Noble Sissle和Eubie Blake:《美国音乐乱舞》第29卷。《美国音乐最新研究》第85卷。林申贝克和劳伦斯·申贝克编辑。威斯康星州米德尔顿:A-R版,2018。

IF 0.2 1区 艺术学 N/A MUSIC
Susan C. Cook
{"title":"Noble Sissle和Eubie Blake:《美国音乐乱舞》第29卷。《美国音乐最新研究》第85卷。林申贝克和劳伦斯·申贝克编辑。威斯康星州米德尔顿:A-R版,2018。","authors":"Susan C. Cook","doi":"10.1017/S1752196322000049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ship, which tends to disassociate country music (and especially rockabilly) from its roots in the musical practices of Black Americans. Part 3 turns to Nashville in the 1940s and 1950s, focusing on Kitty Wells and the rise of women’s honky-tonk. Chapter 6 details how performers such as Wells, Goldie Hill, and Jean Shepard musically “destabilized the ideals of the private sphere” and voiced “the yearnings of working-class women,” thus contending with class prejudice against the dominant framework of domesticity (154). Vander Wel draws attention to ideological divisions between the masculine honky-tonk and feminine home, framing narratives about women in honky-tonk and emphasizing that Wells and her peers “complicated the constraints of working-class womanhood” by leveraging performances of feminine identity with agency (163–64). Chapter 7 focuses on marketing in country music, fleshing out how the industry’s ongoing “pursuit of respectability” was shaped by female musicians beginning in the 1950s (175). The country music industry has continually strived for commercial acceptance, and the women who participate have required what Vander Wel describes as a “model of propriety” to succeed (179). Kitty Wells’s publicity materials serve as an example of this, portraying her both as a “good woman” and a good musician (180). Vander Wel chronicles how the industry began selling itself to a white middle-class audience through these marketing practices, shifting away from the poor, working-class, low-brow status it had gained from its days of barn dance radio programming and honky-tonk styles in the 1930s and 1940s. The book concludes by outlining country music’s attachment to female domesticity and propriety in the present day, describing how the vocal parodies of Lulu Belle, Maddox, and even Kitty Wells have continued with performers like Loretta Lynn, Dolly Parton, The Chicks, Miranda Lambert, and Gretchen Wilson. Vander Wel indicates that women in country music today use their voices to offer audiences insight into the contested spheres of class and gender that shape the “shifting demographics of the twentieth-first century” (197). Well written and deeply insightful, Vander Wel’s study sheds light on how women in country music have used their voices to represent the intricate relationships between class, gender, and region in the United States.","PeriodicalId":42557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for American Music","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noble Sissle and Eubie Blake: Shuffle Along Music of the United States Volume 29. Recent Researches in American Music Volume 85. Edited by Lyn Schenbeck and Lawrence Schenbeck. Middleton, WI: A-R Editions, 2018.\",\"authors\":\"Susan C. Cook\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1752196322000049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ship, which tends to disassociate country music (and especially rockabilly) from its roots in the musical practices of Black Americans. Part 3 turns to Nashville in the 1940s and 1950s, focusing on Kitty Wells and the rise of women’s honky-tonk. Chapter 6 details how performers such as Wells, Goldie Hill, and Jean Shepard musically “destabilized the ideals of the private sphere” and voiced “the yearnings of working-class women,” thus contending with class prejudice against the dominant framework of domesticity (154). Vander Wel draws attention to ideological divisions between the masculine honky-tonk and feminine home, framing narratives about women in honky-tonk and emphasizing that Wells and her peers “complicated the constraints of working-class womanhood” by leveraging performances of feminine identity with agency (163–64). Chapter 7 focuses on marketing in country music, fleshing out how the industry’s ongoing “pursuit of respectability” was shaped by female musicians beginning in the 1950s (175). The country music industry has continually strived for commercial acceptance, and the women who participate have required what Vander Wel describes as a “model of propriety” to succeed (179). Kitty Wells’s publicity materials serve as an example of this, portraying her both as a “good woman” and a good musician (180). Vander Wel chronicles how the industry began selling itself to a white middle-class audience through these marketing practices, shifting away from the