Jorik H. Amesz , Sanne J.J. Langmuur , Mark F.A. Bierhuizen , Natasja M.S. de Groot , Olivier C. Manintveld , Yannick J.H.J. Taverne
{"title":"精密切割活体心力衰竭切片:双刃剑的故事","authors":"Jorik H. Amesz , Sanne J.J. Langmuur , Mark F.A. Bierhuizen , Natasja M.S. de Groot , Olivier C. Manintveld , Yannick J.H.J. Taverne","doi":"10.1016/j.jmccpl.2023.100040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Heart failure (HF) is a rapidly growing pandemic while medical treatment options remain limited. Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is a novel HF drug that directly targets the myosin heads of the cardiac muscle. This study used living myocardial slices (LMS) from patients with HF to evaluate the direct biomechanical effects of OM as compared to dobutamine. LMS were produced from patients with end-stage HF undergoing cardiac transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation and cultured under electromechanical stimulation (diastolic preload: ca. 1 mN, stimulation frequency: 0.5 Hz). Dobutamine and omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) were administered on consecutive days and biomechanical effects were continuously recorded with dedicated force transducers. OM and dobutamine significantly increased contractile force to a similar maximum force, but OM also increased median time-to-peak with 48 % (<em>p</em> = 0.046) and time-to-relaxation with 68 % (<em>p</em> = 0.045). OM administration led to impaired relaxation of HF LMS with increasing stimulation frequencies, which was not observed with dobutamine. Furthermore, the functional refractory period was significantly shorter after administration of OM compared to dobutamine (235 ms (200–265) vs. 270 ms (259–283), <em>p</em> = 0.035). In conclusion, OM increased contractile force and systolic duration of HF LMS, indicating an improvement in cardiac function and normalization of systolic time intervals in patients with HF. Conversely, OM slowed relaxation, which could lead to diastolic filling abnormalities. As such, OM showed benefits on systolic function on one hand but potential hindrances of diastolic function on the other hand.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73835,"journal":{"name":"Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100040"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Omecamtiv mecarbil in precision-cut living heart failure slices: A story of a double-edged sword\",\"authors\":\"Jorik H. Amesz , Sanne J.J. Langmuur , Mark F.A. Bierhuizen , Natasja M.S. de Groot , Olivier C. Manintveld , Yannick J.H.J. Taverne\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmccpl.2023.100040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Heart failure (HF) is a rapidly growing pandemic while medical treatment options remain limited. Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is a novel HF drug that directly targets the myosin heads of the cardiac muscle. This study used living myocardial slices (LMS) from patients with HF to evaluate the direct biomechanical effects of OM as compared to dobutamine. LMS were produced from patients with end-stage HF undergoing cardiac transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation and cultured under electromechanical stimulation (diastolic preload: ca. 1 mN, stimulation frequency: 0.5 Hz). Dobutamine and omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) were administered on consecutive days and biomechanical effects were continuously recorded with dedicated force transducers. OM and dobutamine significantly increased contractile force to a similar maximum force, but OM also increased median time-to-peak with 48 % (<em>p</em> = 0.046) and time-to-relaxation with 68 % (<em>p</em> = 0.045). OM administration led to impaired relaxation of HF LMS with increasing stimulation frequencies, which was not observed with dobutamine. Furthermore, the functional refractory period was significantly shorter after administration of OM compared to dobutamine (235 ms (200–265) vs. 270 ms (259–283), <em>p</em> = 0.035). In conclusion, OM increased contractile force and systolic duration of HF LMS, indicating an improvement in cardiac function and normalization of systolic time intervals in patients with HF. Conversely, OM slowed relaxation, which could lead to diastolic filling abnormalities. As such, OM showed benefits on systolic function on one hand but potential hindrances of diastolic function on the other hand.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100040\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772976123000107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772976123000107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
心力衰竭(HF)是一种快速增长的流行病,而医疗选择仍然有限。Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM)是一种直接作用于心肌肌凝蛋白头的新型心衰药物。本研究使用心衰患者的活体心肌切片(LMS)来评估OM与多巴酚丁胺的直接生物力学效应。LMS是由接受心脏移植或左心室辅助装置植入的终末期HF患者产生的,并在机电刺激(舒张预负荷:约1 mN,刺激频率:0.5 Hz)下培养。连续给予多巴酚丁胺和欧米伽咪唑(omecamtiv mecarbil, OM),用专用力传感器连续记录生物力学效应。OM和多巴酚丁胺显著增加收缩力至相似的最大力,但OM也增加中位峰值时间48% (p = 0.046)和松弛时间68% (p = 0.045)。随着刺激频率的增加,OM会导致HF LMS的松弛受损,而多巴酚丁胺则没有观察到这一点。此外,与多巴酚丁胺相比,给予OM后的功能性不应期显著缩短(235 ms (200-265) vs 270 ms (259-283), p = 0.035)。综上所述,OM增加了HF LMS的收缩力和收缩持续时间,表明HF患者心功能的改善和收缩时间间隔的正常化。相反,OM减慢松弛,这可能导致舒张充盈异常。因此,OM一方面对收缩功能有好处,另一方面对舒张功能有潜在的阻碍。
Omecamtiv mecarbil in precision-cut living heart failure slices: A story of a double-edged sword
Heart failure (HF) is a rapidly growing pandemic while medical treatment options remain limited. Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is a novel HF drug that directly targets the myosin heads of the cardiac muscle. This study used living myocardial slices (LMS) from patients with HF to evaluate the direct biomechanical effects of OM as compared to dobutamine. LMS were produced from patients with end-stage HF undergoing cardiac transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation and cultured under electromechanical stimulation (diastolic preload: ca. 1 mN, stimulation frequency: 0.5 Hz). Dobutamine and omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) were administered on consecutive days and biomechanical effects were continuously recorded with dedicated force transducers. OM and dobutamine significantly increased contractile force to a similar maximum force, but OM also increased median time-to-peak with 48 % (p = 0.046) and time-to-relaxation with 68 % (p = 0.045). OM administration led to impaired relaxation of HF LMS with increasing stimulation frequencies, which was not observed with dobutamine. Furthermore, the functional refractory period was significantly shorter after administration of OM compared to dobutamine (235 ms (200–265) vs. 270 ms (259–283), p = 0.035). In conclusion, OM increased contractile force and systolic duration of HF LMS, indicating an improvement in cardiac function and normalization of systolic time intervals in patients with HF. Conversely, OM slowed relaxation, which could lead to diastolic filling abnormalities. As such, OM showed benefits on systolic function on one hand but potential hindrances of diastolic function on the other hand.