市售无麸质面包产品的案例研究:储存过程中的质地变化和感官分析

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Marcell Tóth, T. Kaszab, A. Lambert-Meretei
{"title":"市售无麸质面包产品的案例研究:储存过程中的质地变化和感官分析","authors":"Marcell Tóth, T. Kaszab, A. Lambert-Meretei","doi":"10.1556/446.2022.00039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Gluten-free (GF) breads are often described with low quality, rapidly staling, dry mouthfeel and crumbling texture attributes. In lack of recent texture profile data on commercially available, preservative-free, freshly-baked GF bread, this study aimed to compare different types of GF products with their wheat-based counterparts during a 4-day-long storage test. Texture analysis data showed that GF loaves performed better than or comparable to the wheat-based ones in hardness, springiness and cohesiveness. Among sensorial properties mouth-feel, softness and aroma were evaluated as significantly better or similar for GF versus wheat-based products. GF cob had a saltier taste, which reduced the flavour experience. Both the texture results of the storage test and sensory data showed that the quality of GF bread products improved in recent years; they stayed comparable with their wheat-based counterparts even during a 4-day-long storage period.","PeriodicalId":20837,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case study of commercially available gluten-free bread products: Texture changes during storage and sensory analysis\",\"authors\":\"Marcell Tóth, T. Kaszab, A. Lambert-Meretei\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/446.2022.00039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Gluten-free (GF) breads are often described with low quality, rapidly staling, dry mouthfeel and crumbling texture attributes. In lack of recent texture profile data on commercially available, preservative-free, freshly-baked GF bread, this study aimed to compare different types of GF products with their wheat-based counterparts during a 4-day-long storage test. Texture analysis data showed that GF loaves performed better than or comparable to the wheat-based ones in hardness, springiness and cohesiveness. Among sensorial properties mouth-feel, softness and aroma were evaluated as significantly better or similar for GF versus wheat-based products. GF cob had a saltier taste, which reduced the flavour experience. Both the texture results of the storage test and sensory data showed that the quality of GF bread products improved in recent years; they stayed comparable with their wheat-based counterparts even during a 4-day-long storage period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/446.2022.00039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/446.2022.00039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无麸质(GF)面包通常被描述为质量低、快速老化、口感干燥和质地破碎。由于缺乏市面上可买到的不含防腐剂的新鲜烘焙GF面包的最新质地数据,本研究旨在在为期4天的储存测试中,将不同类型的GF产品与小麦制品进行比较。质地分析数据表明,GF面包在硬度、弹性和内聚性方面优于或可与小麦面包相媲美。在感官特性中,GF产品的口感、柔软度和香气明显优于或类似于小麦产品。GF玉米芯的味道更咸,这减少了味道体验。贮藏试验的质地结果和感官数据都表明,近年来GF面包产品的质量有所提高;即使在4天的储存期内,它们也能与小麦品种的同类保持相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Case study of commercially available gluten-free bread products: Texture changes during storage and sensory analysis
Gluten-free (GF) breads are often described with low quality, rapidly staling, dry mouthfeel and crumbling texture attributes. In lack of recent texture profile data on commercially available, preservative-free, freshly-baked GF bread, this study aimed to compare different types of GF products with their wheat-based counterparts during a 4-day-long storage test. Texture analysis data showed that GF loaves performed better than or comparable to the wheat-based ones in hardness, springiness and cohesiveness. Among sensorial properties mouth-feel, softness and aroma were evaluated as significantly better or similar for GF versus wheat-based products. GF cob had a saltier taste, which reduced the flavour experience. Both the texture results of the storage test and sensory data showed that the quality of GF bread products improved in recent years; they stayed comparable with their wheat-based counterparts even during a 4-day-long storage period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences
Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original papers, review papers and preliminary communications in the field of agricultural, environmental and process engineering. The main purpose is to show new scientific results, new developments and procedures with special respect to the engineering of crop production and animal husbandry, soil and water management, precision agriculture, information technology in agriculture, advancements in instrumentation and automation, technical and safety aspects of environmental and food engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信