儿童保育与婴幼儿早期教育

4区 法学 Q1 Social Sciences
A. Chaudry, H. Sandstrom
{"title":"儿童保育与婴幼儿早期教育","authors":"A. Chaudry, H. Sandstrom","doi":"10.1353/foc.2020.a807756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary:In this article, Ajay Chaudry and Heather Sandstrom review research on child care and early education for children under age three. They describe the array of early care and education arrangements families use for infants and toddlers; how these patterns have changed in recent decades; and differences by family socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity.Chaudry and Sandstrom note that families face many challenges both in getting access to child care and in finding care of more than mediocre quality. These challenges include limited supply and limited affordability relative to the needs of working parents and those pursuing education. Other challenges are based on families’ and children’s circumstances; for example, parents may work nontraditional or variable hours, or children may have special developmental needs.Although experts agree that the quality of children’s care is important for their learning and development, the authors write, there is no consensus on how to best measure quality and what factors are most important. They review what we know about the quality of infant and toddler child care in the United States, why child care quality matters for children’s learning and development, and how the federal government as well as the states are trying to improve child care quality.Chaudry and Sandstrom also examine the major public programs that support early care and education, primarily for children in low-income families—child care subsidies, tax credits, and the Early Head Start program. Overall, they note, the United States’ public investment in quality child care and early education is relatively minimal, though bold proposals to bolster that investment are now on the table.","PeriodicalId":51448,"journal":{"name":"Future of Children","volume":"30 1","pages":"165 - 190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Child Care and Early Education for Infants and Toddlers\",\"authors\":\"A. Chaudry, H. Sandstrom\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/foc.2020.a807756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary:In this article, Ajay Chaudry and Heather Sandstrom review research on child care and early education for children under age three. They describe the array of early care and education arrangements families use for infants and toddlers; how these patterns have changed in recent decades; and differences by family socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity.Chaudry and Sandstrom note that families face many challenges both in getting access to child care and in finding care of more than mediocre quality. These challenges include limited supply and limited affordability relative to the needs of working parents and those pursuing education. Other challenges are based on families’ and children’s circumstances; for example, parents may work nontraditional or variable hours, or children may have special developmental needs.Although experts agree that the quality of children’s care is important for their learning and development, the authors write, there is no consensus on how to best measure quality and what factors are most important. They review what we know about the quality of infant and toddler child care in the United States, why child care quality matters for children’s learning and development, and how the federal government as well as the states are trying to improve child care quality.Chaudry and Sandstrom also examine the major public programs that support early care and education, primarily for children in low-income families—child care subsidies, tax credits, and the Early Head Start program. Overall, they note, the United States’ public investment in quality child care and early education is relatively minimal, though bold proposals to bolster that investment are now on the table.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future of Children\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"165 - 190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future of Children\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2020.a807756\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"法学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future of Children","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2020.a807756","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"法学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

综述:在这篇文章中,Ajay Chaudry和Heather Sandstrom回顾了关于三岁以下儿童保育和早期教育的研究。它们描述了家庭为婴幼儿使用的一系列早期护理和教育安排;近几十年来,这些模式发生了怎样的变化;以及家庭社会经济地位、种族和民族的差异。Chaudry和Sandstrom指出,家庭在获得儿童保育和寻找质量平平的护理方面都面临着许多挑战。这些挑战包括相对于在职父母和追求教育的人的需求,供应有限,负担能力有限。其他挑战是基于家庭和儿童的情况;例如,父母可能非传统或可变的工作时间,或者孩子可能有特殊的发展需求。作者写道,尽管专家们一致认为,儿童的护理质量对他们的学习和发展很重要,但对于如何最好地衡量质量以及哪些因素最重要,还没有达成共识。他们回顾了我们对美国婴幼儿保育质量的了解,为什么儿童保育质量对儿童的学习和发展至关重要,以及联邦政府和各州如何努力提高儿童保育质量。Chaudry和Sandstrom还研究了支持早期护理和教育的主要公共项目,主要针对低收入家庭的儿童——儿童保育补贴、税收抵免和早期启动计划。他们指出,总体而言,美国在优质儿童保育和早期教育方面的公共投资相对较少,尽管目前正在讨论加强这一投资的大胆建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Child Care and Early Education for Infants and Toddlers
Summary:In this article, Ajay Chaudry and Heather Sandstrom review research on child care and early education for children under age three. They describe the array of early care and education arrangements families use for infants and toddlers; how these patterns have changed in recent decades; and differences by family socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity.Chaudry and Sandstrom note that families face many challenges both in getting access to child care and in finding care of more than mediocre quality. These challenges include limited supply and limited affordability relative to the needs of working parents and those pursuing education. Other challenges are based on families’ and children’s circumstances; for example, parents may work nontraditional or variable hours, or children may have special developmental needs.Although experts agree that the quality of children’s care is important for their learning and development, the authors write, there is no consensus on how to best measure quality and what factors are most important. They review what we know about the quality of infant and toddler child care in the United States, why child care quality matters for children’s learning and development, and how the federal government as well as the states are trying to improve child care quality.Chaudry and Sandstrom also examine the major public programs that support early care and education, primarily for children in low-income families—child care subsidies, tax credits, and the Early Head Start program. Overall, they note, the United States’ public investment in quality child care and early education is relatively minimal, though bold proposals to bolster that investment are now on the table.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future of Children
Future of Children Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Future of Children is a collaboration of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University and the Brookings Institution. The mission of The Future of Children is to translate the best social science research about children and youth into information that is useful to policymakers, practitioners, grant-makers, advocates, the media, and students of public policy. The project publishes two journals and policy briefs each year, and provides various short summaries of our work. Topics range widely -- from income policy to family issues to education and health – with children’s policy as the unifying element. The senior editorial team is diverse, representing two institutions and multiple disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信