既是本地人，又是外国人

IF 0.9 Q2 LINGUISTICS

Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Pub Date : 2020-10-25 DOI:10.1075/aral.19059.min

Harumi Minagawa, Dallas Nesbitt

{"title":"既是本地人，又是外国人","authors":"Harumi Minagawa, Dallas Nesbitt","doi":"10.1075/aral.19059.min","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Pennington and Richards (2016) argue that if the medium of instruction (MOI) is\n not the native language of the instructor, lack of proficiency in the MOI could bring about a lack of confidence. This study inquired how\n native Japanese as a Foreign Language (JFL) teachers at tertiary institutions in New Zealand and Australia perceive their English\n proficiency, how it influences their linguistic identity, and how the fact that they are native speakers of the target language influences\n their linguistic identity. Based on responses from an online questionnaire with more than 50 respondents as well as 12 follow-up individual\n interviews, this study argues that their linguistic identity is not narrowly conceived around their non-nativeness in English and nativeness\n in Japanese, but constructed from more multi-faceted aspects of language teacher identity formation, especially by factors pertinent to the\n very nature of the tertiary teaching environment in these countries.","PeriodicalId":43911,"journal":{"name":"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Being native and being foreign\",\"authors\":\"Harumi Minagawa, Dallas Nesbitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/aral.19059.min\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Pennington and Richards (2016) argue that if the medium of instruction (MOI) is\\n not the native language of the instructor, lack of proficiency in the MOI could bring about a lack of confidence. This study inquired how\\n native Japanese as a Foreign Language (JFL) teachers at tertiary institutions in New Zealand and Australia perceive their English\\n proficiency, how it influences their linguistic identity, and how the fact that they are native speakers of the target language influences\\n their linguistic identity. Based on responses from an online questionnaire with more than 50 respondents as well as 12 follow-up individual\\n interviews, this study argues that their linguistic identity is not narrowly conceived around their non-nativeness in English and nativeness\\n in Japanese, but constructed from more multi-faceted aspects of language teacher identity formation, especially by factors pertinent to the\\n very nature of the tertiary teaching environment in these countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.19059.min\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.19059.min","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

Pennington和Richards(2016)认为，如果教学媒介(MOI)不是教师的母语，那么缺乏对MOI的熟练程度可能会导致缺乏信心。本研究调查了新西兰和澳大利亚高等教育机构的日语作为外语(JFL)教师如何看待他们的英语水平，这如何影响他们的语言认同，以及他们是目标语言的母语人士这一事实如何影响他们的语言认同。基于50多名受访者的在线问卷以及12次后续个人访谈，本研究认为，他们的语言认同不是狭隘地围绕他们的非母语英语和母语日语来构想的，而是从语言教师认同形成的更多方面构建的，特别是与这些国家高等教育环境的性质有关的因素。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Being native and being foreign

Pennington and Richards (2016) argue that if the medium of instruction (MOI) is not the native language of the instructor, lack of proficiency in the MOI could bring about a lack of confidence. This study inquired how native Japanese as a Foreign Language (JFL) teachers at tertiary institutions in New Zealand and Australia perceive their English proficiency, how it influences their linguistic identity, and how the fact that they are native speakers of the target language influences their linguistic identity. Based on responses from an online questionnaire with more than 50 respondents as well as 12 follow-up individual interviews, this study argues that their linguistic identity is not narrowly conceived around their non-nativeness in English and nativeness in Japanese, but constructed from more multi-faceted aspects of language teacher identity formation, especially by factors pertinent to the very nature of the tertiary teaching environment in these countries.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Australian Review of Applied Linguistics LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Australian Review of Applied Linguistics (ARAL) is the preeminent journal of the Applied Linguistics Association of Australia (ALAA). ARAL is a peer reviewed journal that promotes scholarly discussion and contemporary understandings of language-related matters with a view to impacting on real-world problems and debates. The journal publishes empirical and theoretical research on language/s in educational, professional, institutional and community settings. ARAL welcomes national and international submissions presenting research related to any of the major sub-disciplines of Applied Linguistics as well as transdisciplinary studies. Areas of particular interest include but are not limited to: · Analysis of discourse and interaction · Assessment and evaluation · Bi/multilingualism and bi/multilingual education · Corpus linguistics · Cognitive linguistics · Language, culture and identity · Language maintenance and revitalization · Language planning and policy · Language teaching and learning, including specific languages and TESOL · Pragmatics · Research design and methodology · Second language acquisition · Sociolinguistics · Language and technology · Translating and interpreting.