《尼米亚书》中“宙斯颂”的矛盾

IF 0.2 3区历史学 0 CLASSICS

CLASSICAL WORLD Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1353/clw.2023.0006

C. Waldo

{"title":"《尼米亚书》中“宙斯颂”的矛盾","authors":"C. Waldo","doi":"10.1353/clw.2023.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This article examines the opening lines of Pindar's Nemean 3, which present an interesting problem from the perspective of genre. Pindar characterizes the poem in question as a ὕμνος (11) to Zeus, contradicting the position that the singular purpose of epinician is the glorification of the victor. According to this view, it is impossible for one poem to be both an epinician to a man and a hymn to a deity. I argue that we can in fact understand Nemean 3 as, at least in part, a hymn to Zeus, since victory odes instantiate praise in relation to multiple audiences.","PeriodicalId":46369,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL WORLD","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Contradiction of the \\\"Hymn to Zeus\\\" in Nemean 3\",\"authors\":\"C. Waldo\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/clw.2023.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:This article examines the opening lines of Pindar's Nemean 3, which present an interesting problem from the perspective of genre. Pindar characterizes the poem in question as a ὕμνος (11) to Zeus, contradicting the position that the singular purpose of epinician is the glorification of the victor. According to this view, it is impossible for one poem to be both an epinician to a man and a hymn to a deity. I argue that we can in fact understand Nemean 3 as, at least in part, a hymn to Zeus, since victory odes instantiate praise in relation to multiple audiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CLASSICAL WORLD\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CLASSICAL WORLD\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/clw.2023.0006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL WORLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/clw.2023.0006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文从体裁的角度对品达的《尼米阿3》的首句进行了分析，提出了一个有趣的问题。品达把这首诗描述为献给宙斯的一篇ς μνος(11)，这与“epiniician的唯一目的是赞美胜利者”的观点相矛盾。根据这种观点，一首诗不可能既是对人的欣赏又是对神的赞美诗。我认为，事实上，我们可以把《尼米亚3》理解为，至少在某种程度上，是对宙斯的赞美诗，因为胜利颂歌体现了对多个听众的赞美。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Contradiction of the "Hymn to Zeus" in Nemean 3

ABSTRACT:This article examines the opening lines of Pindar's Nemean 3, which present an interesting problem from the perspective of genre. Pindar characterizes the poem in question as a ὕμνος (11) to Zeus, contradicting the position that the singular purpose of epinician is the glorification of the victor. According to this view, it is impossible for one poem to be both an epinician to a man and a hymn to a deity. I argue that we can in fact understand Nemean 3 as, at least in part, a hymn to Zeus, since victory odes instantiate praise in relation to multiple audiences.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

CLASSICAL WORLD CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Classical World (ISSN 0009-8418) is the quarterly journal of The Classical Association of the Atlantic States, published on a seasonal schedule with Fall (September-November), Winter (December-February), Spring (March-May), and Summer (June-August) issues. Begun in 1907 as The Classical Weekly, this peer-reviewed journal publishes contributions on all aspects of Greek and Roman literature, history, and society.