{"title":"斯瓦尔巴群岛阿道夫布克塔Nordenskiöldbreen出口冰川前海洋和陆地被动地震联合测量的案例研究","authors":"H. M. Stemland, B. Ruud, T. Johansen","doi":"10.1002/nsg.12266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Glaciers generate seismic waves due to calving and fracturing, and recording and following event classification can be used to monitor glacier dynamics. Our aim with this study is to analyze seismic data acquired at the seabed and on land in front of Nordenskiöldbreen on Svalbard during 8 days in October 2020. The survey included 27 ocean bottom nodes, each equipped with three geophones and a hydrophone, and 101 land‐based geophones. The resulting data contain numerous seismic P‐, S‐, and Scholte wave events throughout the study period, as well as non‐seismic gravity waves. The recording quality strongly depends on receiver type and location, especially for the latter wave types. Our results demonstrate that hydrophones at the seabed are advantageous to record gravity waves, and that Scholte waves are only recorded close to the glacier. The Scholte waves are used to estimate the near‐surface S‐wave profile of the seabed sediments, and the gravity wave amplitudes are converted to wave height at the surface. We further discuss possible source mechanisms for the recorded events and present evidence that waves from earthquakes, calving, and brittle fracturing of the glacier and icebergs are all represented in the data. The interpretation is based on frequency content, duration, seismic velocities, and onset (emergent/impulsive), and supported by source localization which we show is challenging for this dataset. In conclusion, our study demonstrates the potential of using seismic for detecting glacier‐related events and provides valuable knowledge about the importance of survey geometry, particularly the advantages of including seabed receivers in the vicinity of the glacier.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved","PeriodicalId":49771,"journal":{"name":"Near Surface Geophysics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case study of combined marine and land‐based passive seismic surveying in front of Nordenskiöldbreen outlet glacier, Adolfbukta, Svalbard\",\"authors\":\"H. M. Stemland, B. Ruud, T. Johansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nsg.12266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Glaciers generate seismic waves due to calving and fracturing, and recording and following event classification can be used to monitor glacier dynamics. Our aim with this study is to analyze seismic data acquired at the seabed and on land in front of Nordenskiöldbreen on Svalbard during 8 days in October 2020. The survey included 27 ocean bottom nodes, each equipped with three geophones and a hydrophone, and 101 land‐based geophones. The resulting data contain numerous seismic P‐, S‐, and Scholte wave events throughout the study period, as well as non‐seismic gravity waves. The recording quality strongly depends on receiver type and location, especially for the latter wave types. Our results demonstrate that hydrophones at the seabed are advantageous to record gravity waves, and that Scholte waves are only recorded close to the glacier. The Scholte waves are used to estimate the near‐surface S‐wave profile of the seabed sediments, and the gravity wave amplitudes are converted to wave height at the surface. We further discuss possible source mechanisms for the recorded events and present evidence that waves from earthquakes, calving, and brittle fracturing of the glacier and icebergs are all represented in the data. The interpretation is based on frequency content, duration, seismic velocities, and onset (emergent/impulsive), and supported by source localization which we show is challenging for this dataset. In conclusion, our study demonstrates the potential of using seismic for detecting glacier‐related events and provides valuable knowledge about the importance of survey geometry, particularly the advantages of including seabed receivers in the vicinity of the glacier.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved\",\"PeriodicalId\":49771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Near Surface Geophysics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Near Surface Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12266\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Near Surface Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Case study of combined marine and land‐based passive seismic surveying in front of Nordenskiöldbreen outlet glacier, Adolfbukta, Svalbard
Glaciers generate seismic waves due to calving and fracturing, and recording and following event classification can be used to monitor glacier dynamics. Our aim with this study is to analyze seismic data acquired at the seabed and on land in front of Nordenskiöldbreen on Svalbard during 8 days in October 2020. The survey included 27 ocean bottom nodes, each equipped with three geophones and a hydrophone, and 101 land‐based geophones. The resulting data contain numerous seismic P‐, S‐, and Scholte wave events throughout the study period, as well as non‐seismic gravity waves. The recording quality strongly depends on receiver type and location, especially for the latter wave types. Our results demonstrate that hydrophones at the seabed are advantageous to record gravity waves, and that Scholte waves are only recorded close to the glacier. The Scholte waves are used to estimate the near‐surface S‐wave profile of the seabed sediments, and the gravity wave amplitudes are converted to wave height at the surface. We further discuss possible source mechanisms for the recorded events and present evidence that waves from earthquakes, calving, and brittle fracturing of the glacier and icebergs are all represented in the data. The interpretation is based on frequency content, duration, seismic velocities, and onset (emergent/impulsive), and supported by source localization which we show is challenging for this dataset. In conclusion, our study demonstrates the potential of using seismic for detecting glacier‐related events and provides valuable knowledge about the importance of survey geometry, particularly the advantages of including seabed receivers in the vicinity of the glacier.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
期刊介绍:
Near Surface Geophysics is an international journal for the publication of research and development in geophysics applied to near surface. It places emphasis on geological, hydrogeological, geotechnical, environmental, engineering, mining, archaeological, agricultural and other applications of geophysics as well as physical soil and rock properties. Geophysical and geoscientific case histories with innovative use of geophysical techniques are welcome, which may include improvements on instrumentation, measurements, data acquisition and processing, modelling, inversion, interpretation, project management and multidisciplinary use. The papers should also be understandable to those who use geophysical data but are not necessarily geophysicists.