与终止妊娠相关的立法放宽是否使印度的堕胎安全?印度15-49岁女性不安全堕胎患病率的荟萃分析

S. Kumari, Mita Singh, Shweta Goswami, E. Gupta, Priyanka Sharma, Vidushi Gupta, S. Chaudhuri, J. Kishore
{"title":"与终止妊娠相关的立法放宽是否使印度的堕胎安全?印度15-49岁女性不安全堕胎患病率的荟萃分析","authors":"S. Kumari, Mita Singh, Shweta Goswami, E. Gupta, Priyanka Sharma, Vidushi Gupta, S. Chaudhuri, J. Kishore","doi":"10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_110_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pregnancy which is not terminated within the boundaries of legal definition in India is called an unsafe abortion. Objective: To observe the proportion of unsafe abortions among total abortions in 15–49-year-old ever married women across India between 1990 and 2020. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in National Library of Medicine's PubMed database, IndMED, TRIP, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published between January 1, 1990, and February 29, 2020. A combination of medical subject headings and free text word like abortion, induced, unsafe, women 15–49 years, prevalence, and India were used. Each article was assessed for quality using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. The proportion of subjects classified as having unsafe abortion was the outcome of meta-analysis. Analysis was done using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 2.2. All pooled estimates were calculated using DerSimonian–Laird random-effects model and reported as a proportion with 95% confidence intervals. Results: The pooled estimate of the mean prevalence of unsafe abortion in India was 37.56% (confidence interval: 20.68–54.44). There was a significant heterogeneity between the studies (I2 = 99.98% and Cochran's Q = 113538.65, df = 18, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Even after several amendments in Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act 1971 till 2020, unsafe abortions are highly prevalent in entire India, irrespective of high-performance or low-performance states. In urban India, the prevalence of unsafe abortions is comparatively higher than rural areas.","PeriodicalId":10321,"journal":{"name":"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"164 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Have the relaxations in legislation related to termination of pregnancy made abortions safe in India? A meta-analysis on the prevalence of unsafe abortions among 15–49-year-old females in India\",\"authors\":\"S. Kumari, Mita Singh, Shweta Goswami, E. Gupta, Priyanka Sharma, Vidushi Gupta, S. Chaudhuri, J. Kishore\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_110_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Pregnancy which is not terminated within the boundaries of legal definition in India is called an unsafe abortion. Objective: To observe the proportion of unsafe abortions among total abortions in 15–49-year-old ever married women across India between 1990 and 2020. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in National Library of Medicine's PubMed database, IndMED, TRIP, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published between January 1, 1990, and February 29, 2020. A combination of medical subject headings and free text word like abortion, induced, unsafe, women 15–49 years, prevalence, and India were used. Each article was assessed for quality using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. The proportion of subjects classified as having unsafe abortion was the outcome of meta-analysis. Analysis was done using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 2.2. All pooled estimates were calculated using DerSimonian–Laird random-effects model and reported as a proportion with 95% confidence intervals. Results: The pooled estimate of the mean prevalence of unsafe abortion in India was 37.56% (confidence interval: 20.68–54.44). There was a significant heterogeneity between the studies (I2 = 99.98% and Cochran's Q = 113538.65, df = 18, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Even after several amendments in Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act 1971 till 2020, unsafe abortions are highly prevalent in entire India, irrespective of high-performance or low-performance states. In urban India, the prevalence of unsafe abortions is comparatively higher than rural areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"164 - 171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_110_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_110_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:在印度,没有在法律定义的范围内终止妊娠被称为不安全堕胎。目的:观察1990 - 2020年印度15 - 49岁已婚妇女不安全流产占总流产的比例。材料和方法:对1990年1月1日至2020年2月29日期间发表的文章在美国国家医学图书馆PubMed数据库、IndMED、TRIP、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar中进行了全面检索。使用了医学主题标题和自由文本词的组合,如堕胎,诱导,不安全,15-49岁妇女,患病率和印度。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估工具评估每篇文章的质量。分类为不安全流产的受试者比例是meta分析的结果。采用2.2版综合meta分析进行分析。所有汇总估计均使用dersimonan - laird随机效应模型计算,并以95%置信区间的比例报告。结果:汇总估计印度不安全堕胎的平均患病率为37.56%(置信区间:20.68-54.44)。研究间存在显著异质性(I2 = 99.98%, Cochran’s Q = 113538.65, df = 18, P < 0.001)。结论:即使经过1971年至2020年《医疗终止妊娠法》的几次修订,不安全堕胎在整个印度都非常普遍,无论表现良好还是表现不佳的州。在印度城市,不安全堕胎的流行率相对高于农村地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Have the relaxations in legislation related to termination of pregnancy made abortions safe in India? A meta-analysis on the prevalence of unsafe abortions among 15–49-year-old females in India
Background: Pregnancy which is not terminated within the boundaries of legal definition in India is called an unsafe abortion. Objective: To observe the proportion of unsafe abortions among total abortions in 15–49-year-old ever married women across India between 1990 and 2020. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in National Library of Medicine's PubMed database, IndMED, TRIP, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published between January 1, 1990, and February 29, 2020. A combination of medical subject headings and free text word like abortion, induced, unsafe, women 15–49 years, prevalence, and India were used. Each article was assessed for quality using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. The proportion of subjects classified as having unsafe abortion was the outcome of meta-analysis. Analysis was done using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 2.2. All pooled estimates were calculated using DerSimonian–Laird random-effects model and reported as a proportion with 95% confidence intervals. Results: The pooled estimate of the mean prevalence of unsafe abortion in India was 37.56% (confidence interval: 20.68–54.44). There was a significant heterogeneity between the studies (I2 = 99.98% and Cochran's Q = 113538.65, df = 18, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Even after several amendments in Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act 1971 till 2020, unsafe abortions are highly prevalent in entire India, irrespective of high-performance or low-performance states. In urban India, the prevalence of unsafe abortions is comparatively higher than rural areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信