哪里有意愿，哪里就有“为什么？”第二部分：价值决定论对客观主义“价值”、“牺牲”、“美德”、“义务”和“责任”概念的启示

Q1 Arts and Humanities

The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.5325/jaynrandstud.22.2.0251

Roger E. Bissell

{"title":"哪里有意愿，哪里就有“为什么？”第二部分：价值决定论对客观主义“价值”、“牺牲”、“美德”、“义务”和“责任”概念的启示","authors":"Roger E. Bissell","doi":"10.5325/jaynrandstud.22.2.0251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:The author continues his challenge to the \"official\" Objectivist view of free will by addressing the implications of his value-determinism/conditional-volition model for various Objectivist moral concepts including value, sacrifice, virtue, obligation, and moral and legal responsibility and accountability. He argues that based on Rand's definitions, the conventional understandings of sacrifice or betrayal of values, lapses in virtue, and breaches in morality need considerable reconceptualizing. The author gives special attention to Rand and Kant with regard to lying, use of force, and acts of generosity, finding not nearly as much difference between them as is commonly believed.","PeriodicalId":35149,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"251 - 317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where There's a Will, There's a \\\"Why?\\\" Part 2: Implications of Value Determinism for the Objectivist Concepts of \\\"Value,\\\" \\\"Sacrifice,\\\" \\\"Virtue,\\\" \\\"Obligation,\\\" and \\\"Responsibility\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Roger E. Bissell\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/jaynrandstud.22.2.0251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:The author continues his challenge to the \\\"official\\\" Objectivist view of free will by addressing the implications of his value-determinism/conditional-volition model for various Objectivist moral concepts including value, sacrifice, virtue, obligation, and moral and legal responsibility and accountability. He argues that based on Rand's definitions, the conventional understandings of sacrifice or betrayal of values, lapses in virtue, and breaches in morality need considerable reconceptualizing. The author gives special attention to Rand and Kant with regard to lying, use of force, and acts of generosity, finding not nearly as much difference between them as is commonly believed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"251 - 317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/jaynrandstud.22.2.0251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jaynrandstud.22.2.0251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:作者通过阐述价值决定论/条件意志模型对价值、牺牲、美德、义务、道德和法律责任和问责等客观主义道德概念的影响，继续挑战“官方的”客观主义自由意志观。他认为，基于兰德的定义，对牺牲或背叛价值观、丧失美德和违反道德的传统理解需要重新概念化。作者特别关注了兰德和康德在说谎、使用武力和慷慨行为方面的观点，发现他们之间的差异并不像人们普遍认为的那样大。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Where There's a Will, There's a "Why?" Part 2: Implications of Value Determinism for the Objectivist Concepts of "Value," "Sacrifice," "Virtue," "Obligation," and "Responsibility"

ABSTRACT:The author continues his challenge to the "official" Objectivist view of free will by addressing the implications of his value-determinism/conditional-volition model for various Objectivist moral concepts including value, sacrifice, virtue, obligation, and moral and legal responsibility and accountability. He argues that based on Rand's definitions, the conventional understandings of sacrifice or betrayal of values, lapses in virtue, and breaches in morality need considerable reconceptualizing. The author gives special attention to Rand and Kant with regard to lying, use of force, and acts of generosity, finding not nearly as much difference between them as is commonly believed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundation has entered into an electronic licensing relationship with EBSCO Publishing, the world"s most prolific aggregator of full-text journals, magazines, and other sources. The full text of The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies can be found on EBSCO Publishing"s databases. A nonpartisan journal devoted to the study of Ayn Rand and her times. The journal is not aligned with any advocacy group, institute, or person. It welcomes papers from every discipline and from a variety of interpretive and critical perspectives. It aims to foster scholarly dialogue through a respectful exchange of ideas. The journal is published semi-annually, in the fall and the spring.