K. Taemkaew, C. Churungsuk, K. Khanungwanitkul, W. Keeratichananont, P. Tanutit, T. Liabsuetrakul
{"title":"体成分作为非转移性非小细胞肺癌患者生存的预后指标","authors":"K. Taemkaew, C. Churungsuk, K. Khanungwanitkul, W. Keeratichananont, P. Tanutit, T. Liabsuetrakul","doi":"10.31584/jhsmr.2023980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Although, previous research have shown that patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with a higher body mass index (BMI), have a lower risk of death, only a few studies have examined the effects of body composition. Hence, this study examined the prognostic value of skeletal muscle mass and fat mass in patients with non-metastatic NSCLC. Material and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study; from 2008 to 2012. Eighty-eight of 130 non-metastatic NSCLC patients underwent computed tomography to assess paravertebral skeletal muscle, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and visceral adipose-tissue (VAT) at the 3rd lumbar vertebral level. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze body-composition correlations. Cox regression analysis was used to determine prognostic markers. Results: Higher SAT and VAT indices were associated with a higher-survival probability (HR, 0.79; p-value=0.001 and, HR 0.88; p-value=0.016, respectively). In contrast, higher SAT density and VAT/SAT ratio were associated with a lower survival probability (HR 1.16, p-value=0.012; HR 1.28, p-value=0.006, respectively). Lower performance status and TNM stage 3 were associated with lower-survival probability (HR 2.60; p-value=0.004, HR 1.92; p-value=0.035, respectively).Conclusion: The VAT index predicts a better prognosis for patients with non-metastatic lung cancer; however, visceral-fat distribution, as measured by a high VAT/SAT ratio, is associated with a worse prognosis.","PeriodicalId":36211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Body Composition as Prognostic Markers for Survival of Patients with Non-Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer\",\"authors\":\"K. Taemkaew, C. Churungsuk, K. Khanungwanitkul, W. Keeratichananont, P. Tanutit, T. Liabsuetrakul\",\"doi\":\"10.31584/jhsmr.2023980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Although, previous research have shown that patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with a higher body mass index (BMI), have a lower risk of death, only a few studies have examined the effects of body composition. Hence, this study examined the prognostic value of skeletal muscle mass and fat mass in patients with non-metastatic NSCLC. Material and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study; from 2008 to 2012. Eighty-eight of 130 non-metastatic NSCLC patients underwent computed tomography to assess paravertebral skeletal muscle, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and visceral adipose-tissue (VAT) at the 3rd lumbar vertebral level. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze body-composition correlations. Cox regression analysis was used to determine prognostic markers. Results: Higher SAT and VAT indices were associated with a higher-survival probability (HR, 0.79; p-value=0.001 and, HR 0.88; p-value=0.016, respectively). In contrast, higher SAT density and VAT/SAT ratio were associated with a lower survival probability (HR 1.16, p-value=0.012; HR 1.28, p-value=0.006, respectively). Lower performance status and TNM stage 3 were associated with lower-survival probability (HR 2.60; p-value=0.004, HR 1.92; p-value=0.035, respectively).Conclusion: The VAT index predicts a better prognosis for patients with non-metastatic lung cancer; however, visceral-fat distribution, as measured by a high VAT/SAT ratio, is associated with a worse prognosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.2023980\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.2023980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Body Composition as Prognostic Markers for Survival of Patients with Non-Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Objective: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Although, previous research have shown that patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with a higher body mass index (BMI), have a lower risk of death, only a few studies have examined the effects of body composition. Hence, this study examined the prognostic value of skeletal muscle mass and fat mass in patients with non-metastatic NSCLC. Material and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study; from 2008 to 2012. Eighty-eight of 130 non-metastatic NSCLC patients underwent computed tomography to assess paravertebral skeletal muscle, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and visceral adipose-tissue (VAT) at the 3rd lumbar vertebral level. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze body-composition correlations. Cox regression analysis was used to determine prognostic markers. Results: Higher SAT and VAT indices were associated with a higher-survival probability (HR, 0.79; p-value=0.001 and, HR 0.88; p-value=0.016, respectively). In contrast, higher SAT density and VAT/SAT ratio were associated with a lower survival probability (HR 1.16, p-value=0.012; HR 1.28, p-value=0.006, respectively). Lower performance status and TNM stage 3 were associated with lower-survival probability (HR 2.60; p-value=0.004, HR 1.92; p-value=0.035, respectively).Conclusion: The VAT index predicts a better prognosis for patients with non-metastatic lung cancer; however, visceral-fat distribution, as measured by a high VAT/SAT ratio, is associated with a worse prognosis.