1903年商业关系条约:中国与治外法权

IF 0.5 Q3 LAW
Raphaëlle P Soffe
{"title":"1903年商业关系条约:中国与治外法权","authors":"Raphaëlle P Soffe","doi":"10.1093/cjcl/cxaa005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The history of United States and Chinese intellectual property relations formally began with the signing of the Treaty as to Commercial Relations in 1903. The next three years saw the Chinese government frequently present revised versions of the 1903 Treaty’s implementation terms, with the 1905 Shangpu Draft responding to foreign merchant requests by removing its commitment to extraterritoriality—a regime whereby Western citizens in China were subject solely to the laws of their own country and not to Chinese laws. In this article, I document the intellectual property violations by Americans and Europeans in China, and how the legal case made by China for the removal of extraterritoriality, specifically for intellectual property violations, was a sign in itself that China was increasingly attentive to the mechanisms and constraints involved in legal reform. The collapse of the negotiations in 1906 would serve as a critical juncture in the commitment and interest of China to pursue intellectual property reform, with the US and China not signing another treaty concerning copyright until 1946. The refusal by the US to compromise on extraterritoriality contributed, in part, to the ‘four decades of inaction’ in intellectual property affairs.","PeriodicalId":42366,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Comparative Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/cjcl/cxaa005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Treaty as to Commercial Relations of 1903: China and Extraterritoriality\",\"authors\":\"Raphaëlle P Soffe\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cjcl/cxaa005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The history of United States and Chinese intellectual property relations formally began with the signing of the Treaty as to Commercial Relations in 1903. The next three years saw the Chinese government frequently present revised versions of the 1903 Treaty’s implementation terms, with the 1905 Shangpu Draft responding to foreign merchant requests by removing its commitment to extraterritoriality—a regime whereby Western citizens in China were subject solely to the laws of their own country and not to Chinese laws. In this article, I document the intellectual property violations by Americans and Europeans in China, and how the legal case made by China for the removal of extraterritoriality, specifically for intellectual property violations, was a sign in itself that China was increasingly attentive to the mechanisms and constraints involved in legal reform. The collapse of the negotiations in 1906 would serve as a critical juncture in the commitment and interest of China to pursue intellectual property reform, with the US and China not signing another treaty concerning copyright until 1946. The refusal by the US to compromise on extraterritoriality contributed, in part, to the ‘four decades of inaction’ in intellectual property affairs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Comparative Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/cjcl/cxaa005\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxaa005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxaa005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国和中国知识产权关系的历史正式开始于1903年签署的《通商关系条约》。在接下来的三年里,中国政府经常对1903年条约的实施条款进行修订,1905年的《上铺草案》回应了外国商人的要求,取消了对治外法权的承诺——治外法权是指在中国的西方公民只服从他们自己国家的法律,而不受中国法律的约束。在这篇文章中,我记录了美国人和欧洲人在中国侵犯知识产权的行为,以及中国为取消治外法权(特别是侵犯知识产权的行为)而提起的法律诉讼,这本身就是一个迹象,表明中国越来越关注法律改革所涉及的机制和约束。1906年谈判的破裂将成为中国追求知识产权改革的承诺和利益的关键时刻,直到1946年,美国和中国才签署了另一项有关版权的条约。美国拒绝在治外法权问题上妥协,在一定程度上导致了美国在知识产权事务上“四十年不作为”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Treaty as to Commercial Relations of 1903: China and Extraterritoriality
The history of United States and Chinese intellectual property relations formally began with the signing of the Treaty as to Commercial Relations in 1903. The next three years saw the Chinese government frequently present revised versions of the 1903 Treaty’s implementation terms, with the 1905 Shangpu Draft responding to foreign merchant requests by removing its commitment to extraterritoriality—a regime whereby Western citizens in China were subject solely to the laws of their own country and not to Chinese laws. In this article, I document the intellectual property violations by Americans and Europeans in China, and how the legal case made by China for the removal of extraterritoriality, specifically for intellectual property violations, was a sign in itself that China was increasingly attentive to the mechanisms and constraints involved in legal reform. The collapse of the negotiations in 1906 would serve as a critical juncture in the commitment and interest of China to pursue intellectual property reform, with the US and China not signing another treaty concerning copyright until 1946. The refusal by the US to compromise on extraterritoriality contributed, in part, to the ‘four decades of inaction’ in intellectual property affairs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law (CJCL) is an independent, peer-reviewed, general comparative law journal published under the auspices of the International Academy of Comparative Law (IACL) and in association with the Silk Road Institute for International and Comparative Law (SRIICL) at Xi’an Jiaotong University, PR China. CJCL aims to provide a leading international forum for comparative studies on all disciplines of law, including cross-disciplinary legal studies. It gives preference to articles addressing issues of fundamental and lasting importance in the field of comparative law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信