人类世是一个历史的超客体

IF 0.5 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Daniel Rueda
{"title":"人类世是一个历史的超客体","authors":"Daniel Rueda","doi":"10.1080/13642529.2022.2104967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The notion of the Anthropocene has gained momentum in many academic disciplines in the last couple of decades. Yet it seems that history, both as a human science and a political frame, fails to come to terms with this new geological epoch in which the distinction between humanity and nature blurs. Employing the concept of ‘hyperobject’, this article argues that such collision is not an accident or the result of historiography lagging behind. Rather, it is linked to both epistemological limits (related to time-scale, documentary and field autonomy issues) and political questions (related to human agency and universality). In conclusion, potential alternatives to posthuman anthropocenism are considered as a way to both maintain the foundations of the discipline and build post-anthropocentric approaches.","PeriodicalId":46004,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking History","volume":"26 1","pages":"371 - 391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Anthropocene as a historical hyperobject\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Rueda\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13642529.2022.2104967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The notion of the Anthropocene has gained momentum in many academic disciplines in the last couple of decades. Yet it seems that history, both as a human science and a political frame, fails to come to terms with this new geological epoch in which the distinction between humanity and nature blurs. Employing the concept of ‘hyperobject’, this article argues that such collision is not an accident or the result of historiography lagging behind. Rather, it is linked to both epistemological limits (related to time-scale, documentary and field autonomy issues) and political questions (related to human agency and universality). In conclusion, potential alternatives to posthuman anthropocenism are considered as a way to both maintain the foundations of the discipline and build post-anthropocentric approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking History\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"371 - 391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2022.2104967\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2022.2104967","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在过去的几十年里,人类世的概念在许多学术学科中获得了发展。然而,历史,无论是作为一门人类科学还是作为一个政治框架,似乎都无法接受这个人类与自然之间的区别模糊的新地质时代。本文运用“超对象”的概念,认为这种碰撞不是偶然的,也不是史学滞后的结果。相反,它与认识论限制(与时间尺度、文献和领域自主问题有关)和政治问题(与人类能动性和普遍性有关)有关。总之,后人类主义的潜在替代方案被认为是维护学科基础和建立后人类中心主义方法的一种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Anthropocene as a historical hyperobject
ABSTRACT The notion of the Anthropocene has gained momentum in many academic disciplines in the last couple of decades. Yet it seems that history, both as a human science and a political frame, fails to come to terms with this new geological epoch in which the distinction between humanity and nature blurs. Employing the concept of ‘hyperobject’, this article argues that such collision is not an accident or the result of historiography lagging behind. Rather, it is linked to both epistemological limits (related to time-scale, documentary and field autonomy issues) and political questions (related to human agency and universality). In conclusion, potential alternatives to posthuman anthropocenism are considered as a way to both maintain the foundations of the discipline and build post-anthropocentric approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rethinking History
Rethinking History Multiple-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: This acclaimed journal allows historians in a broad range of specialities to experiment with new ways of presenting and interpreting history. Rethinking History challenges the accepted ways of doing history and rethinks the traditional paradigms, providing a unique forum in which practitioners and theorists can debate and expand the boundaries of the discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信