PLS-SEM评估机器人和自动化部署的障碍,以实现有效的施工健康和安全

IF 2.2 Q3 MANAGEMENT
D. Aghimien, M. Ikuabe, Lerato Aghimien, C. Aigbavboa, Ntebo Ngcobo, J. Yankah
{"title":"PLS-SEM评估机器人和自动化部署的障碍,以实现有效的施工健康和安全","authors":"D. Aghimien, M. Ikuabe, Lerato Aghimien, C. Aigbavboa, Ntebo Ngcobo, J. Yankah","doi":"10.1108/jfm-04-2022-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe importance of robotics and automation (R&A) in delivering a safe built environment cannot be overemphasised. This is because R&A systems can execute a hazardous job function that the construction workforce may not execute. Based on this knowledge, this study aims to present the result of an assessment of the impediments to the deployment of R&A for a safe and healthy construction environment.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study adopted a post-positivist philosophical stance, using a quantitative research approach and a questionnaire administered to construction professionals in South Africa. The data gathered were analysed using frequency, percentage, mean item score, Kruskal–Wallis H-test, exploratory factor analysis and partial least square structural equation modelling (SEM).\n\n\nFindings\nThis study revealed that the impediments to the deployment of R&A could be grouped into: industry, technology, human and cost-related factors. However, SEM assessment showed that only the industry, human and cost-related factors would significantly impact attaining specific health and safety-related outcomes.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings offer valuable benefits to construction organisations as the careful understanding of the identified impeding factors can help lead to better deployment of R&A and the attainment of its inherent safety benefits.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study attempts to fill the gap in the shortage of literature exploring the deployment of R&A for a safe construction environment, particularly in developing countries like South Africa, where such studies are non-existent. This paper, therefore, offers a theoretical backdrop for future works on R&A deployment, particularly in developing countries where such a study has not been explored.\n","PeriodicalId":46544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Facilities Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PLS-SEM assessment of the impediments of robotics and automation deployment for effective construction health and safety\",\"authors\":\"D. Aghimien, M. Ikuabe, Lerato Aghimien, C. Aigbavboa, Ntebo Ngcobo, J. Yankah\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jfm-04-2022-0037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe importance of robotics and automation (R&A) in delivering a safe built environment cannot be overemphasised. This is because R&A systems can execute a hazardous job function that the construction workforce may not execute. Based on this knowledge, this study aims to present the result of an assessment of the impediments to the deployment of R&A for a safe and healthy construction environment.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study adopted a post-positivist philosophical stance, using a quantitative research approach and a questionnaire administered to construction professionals in South Africa. The data gathered were analysed using frequency, percentage, mean item score, Kruskal–Wallis H-test, exploratory factor analysis and partial least square structural equation modelling (SEM).\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis study revealed that the impediments to the deployment of R&A could be grouped into: industry, technology, human and cost-related factors. However, SEM assessment showed that only the industry, human and cost-related factors would significantly impact attaining specific health and safety-related outcomes.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe findings offer valuable benefits to construction organisations as the careful understanding of the identified impeding factors can help lead to better deployment of R&A and the attainment of its inherent safety benefits.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study attempts to fill the gap in the shortage of literature exploring the deployment of R&A for a safe construction environment, particularly in developing countries like South Africa, where such studies are non-existent. This paper, therefore, offers a theoretical backdrop for future works on R&A deployment, particularly in developing countries where such a study has not been explored.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Facilities Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Facilities Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfm-04-2022-0037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Facilities Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfm-04-2022-0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的机器人和自动化(R&A)在提供一个安全的建筑环境方面的重要性再怎么强调也不为过。这是因为R&A系统可以执行建筑工人可能无法执行的危险工作功能。基于这些知识,本研究旨在提供对为安全健康的施工环境部署R&A的障碍进行评估的结果。设计/方法论/方法本研究采用后实证主义哲学立场,采用定量研究方法和对南非建筑专业人员进行的问卷调查。使用频率、百分比、平均项目得分、Kruskal–Wallis H检验、探索性因素分析和偏最小二乘结构方程建模(SEM)对收集的数据进行分析。研究结果这项研究表明,R&A部署的障碍可以分为:行业、技术、人力和成本相关因素。然而,SEM评估显示,只有行业、人力和成本相关因素才会对实现特定的健康和安全相关结果产生重大影响。实际意义这些发现为建筑组织提供了宝贵的好处,因为仔细了解已确定的阻碍因素有助于更好地部署R&A并实现其固有的安全效益。原创性/价值这项研究试图填补探索为安全施工环境部署R&A的文献短缺的空白,特别是在南非等发展中国家,那里没有此类研究。因此,本文为未来研发部署工作提供了理论背景,特别是在尚未探索此类研究的发展中国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PLS-SEM assessment of the impediments of robotics and automation deployment for effective construction health and safety
Purpose The importance of robotics and automation (R&A) in delivering a safe built environment cannot be overemphasised. This is because R&A systems can execute a hazardous job function that the construction workforce may not execute. Based on this knowledge, this study aims to present the result of an assessment of the impediments to the deployment of R&A for a safe and healthy construction environment. Design/methodology/approach This study adopted a post-positivist philosophical stance, using a quantitative research approach and a questionnaire administered to construction professionals in South Africa. The data gathered were analysed using frequency, percentage, mean item score, Kruskal–Wallis H-test, exploratory factor analysis and partial least square structural equation modelling (SEM). Findings This study revealed that the impediments to the deployment of R&A could be grouped into: industry, technology, human and cost-related factors. However, SEM assessment showed that only the industry, human and cost-related factors would significantly impact attaining specific health and safety-related outcomes. Practical implications The findings offer valuable benefits to construction organisations as the careful understanding of the identified impeding factors can help lead to better deployment of R&A and the attainment of its inherent safety benefits. Originality/value This study attempts to fill the gap in the shortage of literature exploring the deployment of R&A for a safe construction environment, particularly in developing countries like South Africa, where such studies are non-existent. This paper, therefore, offers a theoretical backdrop for future works on R&A deployment, particularly in developing countries where such a study has not been explored.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.80%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Journal of Facilities Management is a strategic level journal for Heads of Facilities and Corporate Real Estate. Guided by its international and expert Editorial Board, Journal of Facilities Management publishes high-quality, authoritative, and detailed analysis, briefings and case studies on how facilities can and do play a vital part in helping deliver corporate strategy. This quarterly publication features contributions from leading practitioners and thinkers in the field of Facilities Management, from some of the leading companies, government institutions, and universities in the world. The journal features a combination of theoretical and practical articles, complemented by a wide range of case studies and regular features, identifying key implications for senior practitioners in Facilities Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信