《过去与现在:“酷儿”肖像能告诉我们的关于“新”朗格·杜尔杰的什么》

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Laura L. Doan
{"title":"《过去与现在:“酷儿”肖像能告诉我们的关于“新”朗格·杜尔杰的什么》","authors":"Laura L. Doan","doi":"10.1080/14714787.2017.1310630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When we fix our gaze on a sexual object in the context of queer remembrance the pull toward a linear narrative of homosexual emancipation is hard to resist. The use of queer portraiture in the Tate Britain’s exhibition (‘Queer British Art, 1861–1967’), marking the fiftieth anniversary of the Sexual Offences Act (1967), provides a good opportunity for reflecting on the limits and possibilities of expecting resemblance across time. Identifying the sitter as an X binds us to a past remembered which condenses all the messiness of sexual desire into the modern categories prevalent today, though this approach to pastness entails risk in increasing rather than decreasing the distance between then and now. Looking specifically at the portraits of two women prominent in London’s bohemian circles in the interwar era (Radclyffe Hall and Una, Lady Troubridge) I wonder what is at stake in imagining the object as like us.","PeriodicalId":35078,"journal":{"name":"Visual Culture in Britain","volume":"18 1","pages":"18 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14714787.2017.1310630","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Then and Now: What the ‘Queer’ Portrait Can Teach Us about the ‘New’ Longue Durée\",\"authors\":\"Laura L. Doan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14714787.2017.1310630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When we fix our gaze on a sexual object in the context of queer remembrance the pull toward a linear narrative of homosexual emancipation is hard to resist. The use of queer portraiture in the Tate Britain’s exhibition (‘Queer British Art, 1861–1967’), marking the fiftieth anniversary of the Sexual Offences Act (1967), provides a good opportunity for reflecting on the limits and possibilities of expecting resemblance across time. Identifying the sitter as an X binds us to a past remembered which condenses all the messiness of sexual desire into the modern categories prevalent today, though this approach to pastness entails risk in increasing rather than decreasing the distance between then and now. Looking specifically at the portraits of two women prominent in London’s bohemian circles in the interwar era (Radclyffe Hall and Una, Lady Troubridge) I wonder what is at stake in imagining the object as like us.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visual Culture in Britain\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"18 - 34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14714787.2017.1310630\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visual Culture in Britain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14714787.2017.1310630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Culture in Britain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14714787.2017.1310630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当我们在酷儿记忆的背景下将目光锁定在性对象上时,同性恋解放的线性叙事的吸引力是难以抗拒的。在泰特英国美术馆的展览(“英国酷儿艺术,1861-1967”)中使用酷儿肖像,以纪念《性犯罪法》(1967)颁布五十周年,这为反思期望跨越时间的相似性的局限性和可能性提供了一个很好的机会。将模特视为一个X,将我们与记忆中的过去捆绑在一起,将所有杂乱的性欲浓缩为当今流行的现代类别,尽管这种对过去的处理方式有增加而不是减少过去与现在之间距离的风险。仔细看了两次世界大战之间伦敦波西米亚圈子里两位杰出女性的肖像(拉德克利夫·霍尔和乌娜·特鲁布里奇夫人),我想知道把这些人物想象成我们这样有什么危险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Then and Now: What the ‘Queer’ Portrait Can Teach Us about the ‘New’ Longue Durée
When we fix our gaze on a sexual object in the context of queer remembrance the pull toward a linear narrative of homosexual emancipation is hard to resist. The use of queer portraiture in the Tate Britain’s exhibition (‘Queer British Art, 1861–1967’), marking the fiftieth anniversary of the Sexual Offences Act (1967), provides a good opportunity for reflecting on the limits and possibilities of expecting resemblance across time. Identifying the sitter as an X binds us to a past remembered which condenses all the messiness of sexual desire into the modern categories prevalent today, though this approach to pastness entails risk in increasing rather than decreasing the distance between then and now. Looking specifically at the portraits of two women prominent in London’s bohemian circles in the interwar era (Radclyffe Hall and Una, Lady Troubridge) I wonder what is at stake in imagining the object as like us.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Visual Culture in Britain
Visual Culture in Britain Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信