群体认同与自我群体相似性:区分投射与内射

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
K. Locke
{"title":"群体认同与自我群体相似性:区分投射与内射","authors":"K. Locke","doi":"10.1080/15298868.2023.2244723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Two studies demonstrate a technique that can clarify to what degree individual differences in perceived self-ingroup similarity reflect differences in projecting the self onto the group (self-anchoring) and/or introjecting the group onto the self (self-stereotyping). In preregistered Study 1 undergraduates described their values and those of fellow students. In Study 2 (a reanalysis of Denning & Hodges, 2022) citizens described their personalities and those of compatriots with similar voting preferences. Across both studies, ingroup identification predicted perceived self-ingroup similarity. Decomposing each participant’s self-ratings and ingroup-stereotype-ratings into normative (average) and distinctive (non-normative) profiles suggested this was primarily attributable to projecting the self-concept onto the group, but in Study 2's intergroup conflict situation perhaps also attributable to ingroup enhancement and introjecting ingroup-stereotypes.","PeriodicalId":51426,"journal":{"name":"Self and Identity","volume":"22 1","pages":"1027 - 1051"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group identification and perceived self-group similarity: differentiating projection from introjection\",\"authors\":\"K. Locke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15298868.2023.2244723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Two studies demonstrate a technique that can clarify to what degree individual differences in perceived self-ingroup similarity reflect differences in projecting the self onto the group (self-anchoring) and/or introjecting the group onto the self (self-stereotyping). In preregistered Study 1 undergraduates described their values and those of fellow students. In Study 2 (a reanalysis of Denning & Hodges, 2022) citizens described their personalities and those of compatriots with similar voting preferences. Across both studies, ingroup identification predicted perceived self-ingroup similarity. Decomposing each participant’s self-ratings and ingroup-stereotype-ratings into normative (average) and distinctive (non-normative) profiles suggested this was primarily attributable to projecting the self-concept onto the group, but in Study 2's intergroup conflict situation perhaps also attributable to ingroup enhancement and introjecting ingroup-stereotypes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Self and Identity\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"1027 - 1051\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Self and Identity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2023.2244723\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Self and Identity","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2023.2244723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要两项研究证明了一种技术,该技术可以阐明感知自我-群体相似性的个体差异在多大程度上反映了将自我投射到群体上(自我锚定)和/或将群体引入自我(自我刻板印象)的差异。在预先注册的研究1中,本科生描述了他们和同学的价值观。在研究2中(Denning&Hodges的再分析,2022),公民描述了他们的性格和具有相似投票偏好的同胞的性格。在这两项研究中,组内识别预测了感知到的自我组内相似性。将每个参与者的自我评分和组内刻板印象评分分解为规范(平均)和独特(非规范)档案表明,这主要归因于将自我概念投射到群体上,但在研究2中,组间冲突情况可能也归因于组内强化和内射组内刻板形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Group identification and perceived self-group similarity: differentiating projection from introjection
ABSTRACT Two studies demonstrate a technique that can clarify to what degree individual differences in perceived self-ingroup similarity reflect differences in projecting the self onto the group (self-anchoring) and/or introjecting the group onto the self (self-stereotyping). In preregistered Study 1 undergraduates described their values and those of fellow students. In Study 2 (a reanalysis of Denning & Hodges, 2022) citizens described their personalities and those of compatriots with similar voting preferences. Across both studies, ingroup identification predicted perceived self-ingroup similarity. Decomposing each participant’s self-ratings and ingroup-stereotype-ratings into normative (average) and distinctive (non-normative) profiles suggested this was primarily attributable to projecting the self-concept onto the group, but in Study 2's intergroup conflict situation perhaps also attributable to ingroup enhancement and introjecting ingroup-stereotypes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Self and Identity
Self and Identity PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Work on self and identity has a special place in the study of human nature, as self-concerns are arguably at the center of individuals" striving for well-being and for making sense of one"s life. Life goals develop and are influenced by one"s view of what one is like, the way one would ideally like to be (or would like to avoid being), as well as one"s perceptions of what is feasible. Furthermore, conceptions of self and the world affect how one"s progress towards these goals is monitored, evaluated, redirected, re-evaluated, and pursued again. Thus, the “self” as a construct has far-reaching implications for behavior, self-esteem, motivation, experience of emotions and the world more broadly, and hence for interpersonal relationships, society, and culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信