J. Hsu, Xiaoyan Liu, Keren Shen, V. Viswanathan, Yanxiang Zhao
{"title":"通过投资于有需要的ESG而获得卓越业绩","authors":"J. Hsu, Xiaoyan Liu, Keren Shen, V. Viswanathan, Yanxiang Zhao","doi":"10.3905/jii.2018.9.2.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To maximize their effectiveness, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategies should target those ESG firms that are most capital constrained. Inherently, this involves seeking ESG firms that have irrationally high costs of capital and thus high expected return. We replicate results that find returns among ESG firms that are similar to those among non-ESG firms. In addition, we find that sorting stocks based on cost of equity capital generates significant positive return for both ESG and non-ESG firms. Investing in an ESG in Need index, which contains only high-ESG companies and tilts toward firms with high cost of capital, thus generates both higher social value and better return than investing in traditional capitalization-weighted ESG indexes.","PeriodicalId":36431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Index Investing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3905/jii.2018.9.2.018","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outperformance through Investing in ESG in Need\",\"authors\":\"J. Hsu, Xiaoyan Liu, Keren Shen, V. Viswanathan, Yanxiang Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jii.2018.9.2.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To maximize their effectiveness, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategies should target those ESG firms that are most capital constrained. Inherently, this involves seeking ESG firms that have irrationally high costs of capital and thus high expected return. We replicate results that find returns among ESG firms that are similar to those among non-ESG firms. In addition, we find that sorting stocks based on cost of equity capital generates significant positive return for both ESG and non-ESG firms. Investing in an ESG in Need index, which contains only high-ESG companies and tilts toward firms with high cost of capital, thus generates both higher social value and better return than investing in traditional capitalization-weighted ESG indexes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Index Investing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3905/jii.2018.9.2.018\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Index Investing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2018.9.2.018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Index Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2018.9.2.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
摘要
为了最大限度地提高其有效性,环境、社会和治理(ESG)战略应针对资本最受约束的ESG公司。从本质上讲,这涉及到寻找具有非理性高资本成本和高预期回报的ESG公司。我们复制了ESG公司与非ESG公司的回报率相似的结果。此外,我们发现,基于股本成本对股票进行排序,对ESG和非ESG公司都产生了显著的正回报。投资ESG in Need指数,该指数只包含高ESG公司,并倾向于资本成本高的公司,因此比投资传统的资本加权ESG指数产生了更高的社会价值和更好的回报。
To maximize their effectiveness, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategies should target those ESG firms that are most capital constrained. Inherently, this involves seeking ESG firms that have irrationally high costs of capital and thus high expected return. We replicate results that find returns among ESG firms that are similar to those among non-ESG firms. In addition, we find that sorting stocks based on cost of equity capital generates significant positive return for both ESG and non-ESG firms. Investing in an ESG in Need index, which contains only high-ESG companies and tilts toward firms with high cost of capital, thus generates both higher social value and better return than investing in traditional capitalization-weighted ESG indexes.