斯里兰卡自由民主制度下的民族统治

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
R. Venugopal
{"title":"斯里兰卡自由民主制度下的民族统治","authors":"R. Venugopal","doi":"10.1080/00472336.2022.2105739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How is ethnic domination produced, legitimised, and sustained under conditions of liberal democracy? This paper engages with this problem and provides a reconceptualisation that draws on the experience of Sri Lanka. Ethnic domination is typically understood in terms of a liberal normative framework, through the lens of the state, or primarily in terms of the one-sided coercive power of the dominant group. This paper points instead to the importance of looking into inner processes, moral frameworks, and the way these are acted upon by contending ethnic groups. Instead of outcome typologies such as “ ethnic democracy ” and “ ethnocracy ” , it emphasises the need to look beyond and below the state, and in particular, at the mechanisms through which stable hierarchies are produced.","PeriodicalId":47420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethnic Domination under Liberal Democracy in Sri Lanka\",\"authors\":\"R. Venugopal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00472336.2022.2105739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How is ethnic domination produced, legitimised, and sustained under conditions of liberal democracy? This paper engages with this problem and provides a reconceptualisation that draws on the experience of Sri Lanka. Ethnic domination is typically understood in terms of a liberal normative framework, through the lens of the state, or primarily in terms of the one-sided coercive power of the dominant group. This paper points instead to the importance of looking into inner processes, moral frameworks, and the way these are acted upon by contending ethnic groups. Instead of outcome typologies such as “ ethnic democracy ” and “ ethnocracy ” , it emphasises the need to look beyond and below the state, and in particular, at the mechanisms through which stable hierarchies are produced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Asia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2022.2105739\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Asia","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2022.2105739","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在自由民主的条件下,种族统治是如何产生、合法化和持续的?本文探讨了这个问题,并借鉴斯里兰卡的经验对其进行了重新定义。民族统治通常是从自由规范框架的角度来理解的,通过国家的视角来理解,或者主要是从占主导地位的群体的单方面强制性来理解。相反,本文指出了研究内部过程、道德框架的重要性,以及相互竞争的种族群体对这些过程和框架的行为方式。与“种族民主”和“民族政治”等结果类型论不同,它强调需要超越和超越国家,特别是关注产生稳定等级制度的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethnic Domination under Liberal Democracy in Sri Lanka
How is ethnic domination produced, legitimised, and sustained under conditions of liberal democracy? This paper engages with this problem and provides a reconceptualisation that draws on the experience of Sri Lanka. Ethnic domination is typically understood in terms of a liberal normative framework, through the lens of the state, or primarily in terms of the one-sided coercive power of the dominant group. This paper points instead to the importance of looking into inner processes, moral frameworks, and the way these are acted upon by contending ethnic groups. Instead of outcome typologies such as “ ethnic democracy ” and “ ethnocracy ” , it emphasises the need to look beyond and below the state, and in particular, at the mechanisms through which stable hierarchies are produced.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Asia is an established refereed publication, it appears quarterly and has done so since 1970. When the journal was established, it was conceived as providing an alternative to mainstream perspectives on contemporary Asian issues. The journal maintains this tradition and seeks to publish articles that deal with the broad problems of economic, political and social development of Asia. Articles on economic development issues, political economy, agriculture, planning, the working class, people"s movements, politics and power, imperialism and empire, international financial institutions, the environment, and economic history are especially welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信