儿童阑尾炎超声检查有助于选择手术吗?

Matthew L. M. Jones
{"title":"儿童阑尾炎超声检查有助于选择手术吗?","authors":"Matthew L. M. Jones","doi":"10.19080/AJPN.2020.09.555822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To determine whether the use of ultrasound (USS) assists in the diagnosis of appendicitis in paediatric patients. Method: A retrospective study of patients <14 years, referred to paediatric surgery with possible appendicitis from Jul 2015 to Nov 2016. Groups were based on the decision to admit with or without USS and their Alvarado scores (AS). Diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology. Outcomes were missed appendicitis, negative appendicectomy rate (NAR), and specificity of diagnosis. Results: 234 patients were included. 126 (54%) underwent appendicectomy and 102 (44%) had appendicitis. USS was performed in 163 patients (70%) and was 83% sensitive and 87% specific. Clinical diagnosis had greater specificity with USS 88% (CI 95%, 80-93) than without USS 59% (39-78). There was no significant difference in the NAR with USS (18%) and without (20%). All 29 patients AS 9-10 had appendicitis of these 15 (52%) had USS prior to theatre. None of the 30 patients AS 0-3 had appendicitis. In the group of 98 patients AS 6-8, those 59 who had an USS had a NAR of 2.86% and specificity of 96% (80-100), compared to NAR of 20% and specificity of 36% (11-69) in the 39 patients without. Conclusion: USS aids diagnostic accuracy through increasing the specificity, it does not benefit in AS ≥9 and ≤3 where the diagnosis is clinically evident. Consideration should be made to reduce these USS to lessen referral delay, hospital expense and misleading clinical decision-making. USS appears most useful in patients AS 6-8, with improved outcomes identified.","PeriodicalId":93160,"journal":{"name":"Academic journal of pediatric and neonatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Ultrasounding Children Referred for Appendicitis Aid the Choice to Operate?\",\"authors\":\"Matthew L. M. Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.19080/AJPN.2020.09.555822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To determine whether the use of ultrasound (USS) assists in the diagnosis of appendicitis in paediatric patients. Method: A retrospective study of patients <14 years, referred to paediatric surgery with possible appendicitis from Jul 2015 to Nov 2016. Groups were based on the decision to admit with or without USS and their Alvarado scores (AS). Diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology. Outcomes were missed appendicitis, negative appendicectomy rate (NAR), and specificity of diagnosis. Results: 234 patients were included. 126 (54%) underwent appendicectomy and 102 (44%) had appendicitis. USS was performed in 163 patients (70%) and was 83% sensitive and 87% specific. Clinical diagnosis had greater specificity with USS 88% (CI 95%, 80-93) than without USS 59% (39-78). There was no significant difference in the NAR with USS (18%) and without (20%). All 29 patients AS 9-10 had appendicitis of these 15 (52%) had USS prior to theatre. None of the 30 patients AS 0-3 had appendicitis. In the group of 98 patients AS 6-8, those 59 who had an USS had a NAR of 2.86% and specificity of 96% (80-100), compared to NAR of 20% and specificity of 36% (11-69) in the 39 patients without. Conclusion: USS aids diagnostic accuracy through increasing the specificity, it does not benefit in AS ≥9 and ≤3 where the diagnosis is clinically evident. Consideration should be made to reduce these USS to lessen referral delay, hospital expense and misleading clinical decision-making. USS appears most useful in patients AS 6-8, with improved outcomes identified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic journal of pediatric and neonatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic journal of pediatric and neonatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19080/AJPN.2020.09.555822\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic journal of pediatric and neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/AJPN.2020.09.555822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨超声对小儿阑尾炎诊断的辅助作用。方法:回顾性研究2015年7月至2016年11月间在儿科外科就诊的可能存在阑尾炎的<14岁患者。小组是根据是否有USS和他们的阿尔瓦拉多分数(AS)来决定录取的。经组织病理学证实。结果是阑尾炎漏诊、阑尾切除术阴性率(NAR)和诊断特异性。结果:纳入234例患者。126例(54%)行阑尾切除术,102例(44%)患阑尾炎。在163例(70%)患者中进行了USS,敏感性为83%,特异性为87%。临床诊断具有更高的特异性,usus88% (CI 95%, 80-93),而没有usus59% (CI 39-78)。有USS的NAR(18%)和没有USS的NAR(20%)没有显著差异。29例患者AS 9-10均有阑尾炎,其中15例(52%)术前有阑尾炎。30例患者as0 -3均无阑尾炎。在98例AS 6-8患者中,59例有USS患者的NAR为2.86%,特异性为96%(80-100),而39例无USS患者的NAR为20%,特异性为36%(11-69)。结论:USS通过提高特异性来提高诊断准确性,但在AS≥9和≤3且临床诊断明显的情况下,USS无优势。应考虑减少这些USS,以减少转诊延误,医院费用和误导临床决策。USS在AS 6-8患者中最有用,预后得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Ultrasounding Children Referred for Appendicitis Aid the Choice to Operate?
Purpose: To determine whether the use of ultrasound (USS) assists in the diagnosis of appendicitis in paediatric patients. Method: A retrospective study of patients <14 years, referred to paediatric surgery with possible appendicitis from Jul 2015 to Nov 2016. Groups were based on the decision to admit with or without USS and their Alvarado scores (AS). Diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology. Outcomes were missed appendicitis, negative appendicectomy rate (NAR), and specificity of diagnosis. Results: 234 patients were included. 126 (54%) underwent appendicectomy and 102 (44%) had appendicitis. USS was performed in 163 patients (70%) and was 83% sensitive and 87% specific. Clinical diagnosis had greater specificity with USS 88% (CI 95%, 80-93) than without USS 59% (39-78). There was no significant difference in the NAR with USS (18%) and without (20%). All 29 patients AS 9-10 had appendicitis of these 15 (52%) had USS prior to theatre. None of the 30 patients AS 0-3 had appendicitis. In the group of 98 patients AS 6-8, those 59 who had an USS had a NAR of 2.86% and specificity of 96% (80-100), compared to NAR of 20% and specificity of 36% (11-69) in the 39 patients without. Conclusion: USS aids diagnostic accuracy through increasing the specificity, it does not benefit in AS ≥9 and ≤3 where the diagnosis is clinically evident. Consideration should be made to reduce these USS to lessen referral delay, hospital expense and misleading clinical decision-making. USS appears most useful in patients AS 6-8, with improved outcomes identified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信