利用差分进化设计和分析不同太阳-地球框架下的准晕轨道和地球最佳转移

IF 1.1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Rithwik Neelakantan, R. V. Ramanan
{"title":"利用差分进化设计和分析不同太阳-地球框架下的准晕轨道和地球最佳转移","authors":"Rithwik Neelakantan,&nbsp;R. V. Ramanan","doi":"10.1007/s12036-023-09969-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In general, the initial designs of periodic orbits around the Lagrangian points and transfers to them from the Earth are generated under the Circular Restricted Three Body Problem (CRTBP) framework and used as reference designs to generate realistic designs under Ephemeris models. The realistic ephemeris designs are quasi-periodic multi-revolution orbits. So, the use of periodic orbits, which are multi-revolution in nature can be explored as reference designs as an alternative. Although, the periodic orbits generated in the Elliptical Restricted Three Body Problem (ERTBP) framework are multi-revolution in nature, in the Sun–Earth system, these orbits have large in-plane and out-of-plane amplitudes and hence, these are not suitable for scientific missions. For viable smaller amplitudes, only quasi-halo orbits do exist around the Sun–Earth Lagrangian point L<sub>1</sub> in the ERTBP framework. Hence, as an alternative to the periodic orbits under the CRTBP framework, the quasi-halo orbits under the ERTBP framework are designed and used as reference designs to generate ephemeris designs. These quasi-halo orbits are generated using a methodology, proposed in this paper, which involves differential evolution, an evolutionary optimization technique. Using a similar approach based on the differential evolution technique, the quasi-halo orbits are designed in the Ephemeris model also. The methodology could generate quasi-halo orbits that do not require any theoretical velocity corrections for about five years (10 revolutions). The pros and cons of reference designs in generating ephemeris design are analyzed. It is found that the design in the Ephemeris model is close to both the initial designs in CRTBP and ERTBP frameworks. However, the use of ERTBP design as the reference design does not result in a reduction in computational time. Furthermore, optimal two-impulse transfers to the quasi-halo orbit from an Earth parking orbit, are generated under the ERTBP framework and the Ephemeris model. The location of insertion and the components of orbit insertion velocity are treated as unknowns and determined using differential evolution. The transfer cost in the Ephemeris model is found to be less compared to transfers in CRTBP and ERTBP frameworks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy","volume":"44 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and analysis of quasi-halo orbits and optimal transfers from the Earth under different Sun–Earth frameworks using differential evolution\",\"authors\":\"Rithwik Neelakantan,&nbsp;R. V. Ramanan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12036-023-09969-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In general, the initial designs of periodic orbits around the Lagrangian points and transfers to them from the Earth are generated under the Circular Restricted Three Body Problem (CRTBP) framework and used as reference designs to generate realistic designs under Ephemeris models. The realistic ephemeris designs are quasi-periodic multi-revolution orbits. So, the use of periodic orbits, which are multi-revolution in nature can be explored as reference designs as an alternative. Although, the periodic orbits generated in the Elliptical Restricted Three Body Problem (ERTBP) framework are multi-revolution in nature, in the Sun–Earth system, these orbits have large in-plane and out-of-plane amplitudes and hence, these are not suitable for scientific missions. For viable smaller amplitudes, only quasi-halo orbits do exist around the Sun–Earth Lagrangian point L<sub>1</sub> in the ERTBP framework. Hence, as an alternative to the periodic orbits under the CRTBP framework, the quasi-halo orbits under the ERTBP framework are designed and used as reference designs to generate ephemeris designs. These quasi-halo orbits are generated using a methodology, proposed in this paper, which involves differential evolution, an evolutionary optimization technique. Using a similar approach based on the differential evolution technique, the quasi-halo orbits are designed in the Ephemeris model also. The methodology could generate quasi-halo orbits that do not require any theoretical velocity corrections for about five years (10 revolutions). The pros and cons of reference designs in generating ephemeris design are analyzed. It is found that the design in the Ephemeris model is close to both the initial designs in CRTBP and ERTBP frameworks. However, the use of ERTBP design as the reference design does not result in a reduction in computational time. Furthermore, optimal two-impulse transfers to the quasi-halo orbit from an Earth parking orbit, are generated under the ERTBP framework and the Ephemeris model. The location of insertion and the components of orbit insertion velocity are treated as unknowns and determined using differential evolution. The transfer cost in the Ephemeris model is found to be less compared to transfers in CRTBP and ERTBP frameworks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12036-023-09969-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12036-023-09969-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一般来说,围绕拉格朗日点的周期轨道的初始设计和从地球到拉格朗日点的转移是在圆形受限三体问题(CRTBP)框架下生成的,并作为参考设计在星历模型下生成现实的设计。现实的星历设计是准周期的多公转轨道。所以,周期轨道的使用,本质上是多次旋转的,可以作为一种替代的参考设计来探索。虽然在椭圆受限三体问题(ERTBP)框架下生成的周期轨道本质上是多公转的,但在日地系统中,这些轨道具有较大的面内和面外振幅,因此不适合用于科学任务。对于可行的较小振幅,在ERTBP框架中,太阳-地球拉格朗日点L1周围只存在准晕轨道。因此,作为CRTBP框架下周期轨道的替代方案,设计了ERTBP框架下的准晕轨道,并将其作为生成星历表的参考设计。这些准晕轨道是用本文提出的一种方法生成的,该方法涉及差分进化,一种进化优化技术。采用基于差分演化技术的类似方法,在星历模型中也设计了准晕轨道。这种方法可以产生准光晕轨道,在大约5年(10圈)的时间里不需要任何理论速度修正。分析了星历表生成设计中参考设计的优缺点。结果表明,星历模型中的设计与CRTBP和ERTBP框架中的初始设计接近。然而,使用ERTBP设计作为参考设计并不会减少计算时间。在ERTBP框架和星历模型下,得到了从地球静止轨道到准晕轨道的最优双脉冲传递。将插入位置和插入轨道速度分量作为未知数,采用差分演化法确定插入位置和插入轨道速度分量。与CRTBP和ERTBP框架相比,Ephemeris模型的传输成本更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Design and analysis of quasi-halo orbits and optimal transfers from the Earth under different Sun–Earth frameworks using differential evolution

