{"title":"不同光谱特性的荧光灯对水生和陆生成虫捕获物的比较","authors":"Stephen R. Pohe, M. Winterbourn, J. Harding","doi":"10.1080/00779962.2017.1398704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The effectiveness of four different fluorescent light sources, used to attract adult aquatic insects (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera) and co-occurring terrestrial insects (Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera), was investigated. Blacklight (BL), blacklight-blue (BLB), cold white light (CW) and a blacklight/cold white light (BL/CW) combination were compared in a field trial with a fully-crossed factorial design. Each light treatment was also assessed at two levels of power (intensity): 16 W and 32 W. All light treatments attracted insects belonging to the six orders, but on average BLB and BL caught nearly 3 times more aquatic insects than CW, and about 1.5 times more terrestrial insects. The combination lights generally attracted intermediate catch numbers. Overall, BLB was most effective for attracting Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera, whereas BL attracted the most terrestrial insects, particularly Lepidoptera. Doubling the number of lights generally resulted in larger catches, but not significantly so (P > 0.05). We recommend that BLB lights be used in studies of adult aquatic insects because they are as effective as regular BL and appear to reduce the likelihood of attracting non-target terrestrial species; a favourable outcome with regard to faunal conservation and, more practically, sample sorting. Our results suggest that, for studies in remote locations, 16 W of light should be sufficient to obtain reasonable catches and, importantly, reduce the need to carry additional equipment, including heavy batteries.","PeriodicalId":19185,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Entomologist","volume":"41 1","pages":"1 - 11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00779962.2017.1398704","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of fluorescent lights with differing spectral properties on catches of adult aquatic and terrestrial insects\",\"authors\":\"Stephen R. Pohe, M. Winterbourn, J. Harding\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00779962.2017.1398704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The effectiveness of four different fluorescent light sources, used to attract adult aquatic insects (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera) and co-occurring terrestrial insects (Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera), was investigated. Blacklight (BL), blacklight-blue (BLB), cold white light (CW) and a blacklight/cold white light (BL/CW) combination were compared in a field trial with a fully-crossed factorial design. Each light treatment was also assessed at two levels of power (intensity): 16 W and 32 W. All light treatments attracted insects belonging to the six orders, but on average BLB and BL caught nearly 3 times more aquatic insects than CW, and about 1.5 times more terrestrial insects. The combination lights generally attracted intermediate catch numbers. Overall, BLB was most effective for attracting Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera, whereas BL attracted the most terrestrial insects, particularly Lepidoptera. Doubling the number of lights generally resulted in larger catches, but not significantly so (P > 0.05). We recommend that BLB lights be used in studies of adult aquatic insects because they are as effective as regular BL and appear to reduce the likelihood of attracting non-target terrestrial species; a favourable outcome with regard to faunal conservation and, more practically, sample sorting. Our results suggest that, for studies in remote locations, 16 W of light should be sufficient to obtain reasonable catches and, importantly, reduce the need to carry additional equipment, including heavy batteries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand Entomologist\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00779962.2017.1398704\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand Entomologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00779962.2017.1398704\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Entomologist","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00779962.2017.1398704","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of fluorescent lights with differing spectral properties on catches of adult aquatic and terrestrial insects
ABSTRACT The effectiveness of four different fluorescent light sources, used to attract adult aquatic insects (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera) and co-occurring terrestrial insects (Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera), was investigated. Blacklight (BL), blacklight-blue (BLB), cold white light (CW) and a blacklight/cold white light (BL/CW) combination were compared in a field trial with a fully-crossed factorial design. Each light treatment was also assessed at two levels of power (intensity): 16 W and 32 W. All light treatments attracted insects belonging to the six orders, but on average BLB and BL caught nearly 3 times more aquatic insects than CW, and about 1.5 times more terrestrial insects. The combination lights generally attracted intermediate catch numbers. Overall, BLB was most effective for attracting Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera, whereas BL attracted the most terrestrial insects, particularly Lepidoptera. Doubling the number of lights generally resulted in larger catches, but not significantly so (P > 0.05). We recommend that BLB lights be used in studies of adult aquatic insects because they are as effective as regular BL and appear to reduce the likelihood of attracting non-target terrestrial species; a favourable outcome with regard to faunal conservation and, more practically, sample sorting. Our results suggest that, for studies in remote locations, 16 W of light should be sufficient to obtain reasonable catches and, importantly, reduce the need to carry additional equipment, including heavy batteries.
期刊介绍:
The invertebrate diversity of New Zealand is of great interest worldwide because of its geographic isolation and geological history. The New Zealand Entomologist plays an important role in disseminating information on field-based, experimental, and theoretical research.
The New Zealand Entomologist publishes original research papers, review papers and short communications. We welcome submissions in all aspects of science regarding insects and arthropods in a New Zealand or Australasian setting. The journal’s subject matter encompasses taxonomy, phylogenetics, biogeography, biological control and pest management, conservation, ecology and natural history.
The journal is the official publication of the Entomological Society of New Zealand. Papers published or submitted elsewhere for publication will not be considered, but publication of an abstract or summary elsewhere (e.g. conference proceedings) does not preclude full publication in the New Zealand Entomologist. Accepted papers become copyright of the Entomological Society of New Zealand. The journal is published in English, but we also welcome publication of abstracts in Maori.