诉讼调解在解决医患过失纠纷中的应用

Daffa Ladro Kusworo, Maghfira Nur Khaliza Fauzi
{"title":"诉讼调解在解决医患过失纠纷中的应用","authors":"Daffa Ladro Kusworo, Maghfira Nur Khaliza Fauzi","doi":"10.25041/aelr.v4i1.2858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Negligence in current medical disputes has not yet obtained legal settlement efforts for both parties, either between the patient, the medical staff, or the hospital. Efforts to resolve medical disputes can be done through two methods: litigation and non-litigation mediation. Determining a dispute resolution model with alternative efforts will minimize doctors' worries as well as stimulate medical personnel to improve the health system and existing errors will become an evaluation of health services later, especially also preventing doctors, patients and other parties from being confronted until a court decision actually damages a person's reputation. doctor. Apart from that, it is also an effort to relieve patient conflict, making it possible for patients undergoing treatment to receive reasonable compensation. Medical disputes should emphasize settlement through the ADR route because it not only provides benefits for both parties but also obtains legal guarantees from each party in court in Indonesia. Because when compared to dispute resolution outside the court, litigation mediation offers more integrative offers because it does not require high costs, takes a long time, and does not incline any party by upholding a win-win solution. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory and literature study approach and uses descriptive analysis by applying a deductive method. The results of the study show the effectiveness of the implementation of litigation mediation and penal mediation reform in the criminal law system in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":52589,"journal":{"name":"Administrative and Environmental Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of Litigation Mediation in Resolving Medical Negligence Disputes Between Patients and Health Workers\",\"authors\":\"Daffa Ladro Kusworo, Maghfira Nur Khaliza Fauzi\",\"doi\":\"10.25041/aelr.v4i1.2858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Negligence in current medical disputes has not yet obtained legal settlement efforts for both parties, either between the patient, the medical staff, or the hospital. Efforts to resolve medical disputes can be done through two methods: litigation and non-litigation mediation. Determining a dispute resolution model with alternative efforts will minimize doctors' worries as well as stimulate medical personnel to improve the health system and existing errors will become an evaluation of health services later, especially also preventing doctors, patients and other parties from being confronted until a court decision actually damages a person's reputation. doctor. Apart from that, it is also an effort to relieve patient conflict, making it possible for patients undergoing treatment to receive reasonable compensation. Medical disputes should emphasize settlement through the ADR route because it not only provides benefits for both parties but also obtains legal guarantees from each party in court in Indonesia. Because when compared to dispute resolution outside the court, litigation mediation offers more integrative offers because it does not require high costs, takes a long time, and does not incline any party by upholding a win-win solution. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory and literature study approach and uses descriptive analysis by applying a deductive method. The results of the study show the effectiveness of the implementation of litigation mediation and penal mediation reform in the criminal law system in Indonesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administrative and Environmental Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administrative and Environmental Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v4i1.2858\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative and Environmental Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v4i1.2858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前医疗纠纷中的过失,无论是在患者、医务人员还是医院之间,都尚未获得双方的法律解决努力。医疗纠纷的解决可以通过诉讼调解和非诉讼调解两种方式进行。确定一种替代性努力的纠纷解决模式,可以最大限度地减少医生的担忧,也可以激励医务人员改善卫生系统,现有的错误将成为以后对卫生服务的一种评价,特别是可以防止医生、病人和其他各方在法院判决实际损害个人声誉之前发生冲突。医生。除此之外,这也是一种缓解患者矛盾的努力,使正在接受治疗的患者能够得到合理的补偿。医疗纠纷应强调通过ADR途径解决,因为这不仅对双方都有好处,而且在印尼的法庭上也能得到各方的法律保障。因为与庭外纠纷解决相比,诉讼调解费用不高,耗时不长,不偏向任何一方,坚持双赢的解决方案,更具综合性。本研究采用规范性的法律研究方法,结合法规和文献研究方法,运用演绎方法进行描述性分析。研究结果显示了印度尼西亚刑事法律制度中实施诉讼调解和刑事调解改革的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of Litigation Mediation in Resolving Medical Negligence Disputes Between Patients and Health Workers
Negligence in current medical disputes has not yet obtained legal settlement efforts for both parties, either between the patient, the medical staff, or the hospital. Efforts to resolve medical disputes can be done through two methods: litigation and non-litigation mediation. Determining a dispute resolution model with alternative efforts will minimize doctors' worries as well as stimulate medical personnel to improve the health system and existing errors will become an evaluation of health services later, especially also preventing doctors, patients and other parties from being confronted until a court decision actually damages a person's reputation. doctor. Apart from that, it is also an effort to relieve patient conflict, making it possible for patients undergoing treatment to receive reasonable compensation. Medical disputes should emphasize settlement through the ADR route because it not only provides benefits for both parties but also obtains legal guarantees from each party in court in Indonesia. Because when compared to dispute resolution outside the court, litigation mediation offers more integrative offers because it does not require high costs, takes a long time, and does not incline any party by upholding a win-win solution. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory and literature study approach and uses descriptive analysis by applying a deductive method. The results of the study show the effectiveness of the implementation of litigation mediation and penal mediation reform in the criminal law system in Indonesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信