企业应对气候变化风险:来自澳大利亚的证据

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Samindi Ishara Hewa, Jinhua Chen, Rajni Mala
{"title":"企业应对气候变化风险:来自澳大利亚的证据","authors":"Samindi Ishara Hewa, Jinhua Chen, Rajni Mala","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2023.2220297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study aims to (1) explore the extent to which Australian companies respond to regulatory, physical and market risks associated with climate change, and (2) examine the impact of stakeholder pressure and corporate governance structure on the extent of corporate response to these risks. We collected survey data from 120 top risk managers of Australian companies. Our analysis shows that companies respond to regulatory risks to a greater extent than to physical and market risks. With respect to the impact of stakeholder pressure, the results show that overall, pressure from government, non-governmental organisations, competitors, and the media are positively and significantly associated with companies’ climate change risk responses. Disaggregated analyses show differences in how particular stakeholder groups’ pressure affects the corporate response to physical risks. With respect to corporate governance structure, the results demonstrate that female representation on the board of directors and existence of a climate change risk committee facilitate companies’ increased climate change risk response.","PeriodicalId":46081,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"30 1","pages":"188 - 214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate responses to climate change risks: evidence from Australia\",\"authors\":\"Samindi Ishara Hewa, Jinhua Chen, Rajni Mala\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14486563.2023.2220297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study aims to (1) explore the extent to which Australian companies respond to regulatory, physical and market risks associated with climate change, and (2) examine the impact of stakeholder pressure and corporate governance structure on the extent of corporate response to these risks. We collected survey data from 120 top risk managers of Australian companies. Our analysis shows that companies respond to regulatory risks to a greater extent than to physical and market risks. With respect to the impact of stakeholder pressure, the results show that overall, pressure from government, non-governmental organisations, competitors, and the media are positively and significantly associated with companies’ climate change risk responses. Disaggregated analyses show differences in how particular stakeholder groups’ pressure affects the corporate response to physical risks. With respect to corporate governance structure, the results demonstrate that female representation on the board of directors and existence of a climate change risk committee facilitate companies’ increased climate change risk response.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"188 - 214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2023.2220297\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2023.2220297","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在(1)探讨澳大利亚公司对与气候变化相关的监管、实物和市场风险的反应程度,以及(2)研究利益相关者压力和公司治理结构对公司对这些风险反应程度的影响。我们收集了来自澳大利亚公司120位顶级风险经理的调查数据。我们的分析表明,公司对监管风险的反应比对实物和市场风险的反应更大。关于利益相关者压力的影响,研究结果表明,总体而言,来自政府、非政府组织、竞争对手和媒体的压力与公司的气候变化风险应对呈正相关。细分分析显示,特定利益相关者群体的压力如何影响企业对物理风险的反应存在差异。关于公司治理结构,研究结果表明,董事会中女性的代表性和气候变化风险委员会的存在有助于公司加强对气候变化风险的应对。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corporate responses to climate change risks: evidence from Australia
ABSTRACT This study aims to (1) explore the extent to which Australian companies respond to regulatory, physical and market risks associated with climate change, and (2) examine the impact of stakeholder pressure and corporate governance structure on the extent of corporate response to these risks. We collected survey data from 120 top risk managers of Australian companies. Our analysis shows that companies respond to regulatory risks to a greater extent than to physical and market risks. With respect to the impact of stakeholder pressure, the results show that overall, pressure from government, non-governmental organisations, competitors, and the media are positively and significantly associated with companies’ climate change risk responses. Disaggregated analyses show differences in how particular stakeholder groups’ pressure affects the corporate response to physical risks. With respect to corporate governance structure, the results demonstrate that female representation on the board of directors and existence of a climate change risk committee facilitate companies’ increased climate change risk response.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信