新冠肺炎危机期间荷兰对雇员和独立工作者的收入支持措施比较

IF 0.8 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
G. Boot
{"title":"新冠肺炎危机期间荷兰对雇员和独立工作者的收入支持措施比较","authors":"G. Boot","doi":"10.54648/ijcl2022021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the nineties a non-protective policy in the Netherlands stimulated to work as an independent contractor. This resulted in huge numbers of bogus self-employed, because compared to employees they were much cheaper to contract. Since 2012 the intention was spoken out to limit these numbers, but an effective remedy has not yet been developed. During the Covid pandemic, massive financial aid was given to companies, independent workers and employees. This helped to limit the level of unemployment and bankruptcies, but the number of independent workers is still growing. So the financial aid given during the pandemic has not helped to bring bogus self-employed under the scope of the employment agreement.\nIndependent Workers and Employees in the Netherlands: Qualification, Difference in Costs and Financial Aid During Covid-Crisis","PeriodicalId":44213,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Income Support Measures in the Netherlands for Employees and Independent Workers During the Covid Crisis\",\"authors\":\"G. Boot\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/ijcl2022021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the nineties a non-protective policy in the Netherlands stimulated to work as an independent contractor. This resulted in huge numbers of bogus self-employed, because compared to employees they were much cheaper to contract. Since 2012 the intention was spoken out to limit these numbers, but an effective remedy has not yet been developed. During the Covid pandemic, massive financial aid was given to companies, independent workers and employees. This helped to limit the level of unemployment and bankruptcies, but the number of independent workers is still growing. So the financial aid given during the pandemic has not helped to bring bogus self-employed under the scope of the employment agreement.\\nIndependent Workers and Employees in the Netherlands: Qualification, Difference in Costs and Financial Aid During Covid-Crisis\",\"PeriodicalId\":44213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/ijcl2022021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ijcl2022021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自90年代以来,荷兰的一项非保护性政策刺激了作为独立承包商的工作。这导致了大量虚假的自营职业者,因为与员工相比,他们的合同成本要低得多。自2012年以来,有人公开表示打算限制这些数字,但尚未制定出有效的补救措施。在新冠肺炎疫情期间,向公司、独立工人和员工提供了大量财政援助。这有助于限制失业和破产的水平,但独立工作者的数量仍在增长。因此,疫情期间提供的财政援助并没有帮助将虚假的自营职业者纳入就业协议的范围。荷兰的独立工人和雇员:新冠疫情期间的资格、成本差异和财政援助
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Income Support Measures in the Netherlands for Employees and Independent Workers During the Covid Crisis
Since the nineties a non-protective policy in the Netherlands stimulated to work as an independent contractor. This resulted in huge numbers of bogus self-employed, because compared to employees they were much cheaper to contract. Since 2012 the intention was spoken out to limit these numbers, but an effective remedy has not yet been developed. During the Covid pandemic, massive financial aid was given to companies, independent workers and employees. This helped to limit the level of unemployment and bankruptcies, but the number of independent workers is still growing. So the financial aid given during the pandemic has not helped to bring bogus self-employed under the scope of the employment agreement. Independent Workers and Employees in the Netherlands: Qualification, Difference in Costs and Financial Aid During Covid-Crisis
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Published four times a year, the International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations is an essential source of information and analysis for labour lawyers, academics, judges, policymakers and others. The Journal publishes original articles in the domains of labour law (broadly understood) and industrial relations. Articles cover comparative and international (or regional) analysis of topical issues, major developments and innovative practices, as well as discussions of theoretical and methodological approaches. The Journal adopts a double-blind peer review process. A distinguished editorial team, with the support of an International Advisory Board of eminent scholars from around the world, ensures a continuing high standard of scientific research dealing with a range of important issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信