实时流量预测:人工智能与水文洞察

IF 3.1 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Witold F. Krajewski , Ganesh R. Ghimire , Ibrahim Demir , Ricardo Mantilla
{"title":"实时流量预测:人工智能与水文洞察","authors":"Witold F. Krajewski ,&nbsp;Ganesh R. Ghimire ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Demir ,&nbsp;Ricardo Mantilla","doi":"10.1016/j.hydroa.2021.100110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we propose a set of simple benchmarks for the evaluation of data-based models for real-time streamflow forecasting, such as those developed with sophisticated Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms. The benchmarks are also data-based and provide context to judge incremental improvements in the performance metrics from the more complicated approaches. The benchmarks include temporal and spatial persistence, persistence corrected for baseflow and streamflow, as well as river distance weighted runoff obtained from space-time distributed rainfall. In the development of the benchmarks, we use basic hydrologic insights such as flow aggregation by the river network, scale-dependence in basin response, streamflow partitioning into quick flow and baseflow, water travel time, and rainfall averaging by the basin width function. The study uses 140 streamflow gauges in Iowa that cover a range of basin scales between 7 and 37,000 km<sup>2</sup>. The data cover 17 years. This work demonstrates that the proposed benchmarks can provide good performance according to several commonly used metrics. For example, streamflow forecasting at half of the test locations across years achieves a Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) score of 0.6 or higher at one-day ahead lead time, and 20% of cases reach the KGE of 0.8 or higher. The proposed benchmarks are easy to implement and should prove useful for developers of data-based as well as physics-based hydrologic models and real-time data assimilation techniques.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology X","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915521000389/pdfft?md5=51c92e2199a5b69c5dd3fcfb0be2ebc6&pid=1-s2.0-S2589915521000389-main.pdf","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-time streamflow forecasting: AI vs. Hydrologic insights\",\"authors\":\"Witold F. Krajewski ,&nbsp;Ganesh R. Ghimire ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Demir ,&nbsp;Ricardo Mantilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hydroa.2021.100110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper, we propose a set of simple benchmarks for the evaluation of data-based models for real-time streamflow forecasting, such as those developed with sophisticated Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms. The benchmarks are also data-based and provide context to judge incremental improvements in the performance metrics from the more complicated approaches. The benchmarks include temporal and spatial persistence, persistence corrected for baseflow and streamflow, as well as river distance weighted runoff obtained from space-time distributed rainfall. In the development of the benchmarks, we use basic hydrologic insights such as flow aggregation by the river network, scale-dependence in basin response, streamflow partitioning into quick flow and baseflow, water travel time, and rainfall averaging by the basin width function. The study uses 140 streamflow gauges in Iowa that cover a range of basin scales between 7 and 37,000 km<sup>2</sup>. The data cover 17 years. This work demonstrates that the proposed benchmarks can provide good performance according to several commonly used metrics. For example, streamflow forecasting at half of the test locations across years achieves a Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) score of 0.6 or higher at one-day ahead lead time, and 20% of cases reach the KGE of 0.8 or higher. The proposed benchmarks are easy to implement and should prove useful for developers of data-based as well as physics-based hydrologic models and real-time data assimilation techniques.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology X\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915521000389/pdfft?md5=51c92e2199a5b69c5dd3fcfb0be2ebc6&pid=1-s2.0-S2589915521000389-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915521000389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915521000389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了一套简单的基准,用于评估实时流量预测的基于数据的模型,例如使用复杂的人工智能(AI)算法开发的模型。基准测试也是基于数据的,并提供上下文来判断来自更复杂方法的性能指标的增量改进。基准包括时间和空间持久性、基流和径流校正持久性以及从时空分布降雨中获得的河流距离加权径流。在基准的开发过程中,我们使用了基本的水文学见解,如河流网络的流量聚集,流域响应的尺度依赖性,水流划分为快流和基流,水的旅行时间,以及流域宽度函数的降雨量平均。这项研究在爱荷华州使用了140个流量测量仪,覆盖了7到37,000平方公里的流域尺度。数据涵盖了17年。这项工作表明,根据几个常用的度量标准,建议的基准可以提供良好的性能。例如,在一半的测试地点,跨年的流量预测在提前一天的时间内实现了0.6或更高的克林-古普塔效率(KGE)得分,20%的案例达到了0.8或更高的KGE。提议的基准很容易实施,并且应该证明对基于数据和基于物理的水文模型和实时数据同化技术的开发人员有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-time streamflow forecasting: AI vs. Hydrologic insights

In this paper, we propose a set of simple benchmarks for the evaluation of data-based models for real-time streamflow forecasting, such as those developed with sophisticated Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms. The benchmarks are also data-based and provide context to judge incremental improvements in the performance metrics from the more complicated approaches. The benchmarks include temporal and spatial persistence, persistence corrected for baseflow and streamflow, as well as river distance weighted runoff obtained from space-time distributed rainfall. In the development of the benchmarks, we use basic hydrologic insights such as flow aggregation by the river network, scale-dependence in basin response, streamflow partitioning into quick flow and baseflow, water travel time, and rainfall averaging by the basin width function. The study uses 140 streamflow gauges in Iowa that cover a range of basin scales between 7 and 37,000 km2. The data cover 17 years. This work demonstrates that the proposed benchmarks can provide good performance according to several commonly used metrics. For example, streamflow forecasting at half of the test locations across years achieves a Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) score of 0.6 or higher at one-day ahead lead time, and 20% of cases reach the KGE of 0.8 or higher. The proposed benchmarks are easy to implement and should prove useful for developers of data-based as well as physics-based hydrologic models and real-time data assimilation techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology X
Journal of Hydrology X Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
20
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信