泡沫杯：关于Valerius Flaccus Argonautica 1.815的文字说明

IF 0.7 2区历史学 0 CLASSICS

CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1086/721577

M. Heerink, Pieter van den Broek

{"title":"泡沫杯：关于Valerius Flaccus Argonautica 1.815的文字说明","authors":"M. Heerink, Pieter van den Broek","doi":"10.1086/721577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this note we argue that in line 815 of Book 1 of Valerius Flaccus’ Argonautica spumantia should be read—a reading of one manuscript, which was independently also conjectured by Nicolaas Heinsius—and not the manuscript reading fumantia, which is printed by all editors. We argue for the reading from three perspectives: the sacrificial context of the passage, the intratextual contact with another passage from the Argonautica, and the intricate intertextual contact with a passage from Silius Italicus’ Punica.","PeriodicalId":46255,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Foaming Cups: A Textual Note on Valerius Flaccus Argonautica 1.815\",\"authors\":\"M. Heerink, Pieter van den Broek\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/721577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this note we argue that in line 815 of Book 1 of Valerius Flaccus’ Argonautica spumantia should be read—a reading of one manuscript, which was independently also conjectured by Nicolaas Heinsius—and not the manuscript reading fumantia, which is printed by all editors. We argue for the reading from three perspectives: the sacrificial context of the passage, the intratextual contact with another passage from the Argonautica, and the intricate intertextual contact with a passage from Silius Italicus’ Punica.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/721577\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721577","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇注释中，我们认为，在Valerius Flaccus的Argonautica spumantia的第1卷第815行，应该阅读一份手稿，这也是由Nicolaas Heinsius独立推测的，而不是所有编辑印刷的阅读fumantia的手稿。我们从三个角度对阅读进行了论证：这段文字的牺牲语境，与《阿尔戈》中另一段文字的文本内接触，以及与西里乌斯·伊塔利库斯的《普尼察》中一段文字复杂的互文接触。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Foaming Cups: A Textual Note on Valerius Flaccus Argonautica 1.815

In this note we argue that in line 815 of Book 1 of Valerius Flaccus’ Argonautica spumantia should be read—a reading of one manuscript, which was independently also conjectured by Nicolaas Heinsius—and not the manuscript reading fumantia, which is printed by all editors. We argue for the reading from three perspectives: the sacrificial context of the passage, the intratextual contact with another passage from the Argonautica, and the intricate intertextual contact with a passage from Silius Italicus’ Punica.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Classical Philology has been an internationally respected journal for the study of the life, languages, and thought of the Ancient Greek and Roman world since 1906. CP covers a broad range of topics from a variety of interpretative points of view. CP welcomes both longer articles and short notes or discussions that make a significant contribution to the study of Greek and Roman antiquity. Any field of classical studies may be treated, separately or in relation to other disciplines, ancient or modern. In particular, we invite studies that illuminate aspects of the languages, literatures, history, art, philosophy, social life, and religion of ancient Greece and Rome. Innovative approaches and originality are encouraged as a necessary part of good scholarship.