梅特里亚、狄德罗与公共利益的敌人

G. Ratto
{"title":"梅特里亚、狄德罗与公共利益的敌人","authors":"G. Ratto","doi":"10.24215/23142553E027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the entry “Droit naturel” of the Encyclopedie, Diderot posits that it is rightful to annihilate the enemies of society. We might construe this statement to be aimed at, among others, La Mettrie; particularly his Discours sur le bonheur, which Diderot would explicitly criticize a few years later. The aim of this paper is to prove that La Mettrie’s position towards those individuals who do not submit their will to social duties is closer to that of Diderot than he could have imagined. Moreover, the work draws on certain tensions that threaten the consistency of Discours.","PeriodicalId":29670,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Filosofia y Teoria Politica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La Mettrie, Diderot y los enemigos del interés público\",\"authors\":\"G. Ratto\",\"doi\":\"10.24215/23142553E027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the entry “Droit naturel” of the Encyclopedie, Diderot posits that it is rightful to annihilate the enemies of society. We might construe this statement to be aimed at, among others, La Mettrie; particularly his Discours sur le bonheur, which Diderot would explicitly criticize a few years later. The aim of this paper is to prove that La Mettrie’s position towards those individuals who do not submit their will to social duties is closer to that of Diderot than he could have imagined. Moreover, the work draws on certain tensions that threaten the consistency of Discours.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Filosofia y Teoria Politica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Filosofia y Teoria Politica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24215/23142553E027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Filosofia y Teoria Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24215/23142553E027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《百科全书》的词条“自然权利”中,狄德罗认为消灭社会的敌人是正当的。我们可以把这句话解释为,除其他外,针对拉梅特里;尤其是他的《论人类的尊严》,几年后狄德罗明确地批评了这本书。本文的目的是证明拉梅特里对那些不服从社会义务的个人的立场比他想象的更接近狄德罗。此外,这部作品利用了某些威胁到话语一致性的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La Mettrie, Diderot y los enemigos del interés público
In the entry “Droit naturel” of the Encyclopedie, Diderot posits that it is rightful to annihilate the enemies of society. We might construe this statement to be aimed at, among others, La Mettrie; particularly his Discours sur le bonheur, which Diderot would explicitly criticize a few years later. The aim of this paper is to prove that La Mettrie’s position towards those individuals who do not submit their will to social duties is closer to that of Diderot than he could have imagined. Moreover, the work draws on certain tensions that threaten the consistency of Discours.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信