Design and analysis of quasi-halo orbits and optimal transfers from the Earth under different Sun–Earth frameworks using differential evolution

In general, the initial designs of periodic orbits around the Lagrangian points and transfers to them from the Earth are generated under the Circular Restricted Three Body Problem (CRTBP) framework and used as reference designs to generate realistic designs under Ephemeris models. The realistic ephemeris designs are quasi-periodic multi-revolution orbits. So, the use of periodic orbits, which are multi-revolution in nature can be explored as reference designs as an alternative. Although, the periodic orbits generated in the Elliptical Restricted Three Body Problem (ERTBP) framework are multi-revolution in nature, in the Sun–Earth system, these orbits have large in-plane and out-of-plane amplitudes and hence, these are not suitable for scientific missions. For viable smaller amplitudes, only quasi-halo orbits do exist around the Sun–Earth Lagrangian point L1 in the ERTBP framework. Hence, as an alternative to the periodic orbits under the CRTBP framework, the quasi-halo orbits under the ERTBP framework are designed and used as reference designs to generate ephemeris designs. These quasi-halo orbits are generated using a methodology, proposed in this paper, which involves differential evolution, an evolutionary optimization technique. Using a similar approach based on the differential evolution technique, the quasi-halo orbits are designed in the Ephemeris model also. The methodology could generate quasi-halo orbits that do not require any theoretical velocity corrections for about five years (10 revolutions). The pros and cons of reference designs in generating ephemeris design are analyzed. It is found that the design in the Ephemeris model is close to both the initial designs in CRTBP and ERTBP frameworks. However, the use of ERTBP design as the reference design does not result in a reduction in computational time. Furthermore, optimal two-impulse transfers to the quasi-halo orbit from an Earth parking orbit, are generated under the ERTBP framework and the Ephemeris model. The location of insertion and the components of orbit insertion velocity are treated as unknowns and determined using differential evolution. The transfer cost in the Ephemeris model is found to be less compared to transfers in CRTBP and ERTBP frameworks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy
Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research papers on all aspects of astrophysics and astronomy, including instrumentation, laboratory astrophysics, and cosmology. Critical reviews of topical fields are also published. Articles submitted as letters will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信