西班牙STEMI护理的地区差异。来自ACI-SEC梗塞代码注册表的数据

Q2 Medicine
O. Rodriguez-Leor, A. B. Cid-Álvarez, Raúl Moreno, X. Rosselló, S. Ojeda, A. Serrador, R. López-Palop, J. Martín‐Moreiras, J. Ramón Rumoroso, Á. Cequier, Borja Ibanez, I. Cruz-González, R. Romaguera, Sergio Raposeiras and, Armando Pérez de Prado
{"title":"西班牙STEMI护理的地区差异。来自ACI-SEC梗塞代码注册表的数据","authors":"O. Rodriguez-Leor, A. B. Cid-Álvarez, Raúl Moreno, X. Rosselló, S. Ojeda, A. Serrador, R. López-Palop, J. Martín‐Moreiras, J. Ramón Rumoroso, Á. Cequier, Borja Ibanez, I. Cruz-González, R. Romaguera, Sergio Raposeiras and, Armando Pérez de Prado","doi":"10.24875/recice.m22000360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". ABSTRACT Introduction and objectives: Geographical and organizational differences between different autonomous communities (AC) can generate differences in care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A total of 17 heart attack code programs have been compared in terms of incidence rate, clinical characteristics, reperfusion therapy, delay to reperfusion, and 30-day mortality. Methods: National prospective observational study (83 centers included in 17 infarction networks). The recruitment period was 3 months (April 1 to June 30, 2019) with clinical follow-up at 30 days. Results: 4366 patients with STEMI were included. The incidence rate was variable between different AC ( P < .0001), as was gender ( P = .003) and the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors ( P < .0001). Reperfusion treatment was primary angioplasty (range 77.5%-97.8%), fibrinolysis (range 0%-12.9%) or no treatment (range 2.2%- 13.5%). The analysis of the delay to reperfusion showed significant differences ( P < .001) for all the intervals analyzed. There were significant differences in 30-days mortality that disappeared after adjusting for clinical and healthcare network characteristics. Conclusions: Large differences in STEMI care have been detected between the different AC, in terms of incidence rate, clinical characteristics, reperfusion treatment, delay until reperfusion, and 30-day mortality. The differences in mortality disappeared after adjusting for the characteristics of the patient and the care network.","PeriodicalId":34613,"journal":{"name":"REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional differences in STEMI care in Spain. Data from the ACI-SEC Infarction Code Registry\",\"authors\":\"O. Rodriguez-Leor, A. B. Cid-Álvarez, Raúl Moreno, X. Rosselló, S. Ojeda, A. Serrador, R. López-Palop, J. Martín‐Moreiras, J. Ramón Rumoroso, Á. Cequier, Borja Ibanez, I. Cruz-González, R. Romaguera, Sergio Raposeiras and, Armando Pérez de Prado\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/recice.m22000360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". ABSTRACT Introduction and objectives: Geographical and organizational differences between different autonomous communities (AC) can generate differences in care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A total of 17 heart attack code programs have been compared in terms of incidence rate, clinical characteristics, reperfusion therapy, delay to reperfusion, and 30-day mortality. Methods: National prospective observational study (83 centers included in 17 infarction networks). The recruitment period was 3 months (April 1 to June 30, 2019) with clinical follow-up at 30 days. Results: 4366 patients with STEMI were included. The incidence rate was variable between different AC ( P < .0001), as was gender ( P = .003) and the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors ( P < .0001). Reperfusion treatment was primary angioplasty (range 77.5%-97.8%), fibrinolysis (range 0%-12.9%) or no treatment (range 2.2%- 13.5%). The analysis of the delay to reperfusion showed significant differences ( P < .001) for all the intervals analyzed. There were significant differences in 30-days mortality that disappeared after adjusting for clinical and healthcare network characteristics. Conclusions: Large differences in STEMI care have been detected between the different AC, in terms of incidence rate, clinical characteristics, reperfusion treatment, delay until reperfusion, and 30-day mortality. The differences in mortality disappeared after adjusting for the characteristics of the patient and the care network.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/recice.m22000360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/recice.m22000360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

. 简介和目的:不同自治社区(AC)之间的地理和组织差异会导致st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的护理差异。在发病率、临床特征、再灌注治疗、再灌注延迟和30天死亡率方面,对17种心脏病发作编码方案进行了比较。方法:国家前瞻性观察研究(包括17个梗死网络的83个中心)。招募期为3个月(2019年4月1日至6月30日),临床随访30天。结果:纳入STEMI患者4366例。不同AC之间的发病率存在差异(P < 0.0001),性别(P = 0.003)和心血管危险因素的患病率(P < 0.0001)也存在差异。再灌注治疗包括初级血管成形术(77.5%-97.8%)、纤溶(0%-12.9%)或不治疗(2.2%- 13.5%)。再灌注延迟分析显示,各分析时间间隔差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。在调整临床和医疗网络特征后,30天死亡率存在显著差异。结论:不同AC在STEMI护理方面的发生率、临床特征、再灌注治疗、延迟再灌注和30天死亡率方面存在较大差异。在调整了患者的特点和护理网络后,死亡率的差异消失了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regional differences in STEMI care in Spain. Data from the ACI-SEC Infarction Code Registry
. ABSTRACT Introduction and objectives: Geographical and organizational differences between different autonomous communities (AC) can generate differences in care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A total of 17 heart attack code programs have been compared in terms of incidence rate, clinical characteristics, reperfusion therapy, delay to reperfusion, and 30-day mortality. Methods: National prospective observational study (83 centers included in 17 infarction networks). The recruitment period was 3 months (April 1 to June 30, 2019) with clinical follow-up at 30 days. Results: 4366 patients with STEMI were included. The incidence rate was variable between different AC ( P < .0001), as was gender ( P = .003) and the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors ( P < .0001). Reperfusion treatment was primary angioplasty (range 77.5%-97.8%), fibrinolysis (range 0%-12.9%) or no treatment (range 2.2%- 13.5%). The analysis of the delay to reperfusion showed significant differences ( P < .001) for all the intervals analyzed. There were significant differences in 30-days mortality that disappeared after adjusting for clinical and healthcare network characteristics. Conclusions: Large differences in STEMI care have been detected between the different AC, in terms of incidence rate, clinical characteristics, reperfusion treatment, delay until reperfusion, and 30-day mortality. The differences in mortality disappeared after adjusting for the characteristics of the patient and the care network.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed
REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信