葛兰西论官僚制

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
F. Antonini
{"title":"葛兰西论官僚制","authors":"F. Antonini","doi":"10.1080/01614622.2022.2060490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay reconstructs Antonio Gramsci’s account of bureaucracy as it unfolds in his magnum opus, the Prison Notebooks. By adopting the “philological” way of reading this work developed in recent decades by Gramsci scholars and significantly anticipated by Joseph Buttigieg’s “Gramsci’s Method” (1990), I show how the concept of bureaucracy is closely connected to some key elements in Gramsci’s political reflections, such as the categories of “hegemony” and “organic crisis.” While drawing out the “constellation” of Gramsci’s references to bureaucratic apparatuses throughout his carceral writings, I stress in particular their relationship with his investigation of the nature and the role of political parties, as well as with his overall assessment of parliamentarism (and of its degeneration). In this framework, a further pivotal element is represented by Gramsci’s conception of “modernity,” that is, of the features that characterize the contemporary political panorama and to which the issue of bureaucracy is closely related. To conclude, I compare Gramsci’s and Max Weber’s theories of bureaucracy, showing both similarities and differences.","PeriodicalId":41506,"journal":{"name":"Italian Culture","volume":"40 1","pages":"16 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gramsci on Bureaucracy\",\"authors\":\"F. Antonini\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01614622.2022.2060490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay reconstructs Antonio Gramsci’s account of bureaucracy as it unfolds in his magnum opus, the Prison Notebooks. By adopting the “philological” way of reading this work developed in recent decades by Gramsci scholars and significantly anticipated by Joseph Buttigieg’s “Gramsci’s Method” (1990), I show how the concept of bureaucracy is closely connected to some key elements in Gramsci’s political reflections, such as the categories of “hegemony” and “organic crisis.” While drawing out the “constellation” of Gramsci’s references to bureaucratic apparatuses throughout his carceral writings, I stress in particular their relationship with his investigation of the nature and the role of political parties, as well as with his overall assessment of parliamentarism (and of its degeneration). In this framework, a further pivotal element is represented by Gramsci’s conception of “modernity,” that is, of the features that characterize the contemporary political panorama and to which the issue of bureaucracy is closely related. To conclude, I compare Gramsci’s and Max Weber’s theories of bureaucracy, showing both similarities and differences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italian Culture\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"16 - 26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italian Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01614622.2022.2060490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01614622.2022.2060490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文重构了葛兰西在其代表作《监狱笔记》中对官僚主义的描述。通过采用葛兰西学者近几十年来发展起来的、约瑟夫·布蒂吉格(Joseph Buttigieg)的《葛兰西方法》(Gramsci’s Method)(1990)所期待的“语文学”阅读方式,我展示了官僚主义的概念是如何与葛兰西政治反思中的一些关键因素密切相关的,例如“霸权”和“有机危机”的类别。“在葛兰西的尸体著作中,我列举了他对官僚机构的“一系列”提及,同时我特别强调了这些提及与他对政党性质和作用的调查,以及他对议会制度(及其退化)的总体评估之间的关系。在这个框架中,葛兰西的“现代性”概念代表了另一个关键因素,即当代政治全景的特征,官僚主义问题与之密切相关。最后,我比较了葛兰西和马克斯·韦伯的官僚主义理论,既有相似之处,也有不同之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gramsci on Bureaucracy
This essay reconstructs Antonio Gramsci’s account of bureaucracy as it unfolds in his magnum opus, the Prison Notebooks. By adopting the “philological” way of reading this work developed in recent decades by Gramsci scholars and significantly anticipated by Joseph Buttigieg’s “Gramsci’s Method” (1990), I show how the concept of bureaucracy is closely connected to some key elements in Gramsci’s political reflections, such as the categories of “hegemony” and “organic crisis.” While drawing out the “constellation” of Gramsci’s references to bureaucratic apparatuses throughout his carceral writings, I stress in particular their relationship with his investigation of the nature and the role of political parties, as well as with his overall assessment of parliamentarism (and of its degeneration). In this framework, a further pivotal element is represented by Gramsci’s conception of “modernity,” that is, of the features that characterize the contemporary political panorama and to which the issue of bureaucracy is closely related. To conclude, I compare Gramsci’s and Max Weber’s theories of bureaucracy, showing both similarities and differences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Italian Culture
Italian Culture HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信