对2019冠状病毒病大流行期间与必要和非必要工作人员有关的性骚扰和斯德哥尔摩综合症的实证研究

IF 1.6 4区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Kenzie J. Hurley, Valerie J. Morganson
{"title":"对2019冠状病毒病大流行期间与必要和非必要工作人员有关的性骚扰和斯德哥尔摩综合症的实证研究","authors":"Kenzie J. Hurley, Valerie J. Morganson","doi":"10.1080/13552600.2022.2053889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As COVID-19 spread and organisations shut down, many workers continued working through adverse conditions. This study appropriates Stockholm syndrome to highlight privilege and power differentials between essential and non-essential workers during the pandemic. One hundred and twelve U.S. workers (Mage = 35.91, 50.9% female, 49% essential workers, Mhours worked per week  = 48.11) completed an online survey during the height of national lockdowns (April to June of 2020). Results of correlations and a one-way multivariate analysis of variance suggest that Stockholm syndrome and sexual harassment are strongly related and that essential workers scored higher on both Stockholm syndrome and sexual harrassment than non-essential workers. The present study supports Stockholm syndrome as a framework for studying workplace injustice and contributes to novel literature regarding how the pandemic has exacerbated social inequities. Practical implications draw from existing literature on sexual harrassment and demonstrate the need for awareness of worker mistreatment during challenging times.","PeriodicalId":46758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sexual Aggression","volume":"29 1","pages":"243 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical examination of sexual harassment and Stockholm syndrome in relation to essential and non-essential workers during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Kenzie J. Hurley, Valerie J. Morganson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13552600.2022.2053889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT As COVID-19 spread and organisations shut down, many workers continued working through adverse conditions. This study appropriates Stockholm syndrome to highlight privilege and power differentials between essential and non-essential workers during the pandemic. One hundred and twelve U.S. workers (Mage = 35.91, 50.9% female, 49% essential workers, Mhours worked per week  = 48.11) completed an online survey during the height of national lockdowns (April to June of 2020). Results of correlations and a one-way multivariate analysis of variance suggest that Stockholm syndrome and sexual harassment are strongly related and that essential workers scored higher on both Stockholm syndrome and sexual harrassment than non-essential workers. The present study supports Stockholm syndrome as a framework for studying workplace injustice and contributes to novel literature regarding how the pandemic has exacerbated social inequities. Practical implications draw from existing literature on sexual harrassment and demonstrate the need for awareness of worker mistreatment during challenging times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sexual Aggression\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"243 - 255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sexual Aggression\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2022.2053889\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sexual Aggression","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2022.2053889","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

随着COVID-19的传播和组织的关闭,许多工人在恶劣的条件下继续工作。本研究利用斯德哥尔摩综合症来突出大流行期间基本工作者和非基本工作者之间的特权和权力差异。在全国封锁高峰期(2020年4月至6月),112名美国工人(男性= 35.91,女性50.9%,必要工人49%,每周工作小时数= 48.11)完成了一项在线调查。相关性和单向多变量方差分析的结果表明,斯德哥尔摩综合症和性骚扰密切相关,关键工人在斯德哥尔摩综合症和性骚扰方面的得分都高于非关键工人。本研究支持将斯德哥尔摩综合症作为研究工作场所不公正的框架,并有助于提供关于该流行病如何加剧社会不平等的新文献。从现有的关于性骚扰的文献中得出实际意义,并证明在充满挑战的时期需要意识到工人的虐待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An empirical examination of sexual harassment and Stockholm syndrome in relation to essential and non-essential workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
ABSTRACT As COVID-19 spread and organisations shut down, many workers continued working through adverse conditions. This study appropriates Stockholm syndrome to highlight privilege and power differentials between essential and non-essential workers during the pandemic. One hundred and twelve U.S. workers (Mage = 35.91, 50.9% female, 49% essential workers, Mhours worked per week  = 48.11) completed an online survey during the height of national lockdowns (April to June of 2020). Results of correlations and a one-way multivariate analysis of variance suggest that Stockholm syndrome and sexual harassment are strongly related and that essential workers scored higher on both Stockholm syndrome and sexual harrassment than non-essential workers. The present study supports Stockholm syndrome as a framework for studying workplace injustice and contributes to novel literature regarding how the pandemic has exacerbated social inequities. Practical implications draw from existing literature on sexual harrassment and demonstrate the need for awareness of worker mistreatment during challenging times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sexual Aggression
Journal of Sexual Aggression CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信