Paula L.McGee,Brand®新神学:T.D.Jakes和新黑人教会的沃尔玛化

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
A. Smith
{"title":"Paula L.McGee,Brand®新神学:T.D.Jakes和新黑人教会的沃尔玛化","authors":"A. Smith","doi":"10.1177/00346373221109857i","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"one thing but many things organized around attention, affection, and resistance, each aiming, each navigating—each a design that designs” (p. 49). He asks the reader to consider the work of formation and what captivates their attention, moves them toward affection, and calls them to resistance. Chapter 3 focuses on the work of building educational institutions. Jennings uses a rendering of African American worship on a plantation as an image of Western education, writing, “All theological education in the Western world is haunted by this illustration: a plantation at worship and an enslaved preacher” (p. 82). He argues that Western educational institutions, including theological ones, have not dealt with issues of race because much of the bias is unconscious. He goes on to raise difficult but vital questions aimed at enabling readers to rethink the purpose of institutional life together. In chapter 4, Jennings addresses what shared institutional life could look like “by reframing the daily operations of a school inside a new vision of edification” (p. 105). In the final chapter, Jennings notes, “Theological education is in the midst of an epic struggle” (p. 153). He writes that this struggle, however, is not about institutional survival, stainable financial models, or best pedagogical practices. Jennings insists that, while all of these issues are important, “They are not where the struggle meets us or from where the vision of our futures will come” (p. 154). Jennings goes on to ask, “What would it mean to be a professor who thinks the gathering differently in a school that thinks it differently?” (p. 139). And here is the hope. Jennings writes that Jesus called the crowd so that through his life and teachings, they might be formed into seeing themselves, others, and their world differently. And just as those in the crowd were offered the good news of new life together, those in theological education today “can start again. The ‘again’ being a gift from the God who raised Jesus from the dead. Theological education exists in the ‘again’” (p. 151). While this book is written most directly for those involved in theological education, Jennings’ critique importantly extends more broadly to Western education in general. The United States is in the midst of a racial reckoning, with Black and Brown bodies dying while some continue to argue that systemic racism does not exist. Anyone involved in the work of Christian formation can benefit from Jennings’ writing because it questions the very reason and goal of formation itself: is it to further belief in the power and control of white, masculine self-sufficiency or is it to cultivate a desire for community and a diversity of voices, each one sharing their fragments and open to receiving the gift of the fragments that others have to offer, “a treasure that would move us toward a true maturity that is a way of life together, a way that forms new life together” (p. 152).","PeriodicalId":21049,"journal":{"name":"Review & Expositor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paula L. McGee, Brand® New Theology: The Wal-Martization of T. D. Jakes and the New Black Churc\",\"authors\":\"A. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00346373221109857i\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"one thing but many things organized around attention, affection, and resistance, each aiming, each navigating—each a design that designs” (p. 49). He asks the reader to consider the work of formation and what captivates their attention, moves them toward affection, and calls them to resistance. Chapter 3 focuses on the work of building educational institutions. Jennings uses a rendering of African American worship on a plantation as an image of Western education, writing, “All theological education in the Western world is haunted by this illustration: a plantation at worship and an enslaved preacher” (p. 82). He argues that Western educational institutions, including theological ones, have not dealt with issues of race because much of the bias is unconscious. He goes on to raise difficult but vital questions aimed at enabling readers to rethink the purpose of institutional life together. In chapter 4, Jennings addresses what shared institutional life could look like “by reframing the daily operations of a school inside a new vision of edification” (p. 105). In the final chapter, Jennings notes, “Theological education is in the midst of an epic struggle” (p. 153). He writes that this struggle, however, is not about institutional survival, stainable financial models, or best pedagogical practices. Jennings insists that, while all of these issues are important, “They are not where the struggle meets us or from where the vision of our futures will come” (p. 154). Jennings goes on to ask, “What would it mean to be a professor who thinks the gathering differently in a school that thinks it differently?” (p. 139). And here is the hope. Jennings writes that Jesus called the crowd so that through his life and teachings, they might be formed into seeing themselves, others, and their world differently. And just as those in the crowd were offered the good news of new life together, those in theological education today “can start again. The ‘again’ being a gift from the God who