排他性交易的需求刺激理论

IF 2.8 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
G. Calzolari, V. Denicoló, Piercarlo Zanchettin
{"title":"排他性交易的需求刺激理论","authors":"G. Calzolari, V. Denicoló, Piercarlo Zanchettin","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper unifies various approaches to the analysis of exclusive dealing that so far have been regarded as distinct. The common element of these approaches is that firms depart from efficient pricing,raising marginal prices above marginal costs. We show that with distorted prices, exclusive dealing can be directly profitable and anti-competitive provided that the dominant firm enjoys a strong competitive advantage over rivals. The dominant firm gains directly, rather than in the future or in adjacent markets, thanks to the boost in demand it enjoys when buyers sign exclusive contracts. We discuss the implication of the theory for antitrust policy.","PeriodicalId":51342,"journal":{"name":"Rand Journal of Economics","volume":"51 1","pages":"713-738"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1756-2171.12338","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The demand‐boost theory of exclusive dealing\",\"authors\":\"G. Calzolari, V. Denicoló, Piercarlo Zanchettin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1756-2171.12338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper unifies various approaches to the analysis of exclusive dealing that so far have been regarded as distinct. The common element of these approaches is that firms depart from efficient pricing,raising marginal prices above marginal costs. We show that with distorted prices, exclusive dealing can be directly profitable and anti-competitive provided that the dominant firm enjoys a strong competitive advantage over rivals. The dominant firm gains directly, rather than in the future or in adjacent markets, thanks to the boost in demand it enjoys when buyers sign exclusive contracts. We discuss the implication of the theory for antitrust policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rand Journal of Economics\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"713-738\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1756-2171.12338\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rand Journal of Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12338\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rand Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

本文统一了迄今为止被认为泾渭分明的分析排他性交易的各种方法。这些方法的共同要素是企业偏离有效定价,将边际价格提高到边际成本之上。我们证明,在扭曲价格的情况下,只要占主导地位的企业对竞争对手享有强大的竞争优势,排他性交易可以直接获利,而且是反竞争的。占主导地位的公司直接获利,而不是在未来或邻近市场获利,这要归功于当买家签订排他性合同时,它所享受的需求增长。我们讨论了该理论对反垄断政策的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The demand‐boost theory of exclusive dealing
This paper unifies various approaches to the analysis of exclusive dealing that so far have been regarded as distinct. The common element of these approaches is that firms depart from efficient pricing,raising marginal prices above marginal costs. We show that with distorted prices, exclusive dealing can be directly profitable and anti-competitive provided that the dominant firm enjoys a strong competitive advantage over rivals. The dominant firm gains directly, rather than in the future or in adjacent markets, thanks to the boost in demand it enjoys when buyers sign exclusive contracts. We discuss the implication of the theory for antitrust policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The RAND Journal of Economics publishes theoretical and empirical research on industrial organization and closely related topics, including contracts, organizations, law and economics, and regulation. The RAND Journal of Economics, formerly the Bell Journal of Economics, is published quarterly by The RAND Corporation, in conjunction with Blackwell Publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信