扰乱生物钟:生育益处,卵子冷冻和主动生育管理

Q1 Social Sciences
Lucy van de Wiel
{"title":"扰乱生物钟:生育益处,卵子冷冻和主动生育管理","authors":"Lucy van de Wiel","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the last decade, the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) sector has witnessed a shift from so-called ‘reactive IVF’ to a new model of proactive fertility care. Whereas IVF was traditionally developed to treat people who found they were unable to conceive, the indication for IVF has broadened significantly to include a much wider group of potential patients through a new focus on proactive treatment of future (in)fertilities. This shift combines a number of new trends pertaining to preservation, prediction, private equity and platformization, all of which have gained influence in contemporary assisted reproduction. This article focuses on the emergence of company-sponsored fertility benefits, which combines each of these trends.</p><p>Whereas fertility benefits – especially egg freezing insurance – have primarily been discussed in terms of women’s empowerment or disenfranchisement, this article instead calls attention to the discursive, clinical and infrastructural shifts in contemporary assisted reproduction that have emerged with the rising popularity of these benefits. The analysis addresses these underdiscussed aspects of fertility benefits by focusing on the dynamics of<!--> <!-->demand; the shifts in the rationalization of intensified treatment pathways<!--> <!-->in the face of new reimbursement practices; and the online, platform-based infrastructures that are built to provide these treatments.<!--> <!-->In doing so, it analyses how this remaking of fertility towards an ethos of proactive fertility management reflects broader capitalist tailwinds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 239-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661821000393/pdfft?md5=e21b0f574b49c26c1228ecc8136b7a48&pid=1-s2.0-S2405661821000393-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disrupting the biological clock: Fertility benefits, egg freezing and proactive fertility management\",\"authors\":\"Lucy van de Wiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the last decade, the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) sector has witnessed a shift from so-called ‘reactive IVF’ to a new model of proactive fertility care. Whereas IVF was traditionally developed to treat people who found they were unable to conceive, the indication for IVF has broadened significantly to include a much wider group of potential patients through a new focus on proactive treatment of future (in)fertilities. This shift combines a number of new trends pertaining to preservation, prediction, private equity and platformization, all of which have gained influence in contemporary assisted reproduction. This article focuses on the emergence of company-sponsored fertility benefits, which combines each of these trends.</p><p>Whereas fertility benefits – especially egg freezing insurance – have primarily been discussed in terms of women’s empowerment or disenfranchisement, this article instead calls attention to the discursive, clinical and infrastructural shifts in contemporary assisted reproduction that have emerged with the rising popularity of these benefits. The analysis addresses these underdiscussed aspects of fertility benefits by focusing on the dynamics of<!--> <!-->demand; the shifts in the rationalization of intensified treatment pathways<!--> <!-->in the face of new reimbursement practices; and the online, platform-based infrastructures that are built to provide these treatments.<!--> <!-->In doing so, it analyses how this remaking of fertility towards an ethos of proactive fertility management reflects broader capitalist tailwinds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 239-250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661821000393/pdfft?md5=e21b0f574b49c26c1228ecc8136b7a48&pid=1-s2.0-S2405661821000393-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661821000393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661821000393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的十年中,体外受精(IVF)行业见证了从所谓的“反应性体外受精”到主动生育护理的新模式的转变。传统上,体外受精是用于治疗那些发现自己无法怀孕的人,而现在,体外受精的适应症已经大大扩大,通过对未来生育能力的积极治疗,包括了更广泛的潜在患者群体。这一转变结合了许多与保存、预测、私募股权和平台化有关的新趋势,所有这些趋势都对当代辅助生殖产生了影响。本文主要关注公司赞助的生育福利的出现,它结合了这些趋势。鉴于生育福利——尤其是卵子冷冻保险——主要是从赋予妇女权力或剥夺妇女权利的角度来讨论的,这篇文章转而关注当代辅助生殖的话语、临床和基础设施的转变,这些转变随着这些福利的日益普及而出现。该分析通过关注需求的动态来解决这些未被充分讨论的生育效益方面;面对新的报销做法,强化治疗途径合理化的转变;以及为提供这些治疗而建立的基于平台的在线基础设施。在此过程中,它分析了这种将生育率重塑为积极主动的生育率管理精神的做法如何反映了更广泛的资本主义顺风。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disrupting the biological clock: Fertility benefits, egg freezing and proactive fertility management

In the last decade, the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) sector has witnessed a shift from so-called ‘reactive IVF’ to a new model of proactive fertility care. Whereas IVF was traditionally developed to treat people who found they were unable to conceive, the indication for IVF has broadened significantly to include a much wider group of potential patients through a new focus on proactive treatment of future (in)fertilities. This shift combines a number of new trends pertaining to preservation, prediction, private equity and platformization, all of which have gained influence in contemporary assisted reproduction. This article focuses on the emergence of company-sponsored fertility benefits, which combines each of these trends.

Whereas fertility benefits – especially egg freezing insurance – have primarily been discussed in terms of women’s empowerment or disenfranchisement, this article instead calls attention to the discursive, clinical and infrastructural shifts in contemporary assisted reproduction that have emerged with the rising popularity of these benefits. The analysis addresses these underdiscussed aspects of fertility benefits by focusing on the dynamics of demand; the shifts in the rationalization of intensified treatment pathways in the face of new reimbursement practices; and the online, platform-based infrastructures that are built to provide these treatments. In doing so, it analyses how this remaking of fertility towards an ethos of proactive fertility management reflects broader capitalist tailwinds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: RBMS is a new journal dedicated to interdisciplinary discussion and debate of the rapidly expanding field of reproductive biomedicine, particularly all of its many societal and cultural implications. It is intended to bring to attention new research in the social sciences, arts and humanities on human reproduction, new reproductive technologies, and related areas such as human embryonic stem cell derivation. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, policy makers, academics and patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信