税收遵从与慈善捐赠的经济心理学:比较分析与研究议程

IF 0.1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY
C. Castiglioni, E. Lozza
{"title":"税收遵从与慈善捐赠的经济心理学:比较分析与研究议程","authors":"C. Castiglioni, E. Lozza","doi":"10.3280/rip2021oa12237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finding mechanisms to promote prosocial spending behavior is fundamental to the well-being of our societies and is more urgent than ever in a time of key global challenges, including social and economic inequalities. Tax payment and charitable giving can be seen as two complementary ways to financially provide for the common good and, like many other social dilemmas, they both involve a conflict between what is good for oneself and what is good for others. The aim of the present article is to perform a comparative analysis of the main determinants of tax behavior and charitable giving to identify some common antecedents to gain insight to promote pro-social financial decisions at large. Despite the intrinsic differences, several commonalities were found, thus suggesting a transcending common core. By identifying well-established literature and under-investigated areas, a new research agenda is formulated.","PeriodicalId":41732,"journal":{"name":"Ricerche di Psicologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Economic Psychology of Tax Compliance and Charitable Giving: A Comparative Analysis and Research Agenda\",\"authors\":\"C. Castiglioni, E. Lozza\",\"doi\":\"10.3280/rip2021oa12237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Finding mechanisms to promote prosocial spending behavior is fundamental to the well-being of our societies and is more urgent than ever in a time of key global challenges, including social and economic inequalities. Tax payment and charitable giving can be seen as two complementary ways to financially provide for the common good and, like many other social dilemmas, they both involve a conflict between what is good for oneself and what is good for others. The aim of the present article is to perform a comparative analysis of the main determinants of tax behavior and charitable giving to identify some common antecedents to gain insight to promote pro-social financial decisions at large. Despite the intrinsic differences, several commonalities were found, thus suggesting a transcending common core. By identifying well-established literature and under-investigated areas, a new research agenda is formulated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ricerche di Psicologia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ricerche di Psicologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3280/rip2021oa12237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ricerche di Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/rip2021oa12237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

寻找促进亲社会支出行为的机制对我们社会的福祉至关重要,在包括社会和经济不平等在内的关键全球挑战时期,这一点比以往任何时候都更加紧迫。纳税和慈善捐赠可以被视为在经济上为共同利益提供资金的两种互补方式,与许多其他社会困境一样,它们都涉及对自己有益和对他人有益之间的冲突。本文的目的是对税收行为和慈善捐赠的主要决定因素进行比较分析,以确定一些共同的前因,从而深入了解促进整个社会的财务决策。尽管存在内在差异,但还是发现了一些共性,从而表明了一个超越的共同核心。通过确定已有文献和调查不足的领域,制定了新的研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Economic Psychology of Tax Compliance and Charitable Giving: A Comparative Analysis and Research Agenda
Finding mechanisms to promote prosocial spending behavior is fundamental to the well-being of our societies and is more urgent than ever in a time of key global challenges, including social and economic inequalities. Tax payment and charitable giving can be seen as two complementary ways to financially provide for the common good and, like many other social dilemmas, they both involve a conflict between what is good for oneself and what is good for others. The aim of the present article is to perform a comparative analysis of the main determinants of tax behavior and charitable giving to identify some common antecedents to gain insight to promote pro-social financial decisions at large. Despite the intrinsic differences, several commonalities were found, thus suggesting a transcending common core. By identifying well-established literature and under-investigated areas, a new research agenda is formulated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Ricerche di psicologia(Psychology Research) is a scientific journal - addressed primarily to the community of Italian psychologists, both academic and professional - which tackles all psychological issues. Each issue contains a series of papers on the most salient and up-to-date themes of contemporary psychological research. Ricerche di psicologia focuses particular attention on: general, cognitive and experimental psychology; history of psychology; physiological psychology, neuropsychology and psychobiology; comparative and animal psychology; psychometrics and psychological research methodology, developmental and educational psychology; social psychology; work and organizational psychology; dynamic psychology; clinical psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信