权威的经验:哈姆雷特与威严的政治美学

IF 0.6 2区文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES

ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1086/715427

E. Guagliardo

{"title":"权威的经验:哈姆雷特与威严的政治美学","authors":"E. Guagliardo","doi":"10.1086/715427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Hamlet the crisis of political authority that famously rots Denmark is registered as an aesthetic crisis—a crisis of perception, feeling, and experience. This essay recovers this broken regime of feeling under the tradition of “majesty,” which in the period described the conventional set of affective and sensible experiences one was supposed to have in the presence of a sovereign prince. Whereas other contemporary plays such as Richard II often dispelled majesty as theatrical illusion, this essay argues that Hamlet takes majesty seriously but redescribes its enchantments to fit a new, post-Reformation decorum of sensibility characterized by dissensus. Here feelings of majesty most indicate sovereignty’s divine authority when, paradoxically, they fail, unable (precisely as exceptional feelings of exceptional authority) to command common agreement. This essay thus counters readings that overemphasize the epistemic nature of Hamlet’s crisis and resituates its aesthetic modernism at the intersection of phenomenology and political theology. [E.G.]","PeriodicalId":44199,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Experience of Authority: Hamlet and the Political Aesthetics of Majesty\",\"authors\":\"E. Guagliardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/715427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Hamlet the crisis of political authority that famously rots Denmark is registered as an aesthetic crisis—a crisis of perception, feeling, and experience. This essay recovers this broken regime of feeling under the tradition of “majesty,” which in the period described the conventional set of affective and sensible experiences one was supposed to have in the presence of a sovereign prince. Whereas other contemporary plays such as Richard II often dispelled majesty as theatrical illusion, this essay argues that Hamlet takes majesty seriously but redescribes its enchantments to fit a new, post-Reformation decorum of sensibility characterized by dissensus. Here feelings of majesty most indicate sovereignty’s divine authority when, paradoxically, they fail, unable (precisely as exceptional feelings of exceptional authority) to command common agreement. This essay thus counters readings that overemphasize the epistemic nature of Hamlet’s crisis and resituates its aesthetic modernism at the intersection of phenomenology and political theology. [E.G.]\",\"PeriodicalId\":44199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/715427\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/715427","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

在《哈姆雷特》中，丹麦著名的政治权威危机被认为是一种审美危机——一种感知、感觉和经验的危机。这篇文章在“威严”传统下恢复了这种破碎的感觉体系，在那个时期，“威严”描述了人们在君主面前应该拥有的传统的情感和理智体验。尽管《理查二世》等其他当代戏剧经常将威严视为戏剧幻觉，但这篇文章认为，《哈姆雷特》严肃对待威严，但重新描述了它的魅力，以适应一种新的、后宗教改革时期的感性礼仪，其特点是持不同意见。在这里，威严的感觉最能表明主权的神圣权威，而矛盾的是，它们失败了，无法(恰恰是作为特殊权威的特殊感觉)命令共同的协议。因此，本文反对过分强调哈姆雷特危机的认识论性质的解读，并在现象学和政治神学的交叉点上保留其审美现代主义。(例如)

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Experience of Authority: Hamlet and the Political Aesthetics of Majesty

In Hamlet the crisis of political authority that famously rots Denmark is registered as an aesthetic crisis—a crisis of perception, feeling, and experience. This essay recovers this broken regime of feeling under the tradition of “majesty,” which in the period described the conventional set of affective and sensible experiences one was supposed to have in the presence of a sovereign prince. Whereas other contemporary plays such as Richard II often dispelled majesty as theatrical illusion, this essay argues that Hamlet takes majesty seriously but redescribes its enchantments to fit a new, post-Reformation decorum of sensibility characterized by dissensus. Here feelings of majesty most indicate sovereignty’s divine authority when, paradoxically, they fail, unable (precisely as exceptional feelings of exceptional authority) to command common agreement. This essay thus counters readings that overemphasize the epistemic nature of Hamlet’s crisis and resituates its aesthetic modernism at the intersection of phenomenology and political theology. [E.G.]

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE Multiple-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： English Literary Renaissance is a journal devoted to current criticism and scholarship of Tudor and early Stuart English literature, 1485-1665, including Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne, and Milton. It is unique in featuring the publication of rare texts and newly discovered manuscripts of the period and current annotated bibliographies of work in the field. It is illustrated with contemporary woodcuts and engravings of Renaissance England and Europe.