脐带血血小板凝胶治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效:一项双盲随机临床试验

Q1 Medicine
Seyedeh Esmat Hosseini , Behnam Molavi , Alireza Goodarzi , Ahad Alizadeh , Alireza Yousefzadeh , Niloofar Sodeifi , Leila Arab , Nasser Aghdami
{"title":"脐带血血小板凝胶治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效:一项双盲随机临床试验","authors":"Seyedeh Esmat Hosseini ,&nbsp;Behnam Molavi ,&nbsp;Alireza Goodarzi ,&nbsp;Ahad Alizadeh ,&nbsp;Alireza Yousefzadeh ,&nbsp;Niloofar Sodeifi ,&nbsp;Leila Arab ,&nbsp;Nasser Aghdami","doi":"10.1016/j.wndm.2020.100178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Type 2 diabetes is one of the most prevalent diseases throughout the world. The foot ulcers are severe complications of this disease. Foot ulcers induce the high rate of morbidity, impair </span>quality of life<span><span>, bring about extreme costs to health service providers, and give rise to waste of time. Recently, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet gel (PG) have been used for the treatment of chronic wounds. In the present randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, platelet gel derived from umbilical cord blood (UCB) was used to heal the </span>diabetic foot.</span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The patients were randomly divided into three groups, under the categories of PG, platelet-poor plasma (PPP) and lubricant gel (placebo) (ratio 1:1:1). The processes of gels application were launched for the subject of each group twice per week with 3–4 days’ interval. This mechanism protracted for eight weeks. After completion of 8 weeks, the patients were followed up after two weeks and then continued for nine months with one-month interval.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p><span>30 patients underwent statistical analysis. Except for diastolic blood pressure which was significant between groups, there were no statistically significant differences in patients’ baseline demographics. No significant differences were detected between groups at baseline of wounds (</span><em>P =</em> 0.09). The results revealed that there is no statistically significant interaction among three groups during follow-up time.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The present study provides evidence that there are no significant differences in the size of wound among PG, PPP, and placebo groups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38278,"journal":{"name":"Wound Medicine","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wndm.2020.100178","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of platelet gel derived from umbilical cord blood on diabetic foot ulcers: A double-blind randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Seyedeh Esmat Hosseini ,&nbsp;Behnam Molavi ,&nbsp;Alireza Goodarzi ,&nbsp;Ahad Alizadeh ,&nbsp;Alireza Yousefzadeh ,&nbsp;Niloofar Sodeifi ,&nbsp;Leila Arab ,&nbsp;Nasser Aghdami\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wndm.2020.100178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Type 2 diabetes is one of the most prevalent diseases throughout the world. The foot ulcers are severe complications of this disease. Foot ulcers induce the high rate of morbidity, impair </span>quality of life<span><span>, bring about extreme costs to health service providers, and give rise to waste of time. Recently, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet gel (PG) have been used for the treatment of chronic wounds. In the present randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, platelet gel derived from umbilical cord blood (UCB) was used to heal the </span>diabetic foot.</span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The patients were randomly divided into three groups, under the categories of PG, platelet-poor plasma (PPP) and lubricant gel (placebo) (ratio 1:1:1). The processes of gels application were launched for the subject of each group twice per week with 3–4 days’ interval. This mechanism protracted for eight weeks. After completion of 8 weeks, the patients were followed up after two weeks and then continued for nine months with one-month interval.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p><span>30 patients underwent statistical analysis. Except for diastolic blood pressure which was significant between groups, there were no statistically significant differences in patients’ baseline demographics. No significant differences were detected between groups at baseline of wounds (</span><em>P =</em> 0.09). The results revealed that there is no statistically significant interaction among three groups during follow-up time.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The present study provides evidence that there are no significant differences in the size of wound among PG, PPP, and placebo groups.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wound Medicine\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wndm.2020.100178\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wound Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213909520300021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213909520300021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

2型糖尿病是世界上最普遍的疾病之一。足部溃疡是这种疾病的严重并发症。足部溃疡导致高发病率,影响生活质量,给卫生服务提供者带来极高的成本,并造成时间浪费。近年来,富血小板血浆(PRP)和血小板凝胶(PG)已被用于慢性伤口的治疗。在目前的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,来自脐带血的血小板凝胶(UCB)被用于治疗糖尿病足。方法将患者随机分为PG组、贫血小板血浆组(PPP)组和润滑凝胶组(安慰剂组)(比例为1:1:1)。每组受试者启动凝胶涂抹过程,每周2次,间隔3-4天。这种机制持续了8个星期。8周结束后,每2周随访一次,每隔1个月随访9个月。结果对30例患者进行统计分析。除舒张压组间差异有统计学意义外,患者基线人口统计学差异无统计学意义。创面基线组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.09)。结果显示,在随访期间,三组之间没有统计学上显著的相互作用。结论本研究提供的证据表明,PG组、PPP组和安慰剂组在伤口大小上无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficacy of platelet gel derived from umbilical cord blood on diabetic foot ulcers: A double-blind randomized clinical trial

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes is one of the most prevalent diseases throughout the world. The foot ulcers are severe complications of this disease. Foot ulcers induce the high rate of morbidity, impair quality of life, bring about extreme costs to health service providers, and give rise to waste of time. Recently, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet gel (PG) have been used for the treatment of chronic wounds. In the present randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, platelet gel derived from umbilical cord blood (UCB) was used to heal the diabetic foot.

Method

The patients were randomly divided into three groups, under the categories of PG, platelet-poor plasma (PPP) and lubricant gel (placebo) (ratio 1:1:1). The processes of gels application were launched for the subject of each group twice per week with 3–4 days’ interval. This mechanism protracted for eight weeks. After completion of 8 weeks, the patients were followed up after two weeks and then continued for nine months with one-month interval.

Result

30 patients underwent statistical analysis. Except for diastolic blood pressure which was significant between groups, there were no statistically significant differences in patients’ baseline demographics. No significant differences were detected between groups at baseline of wounds (P = 0.09). The results revealed that there is no statistically significant interaction among three groups during follow-up time.

Conclusion

The present study provides evidence that there are no significant differences in the size of wound among PG, PPP, and placebo groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wound Medicine
Wound Medicine Medicine-Surgery
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信