Covid-19大流行期间在线科学课中的在线口头辩论互动(OVAI

P. Archila, Anne-Marie Truscott de Mejía, Silvia Restrepo
{"title":"Covid-19大流行期间在线科学课中的在线口头辩论互动(OVAI","authors":"P. Archila, Anne-Marie Truscott de Mejía, Silvia Restrepo","doi":"10.24059/olj.v26i4.2985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As we begin the third decade of the twenty-first century, argument and debate are not habitual practices of university science education. This can be explained by the hegemony of instructor-centered traditional approaches in many of these practices. The Covid-19 pandemic has not only pushed university education online but also seems to provide an unforeseen opportunity to develop deep educational transformations. Here, we report on the case of a university online science course that, because of the Covid-19 crisis, used online verbal argumentative interaction (OVAI) to provide students with explicit opportunities to co-construct reason-based and/or evidence-based arguments and counterarguments in an undergraduate-centered science learning environment. The written arguments and counterarguments co-constructed by forty students (20 females and 20 males, 19–24 years old) during OVAI sessions were analyzed to determine their quality. Also, students’ opinions about the use of OVAI in times of Covid-19 were documented. The results indicate that the students co-constructed high-quality arguments and counterarguments in the OVAI sessions. Most importantly, participants showed positive impressions about the use of OVAI in university online science education. The outcomes carry important educational implications considering the growing university online science courses in the pandemic and post-pandemic eras.","PeriodicalId":93037,"journal":{"name":"Online learning : the official journal of the Online Learning Consortium","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online Verbal Argumentative Interaction (OVAI) in an Online Science Class During the Covid-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"P. Archila, Anne-Marie Truscott de Mejía, Silvia Restrepo\",\"doi\":\"10.24059/olj.v26i4.2985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As we begin the third decade of the twenty-first century, argument and debate are not habitual practices of university science education. This can be explained by the hegemony of instructor-centered traditional approaches in many of these practices. The Covid-19 pandemic has not only pushed university education online but also seems to provide an unforeseen opportunity to develop deep educational transformations. Here, we report on the case of a university online science course that, because of the Covid-19 crisis, used online verbal argumentative interaction (OVAI) to provide students with explicit opportunities to co-construct reason-based and/or evidence-based arguments and counterarguments in an undergraduate-centered science learning environment. The written arguments and counterarguments co-constructed by forty students (20 females and 20 males, 19–24 years old) during OVAI sessions were analyzed to determine their quality. Also, students’ opinions about the use of OVAI in times of Covid-19 were documented. The results indicate that the students co-constructed high-quality arguments and counterarguments in the OVAI sessions. Most importantly, participants showed positive impressions about the use of OVAI in university online science education. The outcomes carry important educational implications considering the growing university online science courses in the pandemic and post-pandemic eras.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online learning : the official journal of the Online Learning Consortium\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online learning : the official journal of the Online Learning Consortium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i4.2985\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online learning : the official journal of the Online Learning Consortium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i4.2985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在我们进入21世纪的第三个十年之际,争论和辩论不再是大学科学教育的惯常做法。这可以解释为在许多实践中以教师为中心的传统方法的霸权。新冠肺炎疫情不仅推动了大学教育的在线化,而且似乎为开展深度教育变革提供了一个不可预见的机会。在这里,我们报告了一所大学在线科学课程的案例,由于Covid-19危机,该课程使用在线口头辩论互动(OVAI)为学生提供明确的机会,在以本科生为中心的科学学习环境中共同构建基于理性和/或基于证据的论点和反驳。对40名学生(男女各20名,年龄19-24岁)在OVAI会议期间共同撰写的书面论点和反论点进行分析,以确定其质量。此外,还记录了学生对Covid-19期间使用OVAI的意见。结果表明,学生在OVAI课程中共同构建了高质量的论点和反论点。最重要的是,参与者对OVAI在大学在线科学教育中的使用表现出积极的印象。考虑到在大流行和大流行后时代不断增加的大学在线科学课程,研究结果具有重要的教育意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Online Verbal Argumentative Interaction (OVAI) in an Online Science Class During the Covid-19 Pandemic
As we begin the third decade of the twenty-first century, argument and debate are not habitual practices of university science education. This can be explained by the hegemony of instructor-centered traditional approaches in many of these practices. The Covid-19 pandemic has not only pushed university education online but also seems to provide an unforeseen opportunity to develop deep educational transformations. Here, we report on the case of a university online science course that, because of the Covid-19 crisis, used online verbal argumentative interaction (OVAI) to provide students with explicit opportunities to co-construct reason-based and/or evidence-based arguments and counterarguments in an undergraduate-centered science learning environment. The written arguments and counterarguments co-constructed by forty students (20 females and 20 males, 19–24 years old) during OVAI sessions were analyzed to determine their quality. Also, students’ opinions about the use of OVAI in times of Covid-19 were documented. The results indicate that the students co-constructed high-quality arguments and counterarguments in the OVAI sessions. Most importantly, participants showed positive impressions about the use of OVAI in university online science education. The outcomes carry important educational implications considering the growing university online science courses in the pandemic and post-pandemic eras.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信