稳态煤渗透率实验的数值模拟评价

Q3 Engineering
J. Zang, Kai Wang
{"title":"稳态煤渗透率实验的数值模拟评价","authors":"J. Zang, Kai Wang","doi":"10.1504/ijmme.2018.10013241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By using the numerical simulator developed in our previous work, this paper conducted four simulation cases on the steady-state coal permeability experiments. One case is not backpressure-regulated and the other three are backpressure-regulated with different constant differential pressures between the upstream and the downstream end. The simulation results indicate that the backpressure-regulated steady-state method is superior to the non-backpressure-regulated in terms of the measurement accuracy. The results also indicate that a small differential pressure may be preferable to a higher value for the backpressure-regulated method in order to obtain more accurate permeability measurements. These conclusions may be meaningful for future coal permeability measurements with the steady-state method.","PeriodicalId":38622,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering","volume":"9 1","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the steady-state coal permeability experiments: a numerical simulation study\",\"authors\":\"J. Zang, Kai Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ijmme.2018.10013241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By using the numerical simulator developed in our previous work, this paper conducted four simulation cases on the steady-state coal permeability experiments. One case is not backpressure-regulated and the other three are backpressure-regulated with different constant differential pressures between the upstream and the downstream end. The simulation results indicate that the backpressure-regulated steady-state method is superior to the non-backpressure-regulated in terms of the measurement accuracy. The results also indicate that a small differential pressure may be preferable to a higher value for the backpressure-regulated method in order to obtain more accurate permeability measurements. These conclusions may be meaningful for future coal permeability measurements with the steady-state method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmme.2018.10013241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmme.2018.10013241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文利用前人开发的数值模拟软件,对稳态煤渗透率实验进行了四个模拟实例。一种情况是不进行背压调节的,而其他三种情况是通过上游端和下游端之间不同的恒定压差进行背压调节。仿真结果表明,在测量精度方面,背压调节稳态法优于非背压调节稳态方法。结果还表明,对于背压调节方法,小的压差可能比更高的值更可取,以便获得更精确的渗透率测量。这些结论可能对未来用稳态方法测量煤的渗透率有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the steady-state coal permeability experiments: a numerical simulation study
By using the numerical simulator developed in our previous work, this paper conducted four simulation cases on the steady-state coal permeability experiments. One case is not backpressure-regulated and the other three are backpressure-regulated with different constant differential pressures between the upstream and the downstream end. The simulation results indicate that the backpressure-regulated steady-state method is superior to the non-backpressure-regulated in terms of the measurement accuracy. The results also indicate that a small differential pressure may be preferable to a higher value for the backpressure-regulated method in order to obtain more accurate permeability measurements. These conclusions may be meaningful for future coal permeability measurements with the steady-state method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering
International Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信