使用基因表达数据评估存在异常值的不同机器学习算法的性能

M. Shahjaman, M. Rashid, M. Asifuzzaman, H. Akter, S. Islam, M. Mollah
{"title":"使用基因表达数据评估存在异常值的不同机器学习算法的性能","authors":"M. Shahjaman, M. Rashid, M. Asifuzzaman, H. Akter, S. Islam, M. Mollah","doi":"10.3329/jbs.v28i0.44712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classification of samples into one or more populations is one of the main objectives of gene expression data (GED) analysis. Many machine learning algorithms were employed in several studies to perform this task. However, these studies did not consider the outliers problem. GEDs are often contaminated by outliers due to several steps involve in the data generating process from hybridization of DNA samples to image analysis. Most of the algorithms produce higher false positives and lower accuracies in presence of outliers, particularly for lower number of replicates in the biological conditions. Therefore, in this paper, a comprehensive study has been carried out among five popular machine learning algorithms (SVM, RF, Naive Bayes, k-NN and LDA) using both simulated and real gene expression datasets, in absence and presence of outliers. Three different rates of outliers (5%, 10% and 50%) and six performance indices (TPR, FPR, TNR, FNR, FDR and AUC) were considered to investigate the performance of five machine learning algorithms. Both simulated and real GED analysis results revealed that SVM produced comparatively better performance than the other four algorithms (RF, Naive Bayes, k-NN and LDA) for both small-and-large sample sizes. \nJ. bio-sci. 28: 69-80, 2020","PeriodicalId":90580,"journal":{"name":"Journal of bio-science","volume":"28 1","pages":"69-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3329/jbs.v28i0.44712","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of different machine learning algorithms in presence of outliers using gene expression data\",\"authors\":\"M. Shahjaman, M. Rashid, M. Asifuzzaman, H. Akter, S. Islam, M. Mollah\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/jbs.v28i0.44712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Classification of samples into one or more populations is one of the main objectives of gene expression data (GED) analysis. Many machine learning algorithms were employed in several studies to perform this task. However, these studies did not consider the outliers problem. GEDs are often contaminated by outliers due to several steps involve in the data generating process from hybridization of DNA samples to image analysis. Most of the algorithms produce higher false positives and lower accuracies in presence of outliers, particularly for lower number of replicates in the biological conditions. Therefore, in this paper, a comprehensive study has been carried out among five popular machine learning algorithms (SVM, RF, Naive Bayes, k-NN and LDA) using both simulated and real gene expression datasets, in absence and presence of outliers. Three different rates of outliers (5%, 10% and 50%) and six performance indices (TPR, FPR, TNR, FNR, FDR and AUC) were considered to investigate the performance of five machine learning algorithms. Both simulated and real GED analysis results revealed that SVM produced comparatively better performance than the other four algorithms (RF, Naive Bayes, k-NN and LDA) for both small-and-large sample sizes. \\nJ. bio-sci. 28: 69-80, 2020\",\"PeriodicalId\":90580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of bio-science\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"69-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3329/jbs.v28i0.44712\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of bio-science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbs.v28i0.44712\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of bio-science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbs.v28i0.44712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将样本分类为一个或多个群体是基因表达数据(GED)分析的主要目标之一。许多机器学习算法在几项研究中被用来执行这项任务。然而,这些研究没有考虑异常值问题。由于从DNA样本杂交到图像分析的数据生成过程涉及几个步骤,GED经常被异常值污染。大多数算法在存在异常值的情况下会产生更高的假阳性和更低的准确率,特别是在生物条件下重复次数较少的情况下。因此,在本文中,使用模拟和真实的基因表达数据集,在不存在和存在异常值的情况下,对五种流行的机器学习算法(SVM、RF、朴素贝叶斯、k-NN和LDA)进行了全面的研究。考虑了三种不同的异常率(5%、10%和50%)和六种性能指标(TPR、FPR、TNR、FNR、FDR和AUC)来研究五种机器学习算法的性能。模拟和实际GED分析结果都表明,无论是在小样本量还是在大样本量下,SVM都比其他四种算法(RF、Naive Bayes、k-NN和LDA)产生了相对更好的性能。生物科学杂志。2020年8月28日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation of different machine learning algorithms in presence of outliers using gene expression data
Classification of samples into one or more populations is one of the main objectives of gene expression data (GED) analysis. Many machine learning algorithms were employed in several studies to perform this task. However, these studies did not consider the outliers problem. GEDs are often contaminated by outliers due to several steps involve in the data generating process from hybridization of DNA samples to image analysis. Most of the algorithms produce higher false positives and lower accuracies in presence of outliers, particularly for lower number of replicates in the biological conditions. Therefore, in this paper, a comprehensive study has been carried out among five popular machine learning algorithms (SVM, RF, Naive Bayes, k-NN and LDA) using both simulated and real gene expression datasets, in absence and presence of outliers. Three different rates of outliers (5%, 10% and 50%) and six performance indices (TPR, FPR, TNR, FNR, FDR and AUC) were considered to investigate the performance of five machine learning algorithms. Both simulated and real GED analysis results revealed that SVM produced comparatively better performance than the other four algorithms (RF, Naive Bayes, k-NN and LDA) for both small-and-large sample sizes. J. bio-sci. 28: 69-80, 2020
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信