{"title":"城市化是否能改善健康结果:一项跨国家层面的分析","authors":"Sabyasachi Tripathi, Moinak Maiti","doi":"10.1007/s41685-022-00268-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Though rapid escalating urbanization has a positive effect on economic growth and employment, its impacts on health outcomes need to be analyzed. Using panel quantile regression models: the present study examined the impact of urbanization on health outcomes by considering 204 countries from 1960 to 2021. We measured urbanization by considering three proxy variables; total urban population, percentage of the urban population, and percentage of the population living in million-plus agglomerations. Overall estimated results suggested a negative effect on the fertility rate and a positive impact on life expectancy at birth due to urbanization. A mixed impact of urbanization was perceived on the infant mortality rate. Urbanization quality and management variables such as percentage of the urban population having access to clean fuel and technologies for cooking, electricity, basic drinking water, sanitation services, and hand washing facilities showed an asymmetric impact on health outcomes. The study additionally deployed feasible generalized least square (FGLS) and bias corrected least square dummy variable (LSDV) regressions to confirm the robustness of outcomes. The Granger causality test indicated that the relationship between urbanization and health outcomes is bidirectional. The panel cointegration test suggested that there is a long-run relationship between them. Order logit regression results suggested that the impact of urbanization on health outcomes may vary with the different stages of development a country is experiencing. The results indicate that well managed urbanization is beneficial for achieving higher health outcomes. Most importantly, developing countries are yet to promote and manage urbanization from this perspective, thus urgent attention is needed. Finally, we suggest appropriate policies for sustainable urbanization to achieve higher health outcomes in the world.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36164,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science","volume":"7 1","pages":"277 - 316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does urbanization improve health outcomes: a cross country level analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sabyasachi Tripathi, Moinak Maiti\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41685-022-00268-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Though rapid escalating urbanization has a positive effect on economic growth and employment, its impacts on health outcomes need to be analyzed. Using panel quantile regression models: the present study examined the impact of urbanization on health outcomes by considering 204 countries from 1960 to 2021. We measured urbanization by considering three proxy variables; total urban population, percentage of the urban population, and percentage of the population living in million-plus agglomerations. Overall estimated results suggested a negative effect on the fertility rate and a positive impact on life expectancy at birth due to urbanization. A mixed impact of urbanization was perceived on the infant mortality rate. Urbanization quality and management variables such as percentage of the urban population having access to clean fuel and technologies for cooking, electricity, basic drinking water, sanitation services, and hand washing facilities showed an asymmetric impact on health outcomes. The study additionally deployed feasible generalized least square (FGLS) and bias corrected least square dummy variable (LSDV) regressions to confirm the robustness of outcomes. The Granger causality test indicated that the relationship between urbanization and health outcomes is bidirectional. The panel cointegration test suggested that there is a long-run relationship between them. Order logit regression results suggested that the impact of urbanization on health outcomes may vary with the different stages of development a country is experiencing. The results indicate that well managed urbanization is beneficial for achieving higher health outcomes. Most importantly, developing countries are yet to promote and manage urbanization from this perspective, thus urgent attention is needed. Finally, we suggest appropriate policies for sustainable urbanization to achieve higher health outcomes in the world.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"277 - 316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41685-022-00268-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41685-022-00268-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does urbanization improve health outcomes: a cross country level analysis
Though rapid escalating urbanization has a positive effect on economic growth and employment, its impacts on health outcomes need to be analyzed. Using panel quantile regression models: the present study examined the impact of urbanization on health outcomes by considering 204 countries from 1960 to 2021. We measured urbanization by considering three proxy variables; total urban population, percentage of the urban population, and percentage of the population living in million-plus agglomerations. Overall estimated results suggested a negative effect on the fertility rate and a positive impact on life expectancy at birth due to urbanization. A mixed impact of urbanization was perceived on the infant mortality rate. Urbanization quality and management variables such as percentage of the urban population having access to clean fuel and technologies for cooking, electricity, basic drinking water, sanitation services, and hand washing facilities showed an asymmetric impact on health outcomes. The study additionally deployed feasible generalized least square (FGLS) and bias corrected least square dummy variable (LSDV) regressions to confirm the robustness of outcomes. The Granger causality test indicated that the relationship between urbanization and health outcomes is bidirectional. The panel cointegration test suggested that there is a long-run relationship between them. Order logit regression results suggested that the impact of urbanization on health outcomes may vary with the different stages of development a country is experiencing. The results indicate that well managed urbanization is beneficial for achieving higher health outcomes. Most importantly, developing countries are yet to promote and manage urbanization from this perspective, thus urgent attention is needed. Finally, we suggest appropriate policies for sustainable urbanization to achieve higher health outcomes in the world.
期刊介绍:
The Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science expands the frontiers of regional science through the diffusion of intrinsically developed and advanced modern, regional science methodologies throughout the Asia-Pacific region. Articles published in the journal foster progress and development of regional science through the promotion of comprehensive and interdisciplinary academic studies in relationship to research in regional science across the globe. The journal’s scope includes articles dedicated to theoretical economics, positive economics including econometrics and statistical analysis and input–output analysis, CGE, Simulation, applied economics including international economics, regional economics, industrial organization, analysis of governance and institutional issues, law and economics, migration and labor markets, spatial economics, land economics, urban economics, agricultural economics, environmental economics, behavioral economics and spatial analysis with GIS/RS data education economics, sociology including urban sociology, rural sociology, environmental sociology and educational sociology, as well as traffic engineering. The journal provides a unique platform for its research community to further develop, analyze, and resolve urgent regional and urban issues in Asia, and to further refine established research around the world in this multidisciplinary field. The journal invites original articles, proposals, and book reviews.The Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science is a new English-language journal that spun out of Chiikigakukenkyuu, which has a 45-year history of publishing the best Japanese research in regional science in the Japanese language and, more recently and more frequently, in English. The development of regional science as an international discipline has necessitated the need for a new publication in English. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science is a publishing vehicle for English-language contributions to the field in Japan, across the complete Asia-Pacific arena, and beyond.Content published in this journal is peer reviewed (Double Blind).