政策制定、政策实施和政策塑造:地方政府应对COVID - 19大流行

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Chris Stoney, Andy Asquith, Karyn Kipper, Jeff McNeill, John Martin, Alessandro Spano
{"title":"政策制定、政策实施和政策塑造:地方政府应对COVID - 19大流行","authors":"Chris Stoney,&nbsp;Andy Asquith,&nbsp;Karyn Kipper,&nbsp;Jeff McNeill,&nbsp;John Martin,&nbsp;Alessandro Spano","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.12585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged nations states across the world. They have implemented lockdown and social distancing and with the development of vaccines have gone to great lengths to build herd immunity for their populations. As place managers, local government has played a variety of roles supporting central government edicts related to social distancing and supporting local businesses impacted by lockdowns. The research reported here comparing the role local government has played in Australia, Canada, Italy, and New Zealand shows that they have at different times and for different issues been policy takers from central government, policy shapers, and policy makers adapting national strategies. Local government plays an important complementary role with central governments in both unitary and federal systems of government. The paper contributes to the literature on multi-level governance, place-based decision-making, and disaster and emergency management by offering a framework for analysing municipal roles in crises management both in their relationship with higher layers of government and in their acting as locally placed organisations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Cross-national study: Australia, Canada, Italy, and New Zealand.</li>\n \n <li>Examination of local government responses to COVID-19 pandemic as policy makers, takers, or shapers.</li>\n \n <li>Comparison of federal and unitary states.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47373,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8500.12585","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy-making, policy-taking, and policy-shaping: Local government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Chris Stoney,&nbsp;Andy Asquith,&nbsp;Karyn Kipper,&nbsp;Jeff McNeill,&nbsp;John Martin,&nbsp;Alessandro Spano\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8500.12585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged nations states across the world. They have implemented lockdown and social distancing and with the development of vaccines have gone to great lengths to build herd immunity for their populations. As place managers, local government has played a variety of roles supporting central government edicts related to social distancing and supporting local businesses impacted by lockdowns. The research reported here comparing the role local government has played in Australia, Canada, Italy, and New Zealand shows that they have at different times and for different issues been policy takers from central government, policy shapers, and policy makers adapting national strategies. Local government plays an important complementary role with central governments in both unitary and federal systems of government. The paper contributes to the literature on multi-level governance, place-based decision-making, and disaster and emergency management by offering a framework for analysing municipal roles in crises management both in their relationship with higher layers of government and in their acting as locally placed organisations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Cross-national study: Australia, Canada, Italy, and New Zealand.</li>\\n \\n <li>Examination of local government responses to COVID-19 pandemic as policy makers, takers, or shapers.</li>\\n \\n <li>Comparison of federal and unitary states.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Public Administration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8500.12585\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Public Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.12585\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.12585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新冠肺炎疫情给世界各国带来了挑战。他们实施了封锁和保持社交距离,随着疫苗的开发,他们竭尽全力为其人群建立群体免疫力。作为场所管理者,地方政府发挥了各种作用,支持与保持社交距离有关的中央政府法令,并支持受封锁影响的当地企业。本文报道的研究比较了澳大利亚、加拿大、意大利和新西兰的地方政府所扮演的角色,表明他们在不同的时间和不同的问题上都是中央政府的决策者、政策制定者和调整国家战略的政策制定者。地方政府在单一制和联邦制政府中都与中央政府发挥着重要的互补作用。该论文为多层次治理、基于地方的决策以及灾害和应急管理的文献做出了贡献,提供了一个框架来分析市政在危机管理中的作用,包括它们与更高层政府的关系以及它们作为地方组织的作用。从业者要点:跨国家研究:澳大利亚、加拿大、意大利和新西兰。作为政策制定者、决策者或塑造者审查地方政府对新冠肺炎大流行的应对措施。联邦制州和单一制州的比较。©2023作者。John Wiley&Sons Australia,Ltd代表澳大利亚公共行政研究所出版的《澳大利亚公共行政杂志》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Policy-making, policy-taking, and policy-shaping: Local government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged nations states across the world. They have implemented lockdown and social distancing and with the development of vaccines have gone to great lengths to build herd immunity for their populations. As place managers, local government has played a variety of roles supporting central government edicts related to social distancing and supporting local businesses impacted by lockdowns. The research reported here comparing the role local government has played in Australia, Canada, Italy, and New Zealand shows that they have at different times and for different issues been policy takers from central government, policy shapers, and policy makers adapting national strategies. Local government plays an important complementary role with central governments in both unitary and federal systems of government. The paper contributes to the literature on multi-level governance, place-based decision-making, and disaster and emergency management by offering a framework for analysing municipal roles in crises management both in their relationship with higher layers of government and in their acting as locally placed organisations.

Points for practitioners

  • Cross-national study: Australia, Canada, Italy, and New Zealand.
  • Examination of local government responses to COVID-19 pandemic as policy makers, takers, or shapers.
  • Comparison of federal and unitary states.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Aimed at a diverse readership, the Australian Journal of Public Administration is committed to the study and practice of public administration, public management and policy making. It encourages research, reflection and commentary amongst those interested in a range of public sector settings - federal, state, local and inter-governmental. The journal focuses on Australian concerns, but welcomes manuscripts relating to international developments of relevance to Australian experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信