Ho‐Hsuan Wei, Aneesh C. Subramanian, K. Karnauskas, Danni Du, M. Balmaseda, Beena B. Sarojini, F. Vitart, C. DeMott, M. Mazloff
{"title":"现场海洋资料同化在ECMWF热带太平洋海温和MLD亚季节预报中的作用","authors":"Ho‐Hsuan Wei, Aneesh C. Subramanian, K. Karnauskas, Danni Du, M. Balmaseda, Beena B. Sarojini, F. Vitart, C. DeMott, M. Mazloff","doi":"10.1002/qj.4570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tropical Pacific plays an important role in modulating the global climate through its prevailing sea surface temperature spatial structure and dominant climate modes like ENSO, MJO, and their teleconnections. These modes of variability, including their oceanic anomalies, are considered to provide sources of prediction skill on subseasonal timescales in the tropics. Therefore, this study aims to examine how assimilating in‐situ ocean observations influences the initial ocean sea surface temperature (SST) and mixed layer depth (MLD) and their subseasonal forecasts. We analyze two subseasonal forecast systems generated with European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecast System (IFS) where the ocean states were initialized using two Observing System Experiment (OSE) reanalyses. We find that the SST differences between forecasts with and without ocean data assimilation grow with time, resulting in a reduced cold tongue bias when assimilating ocean observations. Two mechanisms related to air‐sea coupling are considered to contribute to this growth of SST differences. One is a positive feedback between zonal SST gradient, pressure gradient, and surface wind. The other is the difference in Ekman suction and mixing at the equator due to surface wind speed differences. While the initial mixed layer depth (MLD) can be improved through ocean data assimilation, this improvement is not maintained in the forecasts. Instead, the MLD in both experiments rapidly shoals at the beginning of the forecast. These results emphasize how initialization and model biases influence the air‐sea interaction and the accuracy of subseasonal forecast in the tropical Pacific.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":49646,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of in‐situ ocean data assimilation in ECMWF subseasonal forecasts of SST and MLD over the tropical Pacific Ocean\",\"authors\":\"Ho‐Hsuan Wei, Aneesh C. Subramanian, K. Karnauskas, Danni Du, M. Balmaseda, Beena B. Sarojini, F. Vitart, C. DeMott, M. Mazloff\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/qj.4570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The tropical Pacific plays an important role in modulating the global climate through its prevailing sea surface temperature spatial structure and dominant climate modes like ENSO, MJO, and their teleconnections. These modes of variability, including their oceanic anomalies, are considered to provide sources of prediction skill on subseasonal timescales in the tropics. Therefore, this study aims to examine how assimilating in‐situ ocean observations influences the initial ocean sea surface temperature (SST) and mixed layer depth (MLD) and their subseasonal forecasts. We analyze two subseasonal forecast systems generated with European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecast System (IFS) where the ocean states were initialized using two Observing System Experiment (OSE) reanalyses. We find that the SST differences between forecasts with and without ocean data assimilation grow with time, resulting in a reduced cold tongue bias when assimilating ocean observations. Two mechanisms related to air‐sea coupling are considered to contribute to this growth of SST differences. One is a positive feedback between zonal SST gradient, pressure gradient, and surface wind. The other is the difference in Ekman suction and mixing at the equator due to surface wind speed differences. While the initial mixed layer depth (MLD) can be improved through ocean data assimilation, this improvement is not maintained in the forecasts. Instead, the MLD in both experiments rapidly shoals at the beginning of the forecast. These results emphasize how initialization and model biases influence the air‐sea interaction and the accuracy of subseasonal forecast in the tropical Pacific.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4570\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4570","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of in‐situ ocean data assimilation in ECMWF subseasonal forecasts of SST and MLD over the tropical Pacific Ocean
The tropical Pacific plays an important role in modulating the global climate through its prevailing sea surface temperature spatial structure and dominant climate modes like ENSO, MJO, and their teleconnections. These modes of variability, including their oceanic anomalies, are considered to provide sources of prediction skill on subseasonal timescales in the tropics. Therefore, this study aims to examine how assimilating in‐situ ocean observations influences the initial ocean sea surface temperature (SST) and mixed layer depth (MLD) and their subseasonal forecasts. We analyze two subseasonal forecast systems generated with European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecast System (IFS) where the ocean states were initialized using two Observing System Experiment (OSE) reanalyses. We find that the SST differences between forecasts with and without ocean data assimilation grow with time, resulting in a reduced cold tongue bias when assimilating ocean observations. Two mechanisms related to air‐sea coupling are considered to contribute to this growth of SST differences. One is a positive feedback between zonal SST gradient, pressure gradient, and surface wind. The other is the difference in Ekman suction and mixing at the equator due to surface wind speed differences. While the initial mixed layer depth (MLD) can be improved through ocean data assimilation, this improvement is not maintained in the forecasts. Instead, the MLD in both experiments rapidly shoals at the beginning of the forecast. These results emphasize how initialization and model biases influence the air‐sea interaction and the accuracy of subseasonal forecast in the tropical Pacific.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
期刊介绍:
The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society is a journal published by the Royal Meteorological Society. It aims to communicate and document new research in the atmospheric sciences and related fields. The journal is considered one of the leading publications in meteorology worldwide. It accepts articles, comprehensive review articles, and comments on published papers. It is published eight times a year, with additional special issues.
The Quarterly Journal has a wide readership of scientists in the atmospheric and related fields. It is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Advanced Polymers Abstracts, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, CABDirect, COMPENDEX, CSA Civil Engineering Abstracts, Earthquake Engineering Abstracts, Engineered Materials Abstracts, Science Citation Index, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and more.