{"title":"威尔士语中的正形附加和元音缺失","authors":"Michael Hammond, S. Hannahs","doi":"10.16922/jcl.23.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we examine the distribution of epenthesis in final clusters and initial syllable deletion in trisyllabic words in Welsh using a corpus of Twitter data (Jones et al. 2015). We show that the generalisations established in Hannahs 2009, Hannahs 2011, and Hannahs 2013 are\n largely borne out, but there are additional lexical and phonological complications. Specifically, we show that these two processes are subject to lexical frequency effects that go in opposite directions. While this seems at first paradoxical, we go on to show that the frequency\n effects make sense given what we know about phonological processes generally and what we know about Welsh phonotactics specifically. The organization of this paper is as follows. We first review Hannahs's foot-based account of the facts. We then turn to our Twitter data testing Hannahs's\n claims, but also considering additional variables. We show that: i) the phenomena are gradient; and ii) that they are subject to lexical frequency effects. We then argue that these effects are, in fact, to be expected and we justify that claim by looking at further data from another corpus.\n In the first section we review the analysis of final clusters.","PeriodicalId":35107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Celtic Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orthographic epenthesis and vowel deletion in Welsh\",\"authors\":\"Michael Hammond, S. Hannahs\",\"doi\":\"10.16922/jcl.23.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we examine the distribution of epenthesis in final clusters and initial syllable deletion in trisyllabic words in Welsh using a corpus of Twitter data (Jones et al. 2015). We show that the generalisations established in Hannahs 2009, Hannahs 2011, and Hannahs 2013 are\\n largely borne out, but there are additional lexical and phonological complications. Specifically, we show that these two processes are subject to lexical frequency effects that go in opposite directions. While this seems at first paradoxical, we go on to show that the frequency\\n effects make sense given what we know about phonological processes generally and what we know about Welsh phonotactics specifically. The organization of this paper is as follows. We first review Hannahs's foot-based account of the facts. We then turn to our Twitter data testing Hannahs's\\n claims, but also considering additional variables. We show that: i) the phenomena are gradient; and ii) that they are subject to lexical frequency effects. We then argue that these effects are, in fact, to be expected and we justify that claim by looking at further data from another corpus.\\n In the first section we review the analysis of final clusters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Celtic Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Celtic Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16922/jcl.23.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Celtic Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16922/jcl.23.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在本文中,我们使用推特数据语料库(Jones et al.2015)研究了威尔士语三音节单词中词尾簇中的附加词和首音节删除的分布。我们发现,汉纳2009年、汉纳2011年和汉纳2013年建立的概括在很大程度上得到了证实,但也存在额外的词汇和语音复杂性。具体地说,我们发现这两个过程都受到词汇频率效应的影响,而词汇频率效应是朝着相反的方向发展的。虽然这一点一开始看起来很矛盾,但我们继续证明,鉴于我们对语音过程的普遍了解,以及对威尔士表音策略的具体了解,频率效应是有意义的。本文的组织结构如下。我们首先回顾汉纳对事实的立足点描述。然后,我们转向我们的推特数据,测试Hannahs的说法,但也考虑了其他变量。我们证明:(1)现象是梯度的;以及ii)它们受到词汇频率效应的影响。然后,我们认为这些影响实际上是意料之中的,我们通过查看另一个语料库的进一步数据来证明这一说法是合理的。在第一节中,我们回顾了对最终集群的分析。
Orthographic epenthesis and vowel deletion in Welsh
In this paper, we examine the distribution of epenthesis in final clusters and initial syllable deletion in trisyllabic words in Welsh using a corpus of Twitter data (Jones et al. 2015). We show that the generalisations established in Hannahs 2009, Hannahs 2011, and Hannahs 2013 are
largely borne out, but there are additional lexical and phonological complications. Specifically, we show that these two processes are subject to lexical frequency effects that go in opposite directions. While this seems at first paradoxical, we go on to show that the frequency
effects make sense given what we know about phonological processes generally and what we know about Welsh phonotactics specifically. The organization of this paper is as follows. We first review Hannahs's foot-based account of the facts. We then turn to our Twitter data testing Hannahs's
claims, but also considering additional variables. We show that: i) the phenomena are gradient; and ii) that they are subject to lexical frequency effects. We then argue that these effects are, in fact, to be expected and we justify that claim by looking at further data from another corpus.
In the first section we review the analysis of final clusters.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Celtic Linguistics publishes articles and reviews on all aspects of the linguistics of the Celtic languages, modern, medieval and ancient, with particular emphasis on synchronic studies, while not excluding diachronic and comparative-historical work. Papers are invited in English on all fields/‘levels’ of analysis; phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics; formal or functional, cross-language typological or language-internal, dialectological or sociolinguistic, any theoretical paradigm.