{"title":"应对危机:通过组织变革构建应对措施","authors":"J. Poulin","doi":"10.1080/10632913.2020.1844832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As the COVID-19 crisis exposed inequities in civic, funding, and programmatic policies – often grounded in systemic oppression and White Supremacy – community based, youth-focused organizations, such as Creative Youth Development (CYD) programs, were catapulted into unplanned changes in order to survive. In this tumultuous environment, organizations had to struggle, innovate, and revolutionize their practices, oftentimes without being able to properly reflect or predict consequences. This paper explores what the pandemic and its unspooling consequences are teaching us about what we need in a framework for thinking about organizational change and adaptation in times of crisis. Specifically, the author discusses how earlier frameworks need to expand to include: organizational development, distributed leadership, and growth mindset. The article concludes with a set of provocations derived from community-based conversations with organizational leaders as they innovated their practices in the difficult months of March and April 2020.","PeriodicalId":37632,"journal":{"name":"Arts Education Policy Review","volume":"123 1","pages":"6 - 13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10632913.2020.1844832","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responding to crises: constructing a response through organizational change\",\"authors\":\"J. Poulin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10632913.2020.1844832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract As the COVID-19 crisis exposed inequities in civic, funding, and programmatic policies – often grounded in systemic oppression and White Supremacy – community based, youth-focused organizations, such as Creative Youth Development (CYD) programs, were catapulted into unplanned changes in order to survive. In this tumultuous environment, organizations had to struggle, innovate, and revolutionize their practices, oftentimes without being able to properly reflect or predict consequences. This paper explores what the pandemic and its unspooling consequences are teaching us about what we need in a framework for thinking about organizational change and adaptation in times of crisis. Specifically, the author discusses how earlier frameworks need to expand to include: organizational development, distributed leadership, and growth mindset. The article concludes with a set of provocations derived from community-based conversations with organizational leaders as they innovated their practices in the difficult months of March and April 2020.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arts Education Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"123 1\",\"pages\":\"6 - 13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10632913.2020.1844832\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arts Education Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2020.1844832\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts Education Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2020.1844832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Responding to crises: constructing a response through organizational change
Abstract As the COVID-19 crisis exposed inequities in civic, funding, and programmatic policies – often grounded in systemic oppression and White Supremacy – community based, youth-focused organizations, such as Creative Youth Development (CYD) programs, were catapulted into unplanned changes in order to survive. In this tumultuous environment, organizations had to struggle, innovate, and revolutionize their practices, oftentimes without being able to properly reflect or predict consequences. This paper explores what the pandemic and its unspooling consequences are teaching us about what we need in a framework for thinking about organizational change and adaptation in times of crisis. Specifically, the author discusses how earlier frameworks need to expand to include: organizational development, distributed leadership, and growth mindset. The article concludes with a set of provocations derived from community-based conversations with organizational leaders as they innovated their practices in the difficult months of March and April 2020.
期刊介绍:
Arts Education Policy Review ( AEPR) presents discussion of major policy issues in arts education in the United States and throughout the world. Addressing education in music, visual arts, theatre, and dance, the journal presents a variety of views and emphasizes critical analysis. Its goal is to produce the most comprehensive and rigorous exchange of ideas available on arts education policy. Policy examinations from multiple viewpoints are a valuable resource not only for arts educators, but also for administrators, policy analysts, advocacy groups, parents, and audiences—all those involved in the arts and concerned about their role in education. AEPR focuses on analyses and recommendations focused on policy. The goal of any article should not be description or celebration (although reports of successful programs could be part of an article). Any article focused on a program (or programs) should address why something works or does not work, how it works, how it could work better, and most important, what various policy stakeholders (from teachers to legislators) can do about it. AEPR does not promote individuals, institutions, methods, or products. It does not aim to repeat commonplace ideas. Editors want articles that show originality, probe deeply, and take discussion beyond common wisdom and familiar rhetoric. Articles that merely restate the importance of arts education, call attention to the existence of issues long since addressed, or repeat standard solutions will not be accepted.