raised Jesus from the dead. Theological education exists in the ‘again’” (p. 151). While this book is written most directly for those involved in theological education, Jennings’ critique importantly extends more broadly to Western education in general. The United States is in the midst of a racial reckoning, with Black and Brown bodies dying while some continue to argue that systemic racism does not exist. Anyone involved in the work of Christian formation can benefit from Jennings’ writing because it questions the very reason and goal of formation itself: is it to further belief in the power and control of white, masculine self-sufficiency or is it to cultivate a desire for community and a diversity of voices, each one sharing their fragments and open to receiving the gift of the fragments that others have to offer, “a treasure that would move us toward a true maturity that is a way of life together, a way that forms new life together” (p. 152).\",\"PeriodicalId\":21049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review & Expositor\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review & Expositor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00346373221109857i\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review & Expositor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00346373221109857i","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一件事,但许多事情围绕着关注、情感和抵抗组织起来,每一个目标,每一个导航——每一个设计都是设计的”(第49页)。他要求读者思考形成的工作,以及是什么吸引了他们的注意力,使他们走向情感,并召唤他们反抗。第三章重点论述了教育机构建设工作。詹宁斯用非洲裔美国人在种植园里的崇拜作为西方教育的形象,他写道:“西方世界的所有神学教育都被这个例子所困扰:一个种植园的崇拜和一个被奴役的传教士”(第82页)。他认为,西方教育机构,包括神学机构,没有处理种族问题,因为大部分偏见是无意识的。他接着提出了一些困难但至关重要的问题,旨在让读者一起重新思考制度生活的目的。在第4章中,詹宁斯阐述了共享的机构生活可能是什么样子,“通过在一种新的教育视野中重构学校的日常运作”(第105页)。在最后一章,詹宁斯指出,“神学教育正处于一场史诗般的斗争之中”(153页)。他写道,然而,这场斗争与机构生存、可持续的财务模式或最佳教学实践无关。詹宁斯坚持认为,虽然所有这些问题都很重要,但“它们不是斗争与我们相遇的地方,也不是我们未来的愿景将来自哪里”(第154页)。詹宁斯接着问道:“在一个对集会持不同看法的学校里,作为一个对集会持不同看法的教授,这意味着什么?(第139页)。希望就在这里。詹宁斯写道,耶稣呼召众人,是为了通过他的生活和教导,让他们以不同的眼光看待自己、他人和世界。正如那些在人群中一起获得新生命的好消息一样,那些今天接受神学教育的人“可以重新开始”。“再”是上帝的礼物,他使耶稣从死里复活。神学教育存在于‘再次’中”(第151页)。虽然这本书最直接地是为那些参与神学教育的人写的,但詹宁斯的批评更重要地扩展到更广泛的西方教育。美国正处于一场种族清算之中,黑人和棕色人种的尸体正在死去,而一些人继续辩称,系统性的种族主义并不存在。任何参与基督教培育工作的人都可以从詹宁斯的作品中受益,因为它质疑了培育本身的原因和目标:它是为了进一步相信白人男性自给自足的力量和控制,还是为了培养对社区和多样化声音的渴望,每个人都分享他们的碎片,并接受其他人提供的碎片的礼物,“这是一种宝藏,它将使我们走向真正的成熟,这是一种共同生活的方式,一种共同形成新生活的方式”(第152页)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paula L. McGee, Brand® New Theology: The Wal-Martization of T. D. Jakes and the New Black Churc
one thing but many things organized around attention, affection, and resistance, each aiming, each navigating—each a design that designs” (p. 49). He asks the reader to consider the work of formation and what captivates their attention, moves them toward affection, and calls them to resistance. Chapter 3 focuses on the work of building educational institutions. Jennings uses a rendering of African American worship on a plantation as an image of Western education, writing, “All theological education in the Western world is haunted by this illustration: a plantation at worship and an enslaved preacher” (p. 82). He argues that Western educational institutions, including theological ones, have not dealt with issues of race because much of the bias is unconscious. He goes on to raise difficult but vital questions aimed at enabling readers to rethink the purpose of institutional life together. In chapter 4, Jennings addresses what shared institutional life could look like “by reframing the daily operations of a school inside a new vision of edification” (p. 105). In the final chapter, Jennings notes, “Theological education is in the midst of an epic struggle” (p. 153). He writes that this struggle, however, is not about institutional survival, stainable financial models, or best pedagogical practices. Jennings insists that, while all of these issues are important, “They are not where the struggle meets us or from where the vision of our futures will come” (p. 154). Jennings goes on to ask, “What would it mean to be a professor who thinks the gathering differently in a school that thinks it differently?” (p. 139). And here is the hope. Jennings writes that Jesus called the crowd so that through his life and teachings, they might be formed into seeing themselves, others, and their world differently. And just as those in the crowd were offered the good news of new life together, those in theological education today “can start again. The ‘again’ being a gift from the God who raised Jesus from the dead. Theological education exists in the ‘again’” (p. 151). While this book is written most directly for those involved in theological education, Jennings’ critique importantly extends more broadly to Western education in general. The United States is in the midst of a racial reckoning, with Black and Brown bodies dying while some continue to argue that systemic racism does not exist. Anyone involved in the work of Christian formation can benefit from Jennings’ writing because it questions the very reason and goal of formation itself: is it to further belief in the power and control of white, masculine self-sufficiency or is it to cultivate a desire for community and a diversity of voices, each one sharing their fragments and open to receiving the gift of the fragments that others have to offer, “a treasure that would move us toward a true maturity that is a way of life together, a way that forms new life together” (p. 152).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review & Expositor
Review & Expositor RELIGION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信