poor, working-class, low-brow status it had gained from its days of barn dance radio programming and honky-tonk styles in the 1930s and 1940s. The book concludes by outlining country music’s attachment to female domesticity and propriety in the present day, describing how the vocal parodies of Lulu Belle, Maddox, and even Kitty Wells have continued with performers like Loretta Lynn, Dolly Parton, The Chicks, Miranda Lambert, and Gretchen Wilson. Vander Wel indicates that women in country music today use their voices to offer audiences insight into the contested spheres of class and gender that shape the “shifting demographics of the twentieth-first century” (197). Well written and deeply insightful, Vander Wel’s study sheds light on how women in country music have used their voices to represent the intricate relationships between class, gender, and region in the United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Society for American Music\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Society for American Music\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752196322000049\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for American Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752196322000049","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

船,它倾向于将乡村音乐(尤其是摇滚乐)与美国黑人音乐实践的根源脱钩。第三部分转向20世纪40年代和50年代的纳什维尔,聚焦于基蒂·威尔斯和女性朋克的兴起。第6章详细介绍了威尔斯、戈尔迪·希尔和让·谢泼德等表演者如何在音乐上“破坏私人领域的理想”,并表达了“工人阶级女性的渴望”,从而与阶级偏见对抗家庭生活的主导框架(154)。Vander Wel提请人们注意男性酒馆和女性家庭之间的意识形态分歧,构建了关于酒馆女性的叙事,并强调威尔斯和她的同龄人通过利用女性身份和代理的表现“使工人阶级女性的约束变得复杂”(163-64)。第7章侧重于乡村音乐的营销,详细阐述了从20世纪50年代开始,女性音乐家是如何塑造该行业持续的“追求体面”的(175)。乡村音乐行业一直在努力争取商业认可,参与其中的女性需要范德威尔所说的“得体的典范”才能成功(179)。基蒂·威尔斯的宣传材料就是一个例子,将她描绘成一个“好女人”和一个好音乐家(180)。Vander Wel记录了该行业是如何通过这些营销实践开始向白人中产阶级受众推销自己的,摆脱了20世纪30年代和40年代从谷仓舞广播节目和朋克风格中获得的贫穷、工人阶级、低学历的地位。这本书最后概述了乡村音乐对当今女性家庭生活和礼仪的依恋,描述了露露·贝尔、马多克斯,甚至基蒂·威尔斯的声乐模仿是如何与洛蕾塔·林恩、多莉·帕顿、小鸡乐队、米兰达·兰伯特和格雷琴·威尔逊等表演者一起继续的。Vander Wel指出,如今乡村音乐中的女性用她们的声音让观众深入了解阶级和性别的争议领域,这些领域塑造了“二十一世纪不断变化的人口结构”(197)。Vander Wel的研究文笔优美,见解深刻,揭示了乡村音乐中的女性如何用自己的声音来代表美国阶级、性别和地区之间的复杂关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Noble Sissle and Eubie Blake: Shuffle Along Music of the United States Volume 29. Recent Researches in American Music Volume 85. Edited by Lyn Schenbeck and Lawrence Schenbeck. Middleton, WI: A-R Editions, 2018.
ship, which tends to disassociate country music (and especially rockabilly) from its roots in the musical practices of Black Americans. Part 3 turns to Nashville in the 1940s and 1950s, focusing on Kitty Wells and the rise of women’s honky-tonk. Chapter 6 details how performers such as Wells, Goldie Hill, and Jean Shepard musically “destabilized the ideals of the private sphere” and voiced “the yearnings of working-class women,” thus contending with class prejudice against the dominant framework of domesticity (154). Vander Wel draws attention to ideological divisions between the masculine honky-tonk and feminine home, framing narratives about women in honky-tonk and emphasizing that Wells and her peers “complicated the constraints of working-class womanhood” by leveraging performances of feminine identity with agency (163–64). Chapter 7 focuses on marketing in country music, fleshing out how the industry’s ongoing “pursuit of respectability” was shaped by female musicians beginning in the 1950s (175). The country music industry has continually strived for commercial acceptance, and the women who participate have required what Vander Wel describes as a “model of propriety” to succeed (179). Kitty Wells’s publicity materials serve as an example of this, portraying her both as a “good woman” and a good musician (180). Vander Wel chronicles how the industry began selling itself to a white middle-class audience through these marketing practices, shifting away from the poor, working-class, low-brow status it had gained from its days of barn dance radio programming and honky-tonk styles in the 1930s and 1940s. The book concludes by outlining country music’s attachment to female domesticity and propriety in the present day, describing how the vocal parodies of Lulu Belle, Maddox, and even Kitty Wells have continued with performers like Loretta Lynn, Dolly Parton, The Chicks, Miranda Lambert, and Gretchen Wilson. Vander Wel indicates that women in country music today use their voices to offer audiences insight into the contested spheres of class and gender that shape the “shifting demographics of the twentieth-first century” (197). Well written and deeply insightful, Vander Wel’s study sheds light on how women in country music have used their voices to represent the intricate relationships between class, gender, and region in the United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信