accountability of interventions highlight the need for far greater engagement with emerging conceptualizations of data rights. Finally, we show that existing theories of action are only partially aligned with “offline” best practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gender Technology & Development
Gender Technology & Development SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Gender, Technology and Development is an international, multi-disciplinary, refereed journal serving as a forum for exploring the linkages among changing gender relations, technological change and developing societies. The journal"s main focus is on the shifting boundaries and meanings of gender, technology and development, addressing transnational phenomena and engaging in dialogues that cut across geographical boundaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信